Short-term androgen deprivation therapy and high-dose radiotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: Results from the GETUG 14 randomized phase III trial
N. Demogeot , P. Sargos , N. Sahki , S. Guérif , R. De Crevoisier , G. Calais , J.M. Hannoun Levi , G. Bouche , C. Hennequin , J. Cretin , Y. Belkacemi , J. Khalifa , D. Azria , A. Grandgirard , P. Pommier , J.M. Simon , C. Leger , V. Beckendorf , B. Dubray , S. Supiot
{"title":"Short-term androgen deprivation therapy and high-dose radiotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: Results from the GETUG 14 randomized phase III trial","authors":"N. Demogeot , P. Sargos , N. Sahki , S. Guérif , R. De Crevoisier , G. Calais , J.M. Hannoun Levi , G. Bouche , C. Hennequin , J. Cretin , Y. Belkacemi , J. Khalifa , D. Azria , A. Grandgirard , P. Pommier , J.M. Simon , C. Leger , V. Beckendorf , B. Dubray , S. Supiot","doi":"10.1016/j.fpurol.2024.07.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Few studies compared short-term androgen deprivation (STADT) with high-dose radiotherapy (STADT-RT) versus high dose radiotherapy (RT) alone in localized prostate cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The GETUG 14 study randomized 376 patients between RT (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->191) and STADT-RT (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->179). RT dose was 80<!--> <!-->Gy in both arms and STADT was 4-month flutamide, starting 2 months before irradiation and 4-month triptorelin, starting with irradiation. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), toxicity and quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a median follow-up of 84 months, five-year DFS was 76% in RT arm versus 84% in STADT-RT arm (hazard radio (HR)<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.64; (95% CI 0.43–0.89); <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02). ADT had a positive impact on BFS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.45; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001) and MFS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.5; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.09) but not on OS (HR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.22; <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.54). No difference was fond in terms of gastro intestinal (26% of grade<!--> <!-->><!--> <!-->1 in both arm, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.97) and genito-urinary toxicity (39% for RT and 42% for STADT-RT, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.55). Similarly, no difference was found in quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>STADT improves DFS in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving high dose (80<!--> <!-->Gy) RT, without any deterioration in the safety profile.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34947,"journal":{"name":"Progres en Urologie - FMC","volume":"34 7","pages":"Page S36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progres en Urologie - FMC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761676X24001585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Few studies compared short-term androgen deprivation (STADT) with high-dose radiotherapy (STADT-RT) versus high dose radiotherapy (RT) alone in localized prostate cancer.
Methods
The GETUG 14 study randomized 376 patients between RT (n = 191) and STADT-RT (n = 179). RT dose was 80 Gy in both arms and STADT was 4-month flutamide, starting 2 months before irradiation and 4-month triptorelin, starting with irradiation. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), toxicity and quality of life.
Results
With a median follow-up of 84 months, five-year DFS was 76% in RT arm versus 84% in STADT-RT arm (hazard radio (HR) = 0.64; (95% CI 0.43–0.89); P = 0.02). ADT had a positive impact on BFS (HR = 0.45; P = 0.001) and MFS (HR = 0.5; P = 0.09) but not on OS (HR = 1.22; P = 0.54). No difference was fond in terms of gastro intestinal (26% of grade > 1 in both arm, P = 0.97) and genito-urinary toxicity (39% for RT and 42% for STADT-RT, P = 0.55). Similarly, no difference was found in quality of life.
Conclusion
STADT improves DFS in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving high dose (80 Gy) RT, without any deterioration in the safety profile.