Integrated farming system-A means of improving farmers’ well-being in the wetland ecosystem of Bangladesh

Saifun Akter , Jasim Uddin Ahmed , Ismat Ara Begum , Md Abdur Rouf Sarkar , Kanij Fatema , Asif Mahmud , Shijun Ding , Mohammad Jahangir Alam
{"title":"Integrated farming system-A means of improving farmers’ well-being in the wetland ecosystem of Bangladesh","authors":"Saifun Akter ,&nbsp;Jasim Uddin Ahmed ,&nbsp;Ismat Ara Begum ,&nbsp;Md Abdur Rouf Sarkar ,&nbsp;Kanij Fatema ,&nbsp;Asif Mahmud ,&nbsp;Shijun Ding ,&nbsp;Mohammad Jahangir Alam","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2024.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The wetland ecosystem (<em>Haor</em>) experiences recurrent flooding, which disrupts agricultural activities and impacts farmers' livelihoods annually. Addressing these challenges through integrated farming systems (IFSs) such as Crop ​+ ​Livestock ​+ ​Homestead-Agroforestry, Crop ​+ ​Livestock ​+ ​Fish farming, and Livestock ​+ ​Agroforestry is crucial. However, empirical evidence supporting the economic viability of specific IFSs remains limited. This study aimed to fill this gap by assessing the impact of IFSs on farmers' income and livelihoods in Sunamganj district, Bangladesh. Data from 312 participants collected before (2016) and after (2019) the project's intervention were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. Farmers in this region readily adopted diverse IFSs, integrating crop cultivation, livestock rearing, vegetable production, agroforestry, fish farming, and open-water fish catching, ensuring efficient resource utilization across enterprises. Predominantly, farmers adopted the Crop ​+ ​Livestock ​+ ​Homestead–Agroforestry ​+ ​Open water fish catching system, which had a benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of 1.40, while the Livestock ​+ ​Homestead–Agroforestry ​+ ​Open water fish catching system demonstrated the highest BCR at 1.58, indicating economic viability. Moreover, the adoption of IFSs led to a statistically significant increase in farming income (p ​&lt; ​0.10), contributing to a notable rise in total income. This adoption also correlated with significant improvements in human and financial capital, indicating a positive transformation in livelihood patterns. Therefore, the findings highlight the potential benefits of IFSs in enhancing farmers' well-being, specifically income and livelihood, and provide valuable insights for policymakers to support the integration of sustainable farming practices in the wetland ecosystem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The wetland ecosystem (Haor) experiences recurrent flooding, which disrupts agricultural activities and impacts farmers' livelihoods annually. Addressing these challenges through integrated farming systems (IFSs) such as Crop ​+ ​Livestock ​+ ​Homestead-Agroforestry, Crop ​+ ​Livestock ​+ ​Fish farming, and Livestock ​+ ​Agroforestry is crucial. However, empirical evidence supporting the economic viability of specific IFSs remains limited. This study aimed to fill this gap by assessing the impact of IFSs on farmers' income and livelihoods in Sunamganj district, Bangladesh. Data from 312 participants collected before (2016) and after (2019) the project's intervention were analyzed using descriptive statistical methods. Farmers in this region readily adopted diverse IFSs, integrating crop cultivation, livestock rearing, vegetable production, agroforestry, fish farming, and open-water fish catching, ensuring efficient resource utilization across enterprises. Predominantly, farmers adopted the Crop ​+ ​Livestock ​+ ​Homestead–Agroforestry ​+ ​Open water fish catching system, which had a benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of 1.40, while the Livestock ​+ ​Homestead–Agroforestry ​+ ​Open water fish catching system demonstrated the highest BCR at 1.58, indicating economic viability. Moreover, the adoption of IFSs led to a statistically significant increase in farming income (p ​< ​0.10), contributing to a notable rise in total income. This adoption also correlated with significant improvements in human and financial capital, indicating a positive transformation in livelihood patterns. Therefore, the findings highlight the potential benefits of IFSs in enhancing farmers' well-being, specifically income and livelihood, and provide valuable insights for policymakers to support the integration of sustainable farming practices in the wetland ecosystem.

Abstract Image

综合耕作系统--改善孟加拉国湿地生态系统中农民福祉的手段
湿地生态系统(霍尔)经常遭受洪灾,每年都会扰乱农业活动,影响农民的生计。通过综合耕作制度(IFS),如作物+畜牧业+宅基地-农林业、作物+畜牧业+养鱼业和畜牧业+农林业来应对这些挑战至关重要。然而,支持特定综合农林业系统经济可行性的经验证据仍然有限。本研究旨在通过评估综合融资战略对孟加拉国苏南甘杰地区农民收入和生计的影响来填补这一空白。研究采用描述性统计方法,对项目干预前(2016 年)和干预后(2019 年)收集的 312 名参与者的数据进行了分析。该地区的农民乐于采用多样化的综合融资战略,将作物种植、牲畜饲养、蔬菜生产、农林业、养鱼业和露天捕鱼结合起来,确保了各企业之间资源的有效利用。农民主要采用 "农作物+畜牧业+宅基地-农林业+开放式水域捕鱼 "系统,该系统的效益成本比(BCR)为 1.40,而 "畜牧业+宅基地-农林业+开放式水域捕鱼 "系统的效益成本比最高,为 1.58,表明该系统具有经济可行性。此外,采用综合融资战略在统计意义上显著增加了农业收入(p < 0.10),使总收入显著增加。采用综合融资战略还与人力和金融资本的显著改善相关,表明生计模式发生了积极转变。因此,研究结果凸显了综合融资战略在提高农民福祉(尤其是收入和生计)方面的潜在益处,并为政策制定者提供了宝贵的见解,以支持在湿地生态系统中整合可持续耕作实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信