Exploring the emission spillover effects in production networks under carbon trading market: Insights into complementary and competitive industries

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Mingdong Jiang , Xinxin Yu , Jingru Xu , Zepeng Wu , Xiaomei Shen , Guanyu Zhong
{"title":"Exploring the emission spillover effects in production networks under carbon trading market: Insights into complementary and competitive industries","authors":"Mingdong Jiang ,&nbsp;Xinxin Yu ,&nbsp;Jingru Xu ,&nbsp;Zepeng Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaomei Shen ,&nbsp;Guanyu Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the division of labor deepens, carbon emissions may easily escape through the intertwined production network and well-connected market. As a result, the effectiveness of carbon trading market can no longer be evaluated solely for the regulated regions or industries. Their spillover effects along production networks are necessary for determining whether the policy simply cuts carbon emissions radically or just drives their transmission. To this end, we regarded the pilot carbon emission trading market (PET) in China, as a quasi-natural experiment and employed the multi-regional input-output model to depict the inter-industry linkages. Its spillover impacts on their complementary (including upstream and downstream) and competitive industries have been examined separately, along with the deep mechanism and its heterogeneous feature. Results show that the PET significantly suppresses carbon emissions in upstream industries, while promoting carbon emissions in competitive ones. Furthermore, the PET reduces emissions in upstream industries mainly by decreasing production scale and improving technological innovation. In contrast, the production scale of the downstream industry is not significantly affected, though its energy structure and carbon emission intensity have been improved to a certain extent. Worse still, competitive industries seize the market share of regulated industries and expand production, leading to an increase in carbon emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107720"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019592552400307X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the division of labor deepens, carbon emissions may easily escape through the intertwined production network and well-connected market. As a result, the effectiveness of carbon trading market can no longer be evaluated solely for the regulated regions or industries. Their spillover effects along production networks are necessary for determining whether the policy simply cuts carbon emissions radically or just drives their transmission. To this end, we regarded the pilot carbon emission trading market (PET) in China, as a quasi-natural experiment and employed the multi-regional input-output model to depict the inter-industry linkages. Its spillover impacts on their complementary (including upstream and downstream) and competitive industries have been examined separately, along with the deep mechanism and its heterogeneous feature. Results show that the PET significantly suppresses carbon emissions in upstream industries, while promoting carbon emissions in competitive ones. Furthermore, the PET reduces emissions in upstream industries mainly by decreasing production scale and improving technological innovation. In contrast, the production scale of the downstream industry is not significantly affected, though its energy structure and carbon emission intensity have been improved to a certain extent. Worse still, competitive industries seize the market share of regulated industries and expand production, leading to an increase in carbon emissions.

Abstract Image

探索碳交易市场下生产网络的排放溢出效应:对互补产业和竞争产业的启示
随着分工的深化,碳排放很容易通过盘根错节的生产网络和四通八达的市场逃逸。因此,碳交易市场的有效性已不能只针对被监管的地区或行业进行评估。要确定该政策是否只是从根本上减少了碳排放,还是只是推动了碳排放的传播,就必须考虑其在生产网络中的溢出效应。为此,我们将中国碳排放权交易市场(PET)试点视为一个准自然实验,并采用多区域投入产出模型来描述产业间的联系。分别考察了其对互补产业(包括上下游)和竞争产业的溢出影响,以及深层机制和异质性特征。结果表明,PET 显著抑制了上游产业的碳排放,同时促进了竞争性产业的碳排放。此外,PET 主要通过降低生产规模和提高技术创新来减少上游产业的碳排放。相比之下,下游产业的生产规模虽然在一定程度上改善了能源结构和碳排放强度,但并未受到明显影响。更有甚者,竞争性行业抢占受管制行业的市场份额,扩大生产规模,导致碳排放量增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信