In vitro assessment of the impact of passion fruit peel–extracted pectin added with probiotic strains on the human intestinal microbiota and metabolic activity

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Rattanaporn Pimisa , Sehanat Prasongsuk , Wichanee Bankeeree , Pongsanat Pongcharoen , Silvia Arboleya , Alicja M. Nogacka , Clara G.de los Reyes-Gavilán , Noraphat Hwanhlem , Miguel Gueimonde
{"title":"In vitro assessment of the impact of passion fruit peel–extracted pectin added with probiotic strains on the human intestinal microbiota and metabolic activity","authors":"Rattanaporn Pimisa ,&nbsp;Sehanat Prasongsuk ,&nbsp;Wichanee Bankeeree ,&nbsp;Pongsanat Pongcharoen ,&nbsp;Silvia Arboleya ,&nbsp;Alicja M. Nogacka ,&nbsp;Clara G.de los Reyes-Gavilán ,&nbsp;Noraphat Hwanhlem ,&nbsp;Miguel Gueimonde","doi":"10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the impact of a novel passion fruit peel–extracted pectin (PFPEP) with and without probiotics on the human intestinal microbiota composition and metabolic activity, compared to commercial pectin (CP). Independent batch fermentations were conducted using fecal samples from four healthy donors aged between 25 and 40 years to assess changes in pH, gas accumulation, microbiota composition, short–chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production, and metabolic activity. Our findings revealed distinct responses to pectin types and probiotic strains. The fecal culture supplemented with CP resulted in a rapid drop in pH and promoted higher butyrate levels, as well as exhibited greater glucose content than PFPEP before fermentation. Conversely, PFPEP with and without probiotics stimulated large levels of acetate production. Whereas, the fermentation of PFPEP, with and without probiotics added, or CP showed similar results, a higher level of cumulative gas, an increase in levels of <em>Erysipelotrichaceae, Coriobacteriaceae</em>, and Bifidobacteriaceae families, a reduced in <em>Bacteroidaceae</em> and <em>Prevotellaceae</em> families and <em>Bacteroides</em> spp., and significant changes in metabolic activity were found. These results underscore the potential of PFPEP for modulating gut microbiota, guiding avenues for further research of this ingredient in human intervention studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":382,"journal":{"name":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 117082"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643824013653","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of a novel passion fruit peel–extracted pectin (PFPEP) with and without probiotics on the human intestinal microbiota composition and metabolic activity, compared to commercial pectin (CP). Independent batch fermentations were conducted using fecal samples from four healthy donors aged between 25 and 40 years to assess changes in pH, gas accumulation, microbiota composition, short–chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production, and metabolic activity. Our findings revealed distinct responses to pectin types and probiotic strains. The fecal culture supplemented with CP resulted in a rapid drop in pH and promoted higher butyrate levels, as well as exhibited greater glucose content than PFPEP before fermentation. Conversely, PFPEP with and without probiotics stimulated large levels of acetate production. Whereas, the fermentation of PFPEP, with and without probiotics added, or CP showed similar results, a higher level of cumulative gas, an increase in levels of Erysipelotrichaceae, Coriobacteriaceae, and Bifidobacteriaceae families, a reduced in Bacteroidaceae and Prevotellaceae families and Bacteroides spp., and significant changes in metabolic activity were found. These results underscore the potential of PFPEP for modulating gut microbiota, guiding avenues for further research of this ingredient in human intervention studies.
体外评估添加益生菌株的百香果果皮提取果胶对人体肠道微生物群和代谢活动的影响
与商品果胶(CP)相比,本研究调查了添加或不添加益生菌的新型百香果果皮提取果胶(PFPEP)对人体肠道微生物群组成和代谢活性的影响。我们使用四名年龄在 25 至 40 岁之间的健康捐献者的粪便样本进行了独立批次发酵,以评估 pH 值、气体积累、微生物群组成、短链脂肪酸(SCFAs)产生和代谢活动的变化。我们的研究结果表明,果胶类型和益生菌株会产生不同的反应。与发酵前的 PFPEP 相比,添加了 CP 的粪便培养物会导致 pH 值迅速下降,促进丁酸盐含量的提高,并显示出更高的葡萄糖含量。相反,添加和不添加益生菌的 PFPEP 都能刺激产生大量醋酸盐。而添加和不添加益生菌或 CP 的 PFPEP 发酵结果相似,累积气体水平较高,Erysipelotrichaceae、Coriobacteriaceae 和 Bifidobacteriaceae 家族的含量增加,Bacteroidaceae 和 Prevotellaceae 家族以及 Bacteroides spp.的含量减少,代谢活性也发生了显著变化。这些结果凸显了全氟辛酸肽调节肠道微生物群的潜力,为在人体干预研究中进一步研究这种成分提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LWT - Food Science and Technology
LWT - Food Science and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1724
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: LWT - Food Science and Technology is an international journal that publishes innovative papers in the fields of food chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, technology and nutrition. The work described should be innovative either in the approach or in the methods used. The significance of the results either for the science community or for the food industry must also be specified. Contributions written in English are welcomed in the form of review articles, short reviews, research papers, and research notes. Papers featuring animal trials and cell cultures are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信