Limin Zhang, Jin Su, Xiaozheng Wu, Wen Li, Yunzhi Chen
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of Qianjinweijing decoction in the treatment of bronchiectasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Limin Zhang, Jin Su, Xiaozheng Wu, Wen Li, Yunzhi Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory airway disease marked by permanent dilation of the bronchi, recurrent infections, and associated complications. The traditional Chinese medicine Qianjinweijing Decoction (QJWJ) has shown promising results in bronchiectasis treatment with few side effects. However, there is a lack of recent comprehensive research evaluating its effectiveness. This review aims to examine the effectiveness and safety of QJWJ in treating bronchiectasis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched 7 databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Chinese Science Database, China Biology Medicine Disc (Sinomed), PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until May 2023, in both Chinese and English. Two researchers conducted a comprehensive review of literature, extracting data based on predefined criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 and RStudio software. Quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADEpro (V3.6.) software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This review analysed 35 studies with 2609 patients. The QJWJ group consisted of 1318 patients, while the routine pharmacotherapy (RP) group had 1291 patients. Combining QJWJ and RP in bronchiectasis treatment showed better with clinical effectiveness [risk ratio (RR)=1.17, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (1.13, 1.21), <em>P</em> < 0.00001], the percentage of forced expiratory volume in the first second to the predicted value (FEV<sub>1</sub> %) [mean difference (MD)=3.52, 95 % CI (1.48, 5.55), <em>P</em> = 0.0007], the ratio of forced expiratory volume to forced vital capacity in the first second (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) [MD=6.62, 95 % CI (1.52, 11.72), <em>P</em> = 0.01], peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) [MD=7.14, 95 % CI (5.15, 9.12), <em>P</em> < 0.00001], white blood cell count (WBC) [MD=-1.42, 95 % CI (-2.53, -0.31), <em>P</em> = 0.01], c-reactive protein (CRP) [MD=-7.2, 95 % CI (-9.3, -5.1), <em>P</em> < 0.00001], and the procalcitonin (PCT) [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-1.39, 95 % CI (-2.02, -0.76), <em>P</em> < 0.0001], without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions [RR=0.79, 95 % CI (0.44, 1.42), <em>P</em> = 0.43]. QJWJ alone also significantly improved bronchiectasis treatment, enhanced clinical effectiveness [RR=1.19, 95 % CI (1.04, 1.36), <em>P</em> = 0.010], FEV<sub>1</sub> % [MD=7.09, 95 % CI (4.5, 9.68), <em>P</em> < 0.00001], and reduced WBC [MD=-2.7, 95 % CI (-3.7, -1.7), <em>P</em> < 0.00001], CRP [MD=-4.22, 95 % CI (-55.32, -3.12), <em>P</em> < 0.00001], without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions [RR=0.20, 95 % CI (0.01, 4.06), <em>P</em> = 0.29].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Evidence suggested that QJWJ, used alone or with RP, notably improved bronchiectasis treatment outcomes, enhanced lung function and reduced inflammation without raising adverse reaction risks. Yet, further support from high-quality, large-sample RCTs is needed to strengthen this conclusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 102418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory airway disease marked by permanent dilation of the bronchi, recurrent infections, and associated complications. The traditional Chinese medicine Qianjinweijing Decoction (QJWJ) has shown promising results in bronchiectasis treatment with few side effects. However, there is a lack of recent comprehensive research evaluating its effectiveness. This review aims to examine the effectiveness and safety of QJWJ in treating bronchiectasis.
Methods
We searched 7 databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Chinese Science Database, China Biology Medicine Disc (Sinomed), PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until May 2023, in both Chinese and English. Two researchers conducted a comprehensive review of literature, extracting data based on predefined criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 and RStudio software. Quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADEpro (V3.6.) software.
Results
This review analysed 35 studies with 2609 patients. The QJWJ group consisted of 1318 patients, while the routine pharmacotherapy (RP) group had 1291 patients. Combining QJWJ and RP in bronchiectasis treatment showed better with clinical effectiveness [risk ratio (RR)=1.17, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (1.13, 1.21), P < 0.00001], the percentage of forced expiratory volume in the first second to the predicted value (FEV1 %) [mean difference (MD)=3.52, 95 % CI (1.48, 5.55), P = 0.0007], the ratio of forced expiratory volume to forced vital capacity in the first second (FEV1/FVC) [MD=6.62, 95 % CI (1.52, 11.72), P = 0.01], peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) [MD=7.14, 95 % CI (5.15, 9.12), P < 0.00001], white blood cell count (WBC) [MD=-1.42, 95 % CI (-2.53, -0.31), P = 0.01], c-reactive protein (CRP) [MD=-7.2, 95 % CI (-9.3, -5.1), P < 0.00001], and the procalcitonin (PCT) [standardized mean difference (SMD)=-1.39, 95 % CI (-2.02, -0.76), P < 0.0001], without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions [RR=0.79, 95 % CI (0.44, 1.42), P = 0.43]. QJWJ alone also significantly improved bronchiectasis treatment, enhanced clinical effectiveness [RR=1.19, 95 % CI (1.04, 1.36), P = 0.010], FEV1 % [MD=7.09, 95 % CI (4.5, 9.68), P < 0.00001], and reduced WBC [MD=-2.7, 95 % CI (-3.7, -1.7), P < 0.00001], CRP [MD=-4.22, 95 % CI (-55.32, -3.12), P < 0.00001], without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions [RR=0.20, 95 % CI (0.01, 4.06), P = 0.29].
Conclusion
Evidence suggested that QJWJ, used alone or with RP, notably improved bronchiectasis treatment outcomes, enhanced lung function and reduced inflammation without raising adverse reaction risks. Yet, further support from high-quality, large-sample RCTs is needed to strengthen this conclusion.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education.
EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians.
The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.