{"title":"Development and validation of the prosocial conformity tendency scale in adolescents","authors":"Yanfeng Xu , Xiyan Zhao , Delin Yu , Huting Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Prosocial conformity, the tendency to engage in prosocial behaviors due to social pressure or influence, plays a significant role in adolescent development. However, a comprehensive understanding of its underlying structure and a validated measurement for adolescents are lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Study 1 employed semi-structured interviews with 22 high school students. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify the core components of prosocial conformity. Study 2 involved three phases of data collection with a total of 783 high school students. Based on the qualitative findings, an 18-item self-report scale was developed and refined through a series of psychometric evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Qualitative analysis revealed four distinct dimensions of prosocial conformity: Social Morality Conformity, Altruistic and Helping Conformity, Group-Oriented and Rule-Following Conformity, and Social Relationship Conformity. EFA supported a four-factor, 18-item structure, which was confirmed by CFA. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency, good criterion-related validity, measurement invariance across genders, and satisfactory test-retest reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The four-factor structure offers a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted construct of prosocial conformity. And the developed Prosocial Conformity Tendency Scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 112932"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Prosocial conformity, the tendency to engage in prosocial behaviors due to social pressure or influence, plays a significant role in adolescent development. However, a comprehensive understanding of its underlying structure and a validated measurement for adolescents are lacking.
Method
Study 1 employed semi-structured interviews with 22 high school students. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify the core components of prosocial conformity. Study 2 involved three phases of data collection with a total of 783 high school students. Based on the qualitative findings, an 18-item self-report scale was developed and refined through a series of psychometric evaluation.
Results
Qualitative analysis revealed four distinct dimensions of prosocial conformity: Social Morality Conformity, Altruistic and Helping Conformity, Group-Oriented and Rule-Following Conformity, and Social Relationship Conformity. EFA supported a four-factor, 18-item structure, which was confirmed by CFA. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency, good criterion-related validity, measurement invariance across genders, and satisfactory test-retest reliability.
Conclusion
The four-factor structure offers a nuanced understanding of the multifaceted construct of prosocial conformity. And the developed Prosocial Conformity Tendency Scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing it.
期刊介绍:
Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.