SPECT-CT may aid in determining which side of a revision stemmed implant problematic total knee replacement is loose when planning revision surgery

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Knee Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2024.10.016
Daniel Hill, Patrick Rogers, Jonathan Phillips, Ben Waterson, Andrew D. Toms
{"title":"SPECT-CT may aid in determining which side of a revision stemmed implant problematic total knee replacement is loose when planning revision surgery","authors":"Daniel Hill,&nbsp;Patrick Rogers,&nbsp;Jonathan Phillips,&nbsp;Ben Waterson,&nbsp;Andrew D. Toms","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.10.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate SPECT-CT in the diagnosis of single component aseptic loosening in patients with a problematic cemented stemmed TKR (Total Knee Replacement).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>SPECT-CT was performed where aseptic loosening was suspected but was not clear on plain radiography. Demographics, suspected diagnosis and intention to revise were collected prospectively before and after SPECT-CT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>30 patients were investigated. 43% (95% CI: 0.5–0.9) had clear evidence of loosening on SPECT-CT. In 23% (95% CI: 0.1–0.4) intention to perform revision surgery following SPECT-CT changed (7/30) (<em>p</em> = 0.0004, standard error = 42.1, <em>z</em> = 3.5).</div><div>Intentions to perform revision surgery according to the radiologist’s overall summary were:</div><div>Normal SPECT-CT – 0% (95% CI: 0.0–0.8) intention to revise (0/2).</div><div>Possibly abnormal SPECT-CT – 13% (95% CI: 0.0–0.4) intention to revise (2/15).</div><div>Definitely abnormal SPECT-CT – 77% (95% CI: 0.5–0.9) intention to revise (10/13).</div><div>We report that SPECT-CT had a test sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI: 0.6–1.0), a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 0.9–1.0), a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 97.7%.</div><div>In 70% (95% CI: 0.3–0.9) of cases where revision surgery was performed for aseptic loosening SPECT-CT provided information that guided pre-operative planning with regards single component or both component revision surgery (7/10).</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>When positive SPECT-CT was useful in determining single component revision. A normal SPECT-CT may have a negative predictive value; however, overall half of our series had a possibly abnormal or equivocal investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"52 ","pages":"Pages 179-194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate SPECT-CT in the diagnosis of single component aseptic loosening in patients with a problematic cemented stemmed TKR (Total Knee Replacement).

Methods

SPECT-CT was performed where aseptic loosening was suspected but was not clear on plain radiography. Demographics, suspected diagnosis and intention to revise were collected prospectively before and after SPECT-CT.

Results

30 patients were investigated. 43% (95% CI: 0.5–0.9) had clear evidence of loosening on SPECT-CT. In 23% (95% CI: 0.1–0.4) intention to perform revision surgery following SPECT-CT changed (7/30) (p = 0.0004, standard error = 42.1, z = 3.5).
Intentions to perform revision surgery according to the radiologist’s overall summary were:
Normal SPECT-CT – 0% (95% CI: 0.0–0.8) intention to revise (0/2).
Possibly abnormal SPECT-CT – 13% (95% CI: 0.0–0.4) intention to revise (2/15).
Definitely abnormal SPECT-CT – 77% (95% CI: 0.5–0.9) intention to revise (10/13).
We report that SPECT-CT had a test sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI: 0.6–1.0), a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 0.9–1.0), a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 97.7%.
In 70% (95% CI: 0.3–0.9) of cases where revision surgery was performed for aseptic loosening SPECT-CT provided information that guided pre-operative planning with regards single component or both component revision surgery (7/10).

CONCLUSION

When positive SPECT-CT was useful in determining single component revision. A normal SPECT-CT may have a negative predictive value; however, overall half of our series had a possibly abnormal or equivocal investigation.
在计划翻修手术时,SPECT-CT 可帮助确定翻修干式植入物问题全膝关节置换术哪一侧松动
目的评估SPECT-CT在诊断有问题的骨水泥柄全膝关节置换术(TKR)患者单个组件无菌性松动中的作用。在 SPECT-CT 前后,前瞻性地收集了患者的人口统计学资料、疑似诊断和复查意向。43%(95% CI:0.5-0.9)的患者在 SPECT-CT 上有明确的松动证据。23%(95% CI:0.1-0.4)的患者(7/30)在SPECT-CT检查后进行翻修手术的意向发生了变化(p = 0.0004,标准误差 = 42.1,z = 3.5)。根据放射科医生的总体总结,进行翻修手术的意向为:SPECT-CT检查正常 - 0%(95% CI:0.SPECT-CT可能异常--13%(95% CI:0.0-0.4)有修改意向(2/15).SPECT-CT肯定异常--77%(95% CI:0.5-0.9)有修改意向(10/13)。我们报告称,SPECT-CT 的检测灵敏度为 90.9%(95% CI:0.6-1.0),特异性为 100%(95% CI:0.9-1.0),阳性预测值为 100%,阴性预测值为 97.7%。在70%(95% CI:0.3-0.9)因无菌性松动而进行翻修手术的病例中,SPECT-CT提供的信息可指导单个组件或两个组件翻修手术的术前计划(7/10)。正常的SPECT-CT可能具有阴性预测价值;但是,在我们的系列研究中,有一半的研究结果可能异常或不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信