{"title":"Exploring the emission spillover effects in production networks under carbon trading market: Insights into complementary and competitive industries","authors":"Mingdong Jiang , Xinxin Yu , Jingru Xu , Zepeng Wu , Xiaomei Shen , Guanyu Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the division of labor deepens, carbon emissions may easily escape through the intertwined production network and well-connected market. As a result, the effectiveness of carbon trading market can no longer be evaluated solely for the regulated regions or industries. Their spillover effects along production networks are necessary for determining whether the policy simply cuts carbon emissions radically or just drives their transmission. To this end, we regarded the pilot carbon emission trading market (PET) in China, as a quasi-natural experiment and employed the multi-regional input-output model to depict the inter-industry linkages. Its spillover impacts on their complementary (including upstream and downstream) and competitive industries have been examined separately, along with the deep mechanism and its heterogeneous feature. Results show that the PET significantly suppresses carbon emissions in upstream industries, while promoting carbon emissions in competitive ones. Furthermore, the PET reduces emissions in upstream industries mainly by decreasing production scale and improving technological innovation. In contrast, the production scale of the downstream industry is not significantly affected, though its energy structure and carbon emission intensity have been improved to a certain extent. Worse still, competitive industries seize the market share of regulated industries and expand production, leading to an increase in carbon emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107720"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019592552400307X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As the division of labor deepens, carbon emissions may easily escape through the intertwined production network and well-connected market. As a result, the effectiveness of carbon trading market can no longer be evaluated solely for the regulated regions or industries. Their spillover effects along production networks are necessary for determining whether the policy simply cuts carbon emissions radically or just drives their transmission. To this end, we regarded the pilot carbon emission trading market (PET) in China, as a quasi-natural experiment and employed the multi-regional input-output model to depict the inter-industry linkages. Its spillover impacts on their complementary (including upstream and downstream) and competitive industries have been examined separately, along with the deep mechanism and its heterogeneous feature. Results show that the PET significantly suppresses carbon emissions in upstream industries, while promoting carbon emissions in competitive ones. Furthermore, the PET reduces emissions in upstream industries mainly by decreasing production scale and improving technological innovation. In contrast, the production scale of the downstream industry is not significantly affected, though its energy structure and carbon emission intensity have been improved to a certain extent. Worse still, competitive industries seize the market share of regulated industries and expand production, leading to an increase in carbon emissions.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.