{"title":"A systematic review of library services platforms research and research agenda","authors":"Ze Liu , Bo Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2024.101325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With changes in technology and user behavior, library services platforms (LSPs) have emerged and evolved rapidly, as has research on LSPs. The systematic review involved the analysis of 22 studies drawn from 4726 records, with the objective of providing empirical insights into the functions and roles of LSPs. System types, vendors, research methods, participants, roles, and challenges in LSPs research were identified. The results show that the existing studies mainly involve three system types: Alma, Sierra, and WMS, and their vendors are Ex Libris, OCLC, and Innovative. LSPs involve mainly two main types of roles: management-related roles and services-related roles. Meanwhile, libraries face several challenges in the implementation of the LSPs, caused by a huge amount of data, insufficient training, a lack of human resources, and a limited budget. The findings highlight opportunities for future research, including enriching research methodologies and expanding the types of users and systems investigated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"46 4","pages":"Article 101325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library & Information Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074081882400046X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With changes in technology and user behavior, library services platforms (LSPs) have emerged and evolved rapidly, as has research on LSPs. The systematic review involved the analysis of 22 studies drawn from 4726 records, with the objective of providing empirical insights into the functions and roles of LSPs. System types, vendors, research methods, participants, roles, and challenges in LSPs research were identified. The results show that the existing studies mainly involve three system types: Alma, Sierra, and WMS, and their vendors are Ex Libris, OCLC, and Innovative. LSPs involve mainly two main types of roles: management-related roles and services-related roles. Meanwhile, libraries face several challenges in the implementation of the LSPs, caused by a huge amount of data, insufficient training, a lack of human resources, and a limited budget. The findings highlight opportunities for future research, including enriching research methodologies and expanding the types of users and systems investigated.
期刊介绍:
Library & Information Science Research, a cross-disciplinary and refereed journal, focuses on the research process in library and information science as well as research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance. All papers are subject to a double-blind reviewing process.