Is the Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test a viable alternative to the Trier Social Stress Test?

IF 2.1 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Daniel S. Kashi, Marianne Hunter, Jason P. Edwards, Harry Bell, Megan Robinson, Neil P. Walsh
{"title":"Is the Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test a viable alternative to the Trier Social Stress Test?","authors":"Daniel S. Kashi,&nbsp;Marianne Hunter,&nbsp;Jason P. Edwards,&nbsp;Harry Bell,&nbsp;Megan Robinson,&nbsp;Neil P. Walsh","doi":"10.1016/j.cpnec.2024.100275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) is a widely used laboratory protocol to study acute stress reactivity, a hallmark of which is a meaningful increase in saliva cortisol (&gt;2.5 nmol/L) in most individuals, reflecting hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation. The Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test (MMST) has potential as a low staff burden alternative to the TSST, with one study showing statistically significant increases in subjective stress, heart rate and saliva cortisol; however, uncertainty remains about the meaningfulness of these psychobiological responses.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess whether the MMST is a viable alternative to the TSST.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a between subjects design, 31 healthy adults were randomised to the standard TSST or the MMST using stratified block randomisation accounting for sex and trait anxiety. The standard TSST consisted of an anticipation phase, followed by a free speech and mental arithmetic task performed in front of a panel of trained actors. The MMST consisted of a computer based Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (cognitive stressor) with additional motivational, emotional and acoustic stressors in the presence of one unresponsive observer.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Group × time interactions showed that the MMST induced smaller psychobiological responses compared with the TSST (mixed model ANCOVA, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Post-hoc analyses revealed that the MMST induced a significant yet smaller state anxiety response (score range 20–80, MMST: 47 ± 12 <em>vs.</em> TSST: 57 ± 9; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01, Cohens <em>d</em> = 0.9) and peak heart rate response (MMST: 98 ± 17 <em>vs.</em> TSST: 110 ± 21 bpm; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05, Cohens <em>d</em> = 0.6) compared with the TSST. Despite observing stereotypical neuroendocrine responses to the TSST, the MMST did not increase saliva α-amylase or cortisol (Δ saliva cortisol, 0.1 ± 1.1 <em>vs.</em> TSST: 10.3 ± 12.8 nmol/L; between group difference <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01, Cohens <em>d</em> = 1.1). Moreover, meaningful increases in saliva cortisol (&gt;2.5 nmol/L) were observed in 80% of participants after the TSST but in no participant after the MMST.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test increased state anxiety and heart rate but not saliva cortisol. As such, the present results do not support the utility of the Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test as a viable alternative to The Trier Social Stress Test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72656,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666497624000511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) is a widely used laboratory protocol to study acute stress reactivity, a hallmark of which is a meaningful increase in saliva cortisol (>2.5 nmol/L) in most individuals, reflecting hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation. The Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test (MMST) has potential as a low staff burden alternative to the TSST, with one study showing statistically significant increases in subjective stress, heart rate and saliva cortisol; however, uncertainty remains about the meaningfulness of these psychobiological responses.

Objective

To assess whether the MMST is a viable alternative to the TSST.

Methods

Using a between subjects design, 31 healthy adults were randomised to the standard TSST or the MMST using stratified block randomisation accounting for sex and trait anxiety. The standard TSST consisted of an anticipation phase, followed by a free speech and mental arithmetic task performed in front of a panel of trained actors. The MMST consisted of a computer based Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (cognitive stressor) with additional motivational, emotional and acoustic stressors in the presence of one unresponsive observer.

Results

Group × time interactions showed that the MMST induced smaller psychobiological responses compared with the TSST (mixed model ANCOVA, P < 0.05). Post-hoc analyses revealed that the MMST induced a significant yet smaller state anxiety response (score range 20–80, MMST: 47 ± 12 vs. TSST: 57 ± 9; P < 0.01, Cohens d = 0.9) and peak heart rate response (MMST: 98 ± 17 vs. TSST: 110 ± 21 bpm; P < 0.05, Cohens d = 0.6) compared with the TSST. Despite observing stereotypical neuroendocrine responses to the TSST, the MMST did not increase saliva α-amylase or cortisol (Δ saliva cortisol, 0.1 ± 1.1 vs. TSST: 10.3 ± 12.8 nmol/L; between group difference P < 0.01, Cohens d = 1.1). Moreover, meaningful increases in saliva cortisol (>2.5 nmol/L) were observed in 80% of participants after the TSST but in no participant after the MMST.

Conclusion

The Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test increased state anxiety and heart rate but not saliva cortisol. As such, the present results do not support the utility of the Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test as a viable alternative to The Trier Social Stress Test.
曼海姆多成分压力测试是特里尔社会压力测试的可行替代方案吗?
背景特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)是一种广泛使用的实验室方案,用于研究急性压力反应性,其特点是大多数人的唾液皮质醇(2.5 nmol/L)会显著增加,反映出下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴的激活。曼海姆多组分压力测试(MMST)具有替代TSST的低人员负担潜力,一项研究显示,主观压力、心率和唾液皮质醇的增加具有统计学意义;但是,这些心理生物学反应的意义仍不确定。方法采用受试者间设计,使用分层区组随机法(考虑性别和特质焦虑)将31名健康成年人随机分配到标准TSST或MMST。标准 TSST 包括一个预期阶段,然后在一组训练有素的演员面前完成自由言论和心算任务。MMST包括一项基于计算机的步调听觉连续加法任务(认知压力源)以及额外的动机、情绪和声音压力源,并有一名无反应的观察者在场。结果组×时间的交互作用表明,与TSST相比,MMST引起的心理生物反应较小(混合模型方差分析,P < 0.05)。事后分析表明,与 TSST 相比,MMST 诱导的状态焦虑反应(得分范围为 20-80,MMST:47 ± 12 vs. TSST:57 ± 9;P <;0.01,Cohens d = 0.9)和心率峰值反应(MMST:98 ± 17 vs. TSST:110 ± 21 bpm;P <;0.05,Cohens d = 0.6)显著但较小。尽管观察到了 TSST 的刻板神经内分泌反应,但 MMST 并未增加唾液中的α-淀粉酶或皮质醇(Δ唾液皮质醇:0.1 ± 1.1 vs. TSST:10.3 ± 12.8 nmol/L;组间差异 P < 0.01,Cohens d = 1.1)。结论曼海姆多组分压力测试增加了状态焦虑和心率,但没有增加唾液皮质醇。因此,目前的结果并不支持将曼海姆多成分压力测试作为特里尔社会压力测试的可行替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology
Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信