Analyzing solar location for green hydrogen using multi-criteria decision analysis

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Jettarat Janmontree , Hartmut Zadek , Kasin Ransikarbum
{"title":"Analyzing solar location for green hydrogen using multi-criteria decision analysis","authors":"Jettarat Janmontree ,&nbsp;Hartmut Zadek ,&nbsp;Kasin Ransikarbum","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydrogen energy demand has grown remarkably to support applications around the globe. This study evaluates the green hydrogen supply chain's upstream process, specifically using electricity from solar energy in electrolysis. The focus is on identifying potential locations for solar photovoltaics based on geographic, climate, and solar criteria. The study uses Saxony-Anhalt in Germany as a case study, evaluating eleven districts and three independent cities as decision-making units to determine their efficiency in hydrogen production. The methodology employed is an integrated multi-criteria decision analysis framework to evaluate these alternatives under competing criteria. Initially, the data envelopment analysis method assesses each alternative's efficiency. Following this, the super-efficiency data envelopment analysis technique is applied to rank the efficient decision-making units. To validate the results, they are compared using the entropy weight method and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution. A techno-economic analysis is then conducted to simulate hydrogen production volume and cost, considering the efficiency of the installed solar photovoltaic plant and electrolyzer. The analysis shows that 57 % of all the evaluated alternatives are relatively efficient. Moreover, the Halle (Saale) district is identified as the most suitable location for hydrogen production based on efficiency and cost criteria. The findings provide a strategic policy model for further hydrogen supply chain development across upstream, midstream, and downstream operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 115102"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124008281","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrogen energy demand has grown remarkably to support applications around the globe. This study evaluates the green hydrogen supply chain's upstream process, specifically using electricity from solar energy in electrolysis. The focus is on identifying potential locations for solar photovoltaics based on geographic, climate, and solar criteria. The study uses Saxony-Anhalt in Germany as a case study, evaluating eleven districts and three independent cities as decision-making units to determine their efficiency in hydrogen production. The methodology employed is an integrated multi-criteria decision analysis framework to evaluate these alternatives under competing criteria. Initially, the data envelopment analysis method assesses each alternative's efficiency. Following this, the super-efficiency data envelopment analysis technique is applied to rank the efficient decision-making units. To validate the results, they are compared using the entropy weight method and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution. A techno-economic analysis is then conducted to simulate hydrogen production volume and cost, considering the efficiency of the installed solar photovoltaic plant and electrolyzer. The analysis shows that 57 % of all the evaluated alternatives are relatively efficient. Moreover, the Halle (Saale) district is identified as the most suitable location for hydrogen production based on efficiency and cost criteria. The findings provide a strategic policy model for further hydrogen supply chain development across upstream, midstream, and downstream operations.
利用多标准决策分析分析绿色氢气的太阳能选址
为支持全球各地的应用,氢能源需求显著增长。本研究评估了绿色氢气供应链的上游流程,特别是在电解过程中使用太阳能发电。重点是根据地理、气候和太阳能标准确定太阳能光伏发电的潜在地点。该研究以德国萨克森-安哈尔特州为案例,以 11 个区和 3 个独立城市为决策单元进行评估,以确定其制氢效率。所采用的方法是一个综合的多标准决策分析框架,根据竞争标准对这些替代方案进行评估。首先,数据包络分析法评估每个替代方案的效率。随后,采用超效率数据包络分析技术对高效决策单元进行排序。为了验证结果,使用熵权法和与理想解决方案相似度排序技术对结果进行比较。然后,考虑到已安装的太阳能光伏发电站和电解槽的效率,进行了技术经济分析,模拟氢气产量和成本。分析结果表明,在所有经过评估的替代方案中,57% 的方案相对高效。此外,根据效率和成本标准,哈勒(萨勒)地区被确定为最适合制氢的地点。研究结果为进一步发展氢气供应链的上游、中游和下游业务提供了战略政策模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信