Effectiveness of behavior change techniques in eHealth-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Emma R. Douma , Tom Roovers , Mirela Habibović , Gert-Jan de Bruijn , Jos A. Bosch , Boris Schmitz , Willem J. Kop , on behalf of the TIMELY consortium
{"title":"Effectiveness of behavior change techniques in eHealth-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review","authors":"Emma R. Douma ,&nbsp;Tom Roovers ,&nbsp;Mirela Habibović ,&nbsp;Gert-Jan de Bruijn ,&nbsp;Jos A. Bosch ,&nbsp;Boris Schmitz ,&nbsp;Willem J. Kop ,&nbsp;on behalf of the TIMELY consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces risk of cardiovascular mortality, improves functional capacity and enhances quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). eHealth-based CR can increase participation rates, but research into effective components is necessary. The objective of this systematic review was to identify effective behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in eHealth-based CR interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A search of four databases (CINAHL, PubMed, PsychINFO, and MEDLINE) was conducted until January 10, 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating eHealth-based interventions for patients with CAD were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Effective Public Healthcare Practice Project tool. BCTs were coded following the Behavior Change Taxonomy. A best-evidence synthesis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of BCTs, with ratings ranging from A (strong evidence indicating either a positive effect (+) or no effect (-)) to D (no data collected).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 88 studies (25,007 participants) met the eligibility criteria. The interventions in these studies used 31 different BCTs. The most common BCTs were <em>instructions on how to perform the behavior</em> (k = 86), <em>social support</em> (k = 69) and <em>information about health consequences</em> (k = 56). The evidence for <em>action planning</em> was rated as A+ for medication adherence and diet. Conversely, for systematically decreasing the number of prompts/cues sent during an intervention, the evidence was rated as A- for physical activity, medication adherence and smoking cessation. The evidence for <em>feedback on behavior</em> was rated as A+ for medication adherence and A- for smoking cessation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Action planning is effective as a BCT in eHealth-based CR, whereas reducing prompts/cues is not. <em>Feedback on behavior</em> may, depending on the behavior targeted, exert both positive and no effect, suggesting that BCT-behavior matching is important to optimize effectiveness of eHealth-based CR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100892"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724002605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces risk of cardiovascular mortality, improves functional capacity and enhances quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). eHealth-based CR can increase participation rates, but research into effective components is necessary. The objective of this systematic review was to identify effective behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in eHealth-based CR interventions.

Methods

A search of four databases (CINAHL, PubMed, PsychINFO, and MEDLINE) was conducted until January 10, 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating eHealth-based interventions for patients with CAD were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Effective Public Healthcare Practice Project tool. BCTs were coded following the Behavior Change Taxonomy. A best-evidence synthesis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of BCTs, with ratings ranging from A (strong evidence indicating either a positive effect (+) or no effect (-)) to D (no data collected).

Results

A total of 88 studies (25,007 participants) met the eligibility criteria. The interventions in these studies used 31 different BCTs. The most common BCTs were instructions on how to perform the behavior (k = 86), social support (k = 69) and information about health consequences (k = 56). The evidence for action planning was rated as A+ for medication adherence and diet. Conversely, for systematically decreasing the number of prompts/cues sent during an intervention, the evidence was rated as A- for physical activity, medication adherence and smoking cessation. The evidence for feedback on behavior was rated as A+ for medication adherence and A- for smoking cessation.

Conclusions

Action planning is effective as a BCT in eHealth-based CR, whereas reducing prompts/cues is not. Feedback on behavior may, depending on the behavior targeted, exert both positive and no effect, suggesting that BCT-behavior matching is important to optimize effectiveness of eHealth-based CR.
基于电子健康的冠心病患者心脏康复中行为改变技术的有效性:系统综述
背景参加心脏康复(CR)可以降低冠心病(CAD)患者的心血管死亡风险、改善功能能力并提高生活质量。本系统性综述的目的是确定在基于电子健康的 CR 干预中使用的有效行为改变技术 (BCT)。方法在 2023 年 1 月 10 日前对四个数据库(CINAHL、PubMed、PsychINFO 和 MEDLINE)进行了检索。纳入的随机对照试验研究了针对 CAD 患者的基于电子健康的干预措施。采用有效公共医疗实践项目工具评估偏倚风险。BCT按照行为改变分类标准进行编码。对 BCT 的有效性进行了最佳证据综述,评级范围从 A(有力证据表明有积极效果 (+) 或无效果 (-) )到 D(未收集数据)。这些研究中的干预措施使用了 31 种不同的 BCT。最常见的BCT是关于如何实施行为的指导(k = 86)、社会支持(k = 69)和关于健康后果的信息(k = 56)。在坚持用药和饮食方面,行动规划的证据被评为 A+。相反,对于在干预过程中系统地减少提示/线索的数量,体育锻炼、坚持服药和戒烟的证据被评为 A-。结论在基于电子健康的 CR 中,行动规划作为 BCT 是有效的,而减少提示/提示则无效。根据目标行为的不同,对行为的反馈可能会产生积极效果,也可能不会产生任何效果,这表明BCT与行为的匹配对于优化基于电子健康的CR的效果非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信