Neural bases of referential thinking in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and high-risk mental states: A systematic review

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Daniel Santos-Carrasco , Juan Francisco Rodríguez-Testal , Manuel Vázquez-Marrufo
{"title":"Neural bases of referential thinking in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and high-risk mental states: A systematic review","authors":"Daniel Santos-Carrasco ,&nbsp;Juan Francisco Rodríguez-Testal ,&nbsp;Manuel Vázquez-Marrufo","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2024.100280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><div>Nowadays, schizophrenia research is moving towards the search for early signs of illness. One of the psychosis progression markers highlighted in scientific literature is referential thinking. Thus, the main objective of this work is to analyze the main forms of assessment of referential thinking, as well as the neural bases underlying this process in people with high-risk mental states and psychotic spectrum disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was carried out in three electronic databases (Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PubMed). Experimental studies with case-control designs were searched, and then analyzed both bibliographically and based on their potential risk of bias through the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42021291691].</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 200 potentially relevant studies, 28 met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that the most common way of assessment was the experimental task of making self-reflection about personality phrases and traits. In the studies reviewed, there was a greater number of negative self-references and a greater response latency among the patients when compared to controls. Regarding neural bases, patients showed more neural activity associated with referential thinking in areas such as the dorsomedial and ventromedial prefrontal cortices, the anterior and posterior cingulate cortices, or the precuneus.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results confirm the hypothesis of referential thinking as an indicator of progression in the psychotic continuum, while highlighting a set of areas that could be hyperactivated in a network of postero-anterior functional connectivity. This antero-posterior hub could underlie the referential thinking deficit in neuropsychiatric disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"39 1","pages":"Article 100280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616324000302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Nowadays, schizophrenia research is moving towards the search for early signs of illness. One of the psychosis progression markers highlighted in scientific literature is referential thinking. Thus, the main objective of this work is to analyze the main forms of assessment of referential thinking, as well as the neural bases underlying this process in people with high-risk mental states and psychotic spectrum disorders.

Methods

A systematic search was carried out in three electronic databases (Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PubMed). Experimental studies with case-control designs were searched, and then analyzed both bibliographically and based on their potential risk of bias through the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42021291691].

Results

Of the 200 potentially relevant studies, 28 met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that the most common way of assessment was the experimental task of making self-reflection about personality phrases and traits. In the studies reviewed, there was a greater number of negative self-references and a greater response latency among the patients when compared to controls. Regarding neural bases, patients showed more neural activity associated with referential thinking in areas such as the dorsomedial and ventromedial prefrontal cortices, the anterior and posterior cingulate cortices, or the precuneus.

Conclusions

The results confirm the hypothesis of referential thinking as an indicator of progression in the psychotic continuum, while highlighting a set of areas that could be hyperactivated in a network of postero-anterior functional connectivity. This antero-posterior hub could underlie the referential thinking deficit in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Abstract Image

精神分裂症谱系障碍和高危精神状态中参照思维的神经基础:系统回顾
背景和目的如今,精神分裂症研究正朝着寻找疾病早期征兆的方向发展。科学文献中强调的精神病进展标志之一是参照思维。因此,这项工作的主要目的是分析评估参照思维的主要形式,以及高危精神状态和精神谱系障碍患者这一过程的神经基础。方法在三个电子数据库(Web of Science、PsycInfo 和 PubMed)中进行了系统检索。检索了采用病例对照设计的实验研究,然后通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对这些研究进行了文献分析和潜在的偏倚风险分析。结果 在 200 项可能相关的研究中,有 28 项符合纳入标准。结果显示,最常见的评估方式是对人格短语和特质进行自我反思的实验任务。在所审查的研究中,与对照组相比,患者的负面自我暗示更多,反应潜伏期更长。在神经基础方面,患者在背内侧和腹外侧前额叶皮质、前扣带回皮质和后扣带回皮质或楔前皮质等区域表现出更多与参照思维相关的神经活动。这种前-后枢纽可能是神经精神疾病中参照思维缺陷的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信