{"title":"Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout","authors":"Valerie Boksa , Priyadarshini Pennathur","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The prevalence of burnout among healthcare providers has been steadily increasing, with a call to action issued in 2019. Immediately following this call to action, the COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed demand. Use of telemedicine expanded in response to COVID-19 and changed the experience of care delivery for healthcare providers. The impact of telemedicine use during COVID-19 on provider well-being is less well known. This study aims to assess the prevalence of burnout in providers who used telemedicine and to better understand which aspects of telemedicine exacerbate or alleviate provider burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Providers in urgent care clinics were invited to participate in a burnout assessment survey using the Maslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire. The prevalence of burnout, burnout profiles, and correlations were analyzed in the resulting data. Follow-up interviews provided further insight on contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on provider burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Survey results showed that 25 % of the respondents reported one or more burnout manifestations. Contributing and mediating factors were categorized to provide a framework to understand the risk and benefits this technology can pose to workplace stress.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings from this study provide technology- and organizational-level recommendations to prevent increased risk of burnout among telemedicine providers. Future research recommendations to better quantify the relationship between burnout and telemedicine use and to effectively design intervention and implementation strategies are discussed.</div></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><div>Considering the high rates of burnout in the healthcare industry prior to the pandemic, the severe demands the COVID-19 pandemic had on healthcare workers, and the drastic workflow changes due to the widespread adoption of telemedicine, it is important to assess current provider burnout levels and collect frontline clinician insights on how telemedicine positively or negatively influences workplace stress. A survey was administered to assess burnout in healthcare workers who provided care via telemedicine. Interviews provided additional insight on how telemedicine affected workplace stress. Survey results showed that 25 % of the respondents reported one or more manifestations of burnout. A correlation was found between personal accomplishment scores and reported months of telemedicine use. Interview and literature findings identified telemedicine design and use characteristics that contributed to and/or alleviated burnout. Results address how organizations can best support their employees who administer care via telemedicine and recommend future studies for research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100942"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724001059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The prevalence of burnout among healthcare providers has been steadily increasing, with a call to action issued in 2019. Immediately following this call to action, the COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed demand. Use of telemedicine expanded in response to COVID-19 and changed the experience of care delivery for healthcare providers. The impact of telemedicine use during COVID-19 on provider well-being is less well known. This study aims to assess the prevalence of burnout in providers who used telemedicine and to better understand which aspects of telemedicine exacerbate or alleviate provider burnout.
Methods
Providers in urgent care clinics were invited to participate in a burnout assessment survey using the Maslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire. The prevalence of burnout, burnout profiles, and correlations were analyzed in the resulting data. Follow-up interviews provided further insight on contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on provider burnout.
Results
Survey results showed that 25 % of the respondents reported one or more burnout manifestations. Contributing and mediating factors were categorized to provide a framework to understand the risk and benefits this technology can pose to workplace stress.
Discussion
The findings from this study provide technology- and organizational-level recommendations to prevent increased risk of burnout among telemedicine providers. Future research recommendations to better quantify the relationship between burnout and telemedicine use and to effectively design intervention and implementation strategies are discussed.
Public interest summary
Considering the high rates of burnout in the healthcare industry prior to the pandemic, the severe demands the COVID-19 pandemic had on healthcare workers, and the drastic workflow changes due to the widespread adoption of telemedicine, it is important to assess current provider burnout levels and collect frontline clinician insights on how telemedicine positively or negatively influences workplace stress. A survey was administered to assess burnout in healthcare workers who provided care via telemedicine. Interviews provided additional insight on how telemedicine affected workplace stress. Survey results showed that 25 % of the respondents reported one or more manifestations of burnout. A correlation was found between personal accomplishment scores and reported months of telemedicine use. Interview and literature findings identified telemedicine design and use characteristics that contributed to and/or alleviated burnout. Results address how organizations can best support their employees who administer care via telemedicine and recommend future studies for research.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics