Modification on constant temperature boundary considering conjugate heat transfer of brine turbulent flow in brine artificial ground freezing method

IF 6.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS
Wang Wu , Zhaowei Ding , Qixiang Yan , Zechang Zhao
{"title":"Modification on constant temperature boundary considering conjugate heat transfer of brine turbulent flow in brine artificial ground freezing method","authors":"Wang Wu ,&nbsp;Zhaowei Ding ,&nbsp;Qixiang Yan ,&nbsp;Zechang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2024.108387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The brine artificial ground freezing (AGF) method is an effective construction technique extensively employed in underground engineering reinforcement. In the numerical simulation of soil temperature field associated with the brine-AGF method, researchers typically impose a constant temperature boundary on the surface of the freezing pipe. This approach circumvents the need to simulate brine flow, thereby simplifying the numerical simulation and enhancing computational efficiency. However, questions arise regarding the accuracy of these simulations: Is the soil temperature field consistent with a constant temperature boundary model when considering brine flow? These concerns remain unresolved at present. Consequently, based on the conjugate heat transfer mechanisms, this paper establishes a numerical model for coupling brine-freezing pipe-soil to analyze variations in soil temperature fields under brine turbulent conditions. Compared to the constant temperature boundary model, it was observed that overall soil temperatures in the brine turbulent flow model are generally lower. However, they are 4 °C higher at the bottom of the freezing pipe. Therefore, this paper proposes a modified temperature boundary that incorporates both Reynold's number of brine and freezing pipe depth considerations. Results indicate that this modified temperature boundary yields a soil temperature field closely aligned with that produced by brine flow models. Furthermore, compared with the model test, the modified temperature boundary can respectively reduce the temperature difference from 3.4 °C to 2.1 °C and from 1.5 °C to 0.3 °C when the different brine flow velocities are considered. The proposed modified temperature boundary not only retains advantages such as simplified modeling and rapid computation inherent in constant temperature boundary but also enhances calculation accuracy significantly. This work provides valuable insights for advancements in brine-AGF engineering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":332,"journal":{"name":"International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 108387"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735193324011497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The brine artificial ground freezing (AGF) method is an effective construction technique extensively employed in underground engineering reinforcement. In the numerical simulation of soil temperature field associated with the brine-AGF method, researchers typically impose a constant temperature boundary on the surface of the freezing pipe. This approach circumvents the need to simulate brine flow, thereby simplifying the numerical simulation and enhancing computational efficiency. However, questions arise regarding the accuracy of these simulations: Is the soil temperature field consistent with a constant temperature boundary model when considering brine flow? These concerns remain unresolved at present. Consequently, based on the conjugate heat transfer mechanisms, this paper establishes a numerical model for coupling brine-freezing pipe-soil to analyze variations in soil temperature fields under brine turbulent conditions. Compared to the constant temperature boundary model, it was observed that overall soil temperatures in the brine turbulent flow model are generally lower. However, they are 4 °C higher at the bottom of the freezing pipe. Therefore, this paper proposes a modified temperature boundary that incorporates both Reynold's number of brine and freezing pipe depth considerations. Results indicate that this modified temperature boundary yields a soil temperature field closely aligned with that produced by brine flow models. Furthermore, compared with the model test, the modified temperature boundary can respectively reduce the temperature difference from 3.4 °C to 2.1 °C and from 1.5 °C to 0.3 °C when the different brine flow velocities are considered. The proposed modified temperature boundary not only retains advantages such as simplified modeling and rapid computation inherent in constant temperature boundary but also enhances calculation accuracy significantly. This work provides valuable insights for advancements in brine-AGF engineering.
盐水人工地面冻结法中考虑盐水湍流共轭传热的恒温边界修改
盐水人工地面冻结(AGF)法是地下工程加固中广泛采用的一种有效施工技术。在对与盐水-AGF 法相关的土壤温度场进行数值模拟时,研究人员通常会在冻结管表面施加一个恒温边界。这种方法无需模拟盐水流动,从而简化了数值模拟并提高了计算效率。然而,这些模拟的准确性也存在问题:在考虑盐水流动时,土壤温度场是否与恒温边界模型一致?这些问题目前仍未得到解决。因此,本文基于共轭传热机理,建立了盐水冻结管道-土壤耦合数值模型,分析盐水湍流条件下土壤温度场的变化。与恒温边界模型相比,盐水湍流模型中的整体土壤温度普遍较低。但是,在冷冻管底部的温度要高出 4 ℃。因此,本文提出了一种修改后的温度边界,将盐水的雷诺数和冻结管深度都考虑在内。结果表明,修改后的温度边界所产生的土壤温度场与盐水流模型所产生的土壤温度场非常接近。此外,与模型试验相比,当考虑到不同的盐水流速时,修改后的温度边界可分别将温差从 3.4 ℃ 降至 2.1 ℃ 和从 1.5 ℃ 降至 0.3 ℃。所提出的修正温度边界不仅保留了恒温边界固有的简化建模和快速计算等优点,还显著提高了计算精度。这项工作为盐水-AGF 工程的发展提供了宝贵的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
648
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer serves as a world forum for the rapid dissemination of new ideas, new measurement techniques, preliminary findings of ongoing investigations, discussions, and criticisms in the field of heat and mass transfer. Two types of manuscript will be considered for publication: communications (short reports of new work or discussions of work which has already been published) and summaries (abstracts of reports, theses or manuscripts which are too long for publication in full). Together with its companion publication, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, with which it shares the same Board of Editors, this journal is read by research workers and engineers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信