How to stop groundwater drawdown in North China Plain? Combining agricultural management strategies and climate change

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Junji Ou , Beibei Ding , Puyu Feng , Yong Chen , Lili Yu , De Li Liu , Raghavan Srinivasan , Xueliang Zhang
{"title":"How to stop groundwater drawdown in North China Plain? Combining agricultural management strategies and climate change","authors":"Junji Ou ,&nbsp;Beibei Ding ,&nbsp;Puyu Feng ,&nbsp;Yong Chen ,&nbsp;Lili Yu ,&nbsp;De Li Liu ,&nbsp;Raghavan Srinivasan ,&nbsp;Xueliang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global crisis of groundwater depletion is becoming a challenge in irrigation agriculture. How to optimize the agricultural system amidst climate change is crucial for groundwater and food security around the world. In this study, the multiple cropping index (MCI) reducing strategy and irrigation-limiting strategy were assessed using the SWAT-GW model in the piedmont plain of the Taihang Mountains of North China Plain (NCP). Model calibration and validation were conducted using field data for spring maize (SPM) with a target NRMSE below 25%, alongside previously calibrated parameters for winter wheat (WW), summer maize (SUM), evapotranspiration, and groundwater levels. Historical simulations (1993–2012) indicated that a two-year-three-crop cropping system (WW-SUM → SPM) with 82 mm of irrigation quota (3H2Y_O, “double-reducing strategy”) maintained shallow groundwater levels while accepting a 27% yield reduction. Future simulation (2030–2049) suggest that increased groundwater recharge due to climate change might allow shallow groundwater balance through the irrigation-limiting strategy alone (“single-reducing strategy”), with crop yields expected to rise by 5.8%–6.9% for wheat and 1.2%–2.3% for maize. By 2070–2089, enhanced precipitation could lead to sufficient groundwater recharge, enabling equilibrium under a double-cropping system (WW-SUM) with full irrigation scheme (“non-reducing strategy”) in most areas. Wheat yields may increase by 9.7%–10.5%, but maize yields could fall by 1.1%–10.9%. This study could provide detailed data for groundwater recovery planning in China’s grain-producing regions, and offer a methodological framework for the trade-off between water scarcity and food security for other over-exploited groundwater areas worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"647 ","pages":"Article 132352"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424017487","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global crisis of groundwater depletion is becoming a challenge in irrigation agriculture. How to optimize the agricultural system amidst climate change is crucial for groundwater and food security around the world. In this study, the multiple cropping index (MCI) reducing strategy and irrigation-limiting strategy were assessed using the SWAT-GW model in the piedmont plain of the Taihang Mountains of North China Plain (NCP). Model calibration and validation were conducted using field data for spring maize (SPM) with a target NRMSE below 25%, alongside previously calibrated parameters for winter wheat (WW), summer maize (SUM), evapotranspiration, and groundwater levels. Historical simulations (1993–2012) indicated that a two-year-three-crop cropping system (WW-SUM → SPM) with 82 mm of irrigation quota (3H2Y_O, “double-reducing strategy”) maintained shallow groundwater levels while accepting a 27% yield reduction. Future simulation (2030–2049) suggest that increased groundwater recharge due to climate change might allow shallow groundwater balance through the irrigation-limiting strategy alone (“single-reducing strategy”), with crop yields expected to rise by 5.8%–6.9% for wheat and 1.2%–2.3% for maize. By 2070–2089, enhanced precipitation could lead to sufficient groundwater recharge, enabling equilibrium under a double-cropping system (WW-SUM) with full irrigation scheme (“non-reducing strategy”) in most areas. Wheat yields may increase by 9.7%–10.5%, but maize yields could fall by 1.1%–10.9%. This study could provide detailed data for groundwater recovery planning in China’s grain-producing regions, and offer a methodological framework for the trade-off between water scarcity and food security for other over-exploited groundwater areas worldwide.

Abstract Image

如何阻止华北平原地下水减少?农业管理策略与气候变化相结合
全球地下水枯竭危机正成为灌溉农业面临的挑战。如何在气候变化中优化农业系统对全球地下水和粮食安全至关重要。本研究利用 SWAT-GW 模型对华北平原(NCP)太行山腹地平原的多作物指数(MCI)减少策略和灌溉限制策略进行了评估。利用春玉米(SPM)的田间数据对模型进行了校准和验证,目标 NRMSE 低于 25%,同时还使用了之前校准的冬小麦(WW)、夏玉米(SUM)、蒸散量和地下水位参数。历史模拟(1993-2012 年)表明,灌溉配额为 82 毫米(3H2Y_O,"双减策略")的两年三季作物种植系统(WW-SUM → SPM)可维持浅层地下水位,同时减产 27%。未来(2030-2049 年)的模拟结果表明,气候变化导致的地下水补给增加可能会使仅采用限制灌溉策略("单减量策略")的浅层地下水水位保持平衡,小麦产量预计将增加 5.8%-6.9%,玉米产量预计将增加 1.2%-2.3%。到 2070-2089 年,降水量的增加可能会导致地下水的充分补给,从而在大多数地区实现全面灌溉计划("非减量策略")下的双种植系统(WW-SUM)平衡。小麦产量可能增加 9.7%-10.5%,但玉米产量可能减少 1.1%-10.9%。这项研究可为中国粮食主产区的地下水恢复规划提供详细数据,并为全球其他地下水过度开发地区在水资源短缺与粮食安全之间进行权衡提供方法框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信