Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Valerie Boksa , Priyadarshini Pennathur
{"title":"Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout","authors":"Valerie Boksa ,&nbsp;Priyadarshini Pennathur","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The prevalence of burnout among healthcare providers has been steadily increasing, with a call to action issued in 2019. Immediately following this call to action, the COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed demand. Use of telemedicine expanded in response to COVID-19 and changed the experience of care delivery for healthcare providers. The impact of telemedicine use during COVID-19 on provider well-being is less well known. This study aims to assess the prevalence of burnout in providers who used telemedicine and to better understand which aspects of telemedicine exacerbate or alleviate provider burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Providers in urgent care clinics were invited to participate in a burnout assessment survey using the Maslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire. The prevalence of burnout, burnout profiles, and correlations were analyzed in the resulting data. Follow-up interviews provided further insight on contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on provider burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Survey results showed that 25 % of the respondents reported one or more burnout manifestations. Contributing and mediating factors were categorized to provide a framework to understand the risk and benefits this technology can pose to workplace stress.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings from this study provide technology- and organizational-level recommendations to prevent increased risk of burnout among telemedicine providers. Future research recommendations to better quantify the relationship between burnout and telemedicine use and to effectively design intervention and implementation strategies are discussed.</div></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><div>Considering the high rates of burnout in the healthcare industry prior to the pandemic, the severe demands the COVID-19 pandemic had on healthcare workers, and the drastic workflow changes due to the widespread adoption of telemedicine, it is important to assess current provider burnout levels and collect frontline clinician insights on how telemedicine positively or negatively influences workplace stress. A survey was administered to assess burnout in healthcare workers who provided care via telemedicine. Interviews provided additional insight on how telemedicine affected workplace stress. Survey results showed that 25 % of the respondents reported one or more manifestations of burnout. A correlation was found between personal accomplishment scores and reported months of telemedicine use. Interview and literature findings identified telemedicine design and use characteristics that contributed to and/or alleviated burnout. Results address how organizations can best support their employees who administer care via telemedicine and recommend future studies for research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100942"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724001059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The prevalence of burnout among healthcare providers has been steadily increasing, with a call to action issued in 2019. Immediately following this call to action, the COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed demand. Use of telemedicine expanded in response to COVID-19 and changed the experience of care delivery for healthcare providers. The impact of telemedicine use during COVID-19 on provider well-being is less well known. This study aims to assess the prevalence of burnout in providers who used telemedicine and to better understand which aspects of telemedicine exacerbate or alleviate provider burnout.

Methods

Providers in urgent care clinics were invited to participate in a burnout assessment survey using the Maslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire. The prevalence of burnout, burnout profiles, and correlations were analyzed in the resulting data. Follow-up interviews provided further insight on contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on provider burnout.

Results

Survey results showed that 25 % of the respondents reported one or more burnout manifestations. Contributing and mediating factors were categorized to provide a framework to understand the risk and benefits this technology can pose to workplace stress.

Discussion

The findings from this study provide technology- and organizational-level recommendations to prevent increased risk of burnout among telemedicine providers. Future research recommendations to better quantify the relationship between burnout and telemedicine use and to effectively design intervention and implementation strategies are discussed.

Public interest summary

Considering the high rates of burnout in the healthcare industry prior to the pandemic, the severe demands the COVID-19 pandemic had on healthcare workers, and the drastic workflow changes due to the widespread adoption of telemedicine, it is important to assess current provider burnout levels and collect frontline clinician insights on how telemedicine positively or negatively influences workplace stress. A survey was administered to assess burnout in healthcare workers who provided care via telemedicine. Interviews provided additional insight on how telemedicine affected workplace stress. Survey results showed that 25 % of the respondents reported one or more manifestations of burnout. A correlation was found between personal accomplishment scores and reported months of telemedicine use. Interview and literature findings identified telemedicine design and use characteristics that contributed to and/or alleviated burnout. Results address how organizations can best support their employees who administer care via telemedicine and recommend future studies for research.
评估远程医疗对医护人员职业倦怠的促成因素和中介因素
目标医疗服务提供者中的职业倦怠发生率一直在稳步上升,并于 2019 年发出了行动呼吁。紧随这一行动号召之后,COVID-19 大流行极大地改变了需求。为应对 COVID-19,远程医疗的使用范围不断扩大,并改变了医疗服务提供者的医疗服务体验。COVID-19 期间远程医疗的使用对医疗服务提供者福祉的影响却鲜为人知。本研究旨在评估使用远程医疗的医疗服务提供者的职业倦怠发生率,并更好地了解远程医疗的哪些方面会加重或减轻医疗服务提供者的职业倦怠。对所得数据中的倦怠发生率、倦怠特征和相关性进行了分析。后续访谈进一步揭示了远程医疗对医疗服务提供者倦怠的促成因素和中介因素。本研究的结果为预防远程医疗提供者倦怠风险的增加提供了技术和组织层面的建议。讨论了未来的研究建议,以更好地量化倦怠与远程医疗使用之间的关系,并有效地设计干预和实施策略。公益摘要考虑到大流行之前医疗行业的高倦怠率、COVID-19 大流行对医疗工作者的严重要求以及远程医疗的广泛采用所带来的工作流程的巨大变化,评估当前医疗工作者的倦怠水平并收集一线临床医生对远程医疗如何积极或消极影响工作场所压力的见解非常重要。我们进行了一项调查,以评估通过远程医疗提供医疗服务的医护人员的职业倦怠。访谈则提供了有关远程医疗如何影响工作压力的更多信息。调查结果显示,25% 的受访者报告了一种或多种职业倦怠表现。个人成就感得分与报告的远程医疗使用月数之间存在相关性。访谈和文献研究结果确定了导致和/或减轻职业倦怠的远程医疗设计和使用特点。研究结果探讨了企业如何为通过远程医疗提供护理服务的员工提供最佳支持,并对未来的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信