The social construction of mental illness stigma amongst Asians: A systematic review and meta-ethnography

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Athel J. Hu , Pearlyn Neo , Amanda Soon , Harry Tan , Yuxin He , Rayner Kay Jin Tan
{"title":"The social construction of mental illness stigma amongst Asians: A systematic review and meta-ethnography","authors":"Athel J. Hu ,&nbsp;Pearlyn Neo ,&nbsp;Amanda Soon ,&nbsp;Harry Tan ,&nbsp;Yuxin He ,&nbsp;Rayner Kay Jin Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Known to be discrediting and discriminatory in nature, scholars have argued that the impact of stigma against persons with lived experiences of mental illnesses (PWLEs) is far worse than living with the symptoms of the conditions itself. Particularly in Asia where mental illnesses tend to be highly moralized, where PWLEs are often conceived as displaying poor character due to Confucius ideology or religious reasons, evidence has shown that stigma against PWLEs is much stronger in Asia than in the Western contexts. Currently, there is limited insights on the origins of mental illness stigma and how stigma is constructed into moralized forms and perpetuated across society. Underpinned by social constructionism, this systematic review and meta-ethnography paper undertook a theory-driven approach to address ‘how is mental illness stigma socially constructed amongst Asians?’ Systematic search for primary qualitative research journal papers was conducted across six databases (PubMed; Embase; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Social Science Database; SCOPUS), yielding 4516 articles. 30 articles were identified for synthesis. Results revealed how historical context of governmental (colonialism; Confucius ideology; industrialization) and religious institutions and country-specific power elites and individuals shaped the constructions of cultural stigma. Cultural stigma permeates societies through culturally dependent language via word-of-mouth (facilitated by collectivism) and media into forms of public stigma, causing a lack of trust between public and PWLEs. Individuals in societies further perpetuate stigma by means of interpreting, labelling anomalies and discriminating PWLEs based on preconceived learnt cultural prejudices that are activated during social interactions, further reinforcing public stigma. Finally, while most PWLEs anticipate stigma and self-stigmatize due to internalization of cultural and public stigma, unique to this study, a small group of PWLEs was able to resist and contest stigma due to holding socially valued roles that <em>‘matter most’</em>. Recommendations for destigmatization strategies are suggested in view of these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100371"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Known to be discrediting and discriminatory in nature, scholars have argued that the impact of stigma against persons with lived experiences of mental illnesses (PWLEs) is far worse than living with the symptoms of the conditions itself. Particularly in Asia where mental illnesses tend to be highly moralized, where PWLEs are often conceived as displaying poor character due to Confucius ideology or religious reasons, evidence has shown that stigma against PWLEs is much stronger in Asia than in the Western contexts. Currently, there is limited insights on the origins of mental illness stigma and how stigma is constructed into moralized forms and perpetuated across society. Underpinned by social constructionism, this systematic review and meta-ethnography paper undertook a theory-driven approach to address ‘how is mental illness stigma socially constructed amongst Asians?’ Systematic search for primary qualitative research journal papers was conducted across six databases (PubMed; Embase; PsycINFO; CINAHL; Social Science Database; SCOPUS), yielding 4516 articles. 30 articles were identified for synthesis. Results revealed how historical context of governmental (colonialism; Confucius ideology; industrialization) and religious institutions and country-specific power elites and individuals shaped the constructions of cultural stigma. Cultural stigma permeates societies through culturally dependent language via word-of-mouth (facilitated by collectivism) and media into forms of public stigma, causing a lack of trust between public and PWLEs. Individuals in societies further perpetuate stigma by means of interpreting, labelling anomalies and discriminating PWLEs based on preconceived learnt cultural prejudices that are activated during social interactions, further reinforcing public stigma. Finally, while most PWLEs anticipate stigma and self-stigmatize due to internalization of cultural and public stigma, unique to this study, a small group of PWLEs was able to resist and contest stigma due to holding socially valued roles that ‘matter most’. Recommendations for destigmatization strategies are suggested in view of these findings.
亚洲人对精神疾病污名化的社会建构:系统回顾与元民族志
众所周知,成见具有诋毁和歧视的性质,有学者认为,对有精神疾病生活经历者(PWLEs)的成见所造成的影响远比精神疾病的症状本身更糟糕。特别是在亚洲,精神疾病往往被高度道德化,由于孔子思想或宗教原因,PWLEs 往往被视为品行不端。目前,人们对精神疾病成见的起源以及成见是如何被建构为道德化形式并在全社会延续的认识还很有限。在社会建构主义的支持下,这篇系统性综述和元民族志论文采用了理论驱动的方法来探讨 "精神疾病成见是如何在亚洲人中进行社会建构的?在六个数据库(PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、社会科学数据库、SCOPUS)中对主要定性研究期刊论文进行了系统检索,共检索到 4516 篇文章。最后确定了 30 篇文章进行综述。研究结果揭示了政府(殖民主义;孔子思想;工业化)和宗教机构的历史背景以及特定国家的权力精英和个人是如何塑造文化成见的。文化成见通过依赖于文化的语言,通过口口相传(集体主义的推动)和媒体渗透到社会中,成为公众成见的形式,导致公众和公共生活教育机构之间缺乏信任。社会中的个人根据先入为主的、在社会交往中被激活的文化偏见,对异常现象进行解释、贴标签和歧视,进一步加深了公众对残疾人的成见。最后,虽然大多数残疾人由于文化和公众成见的内化而预期会受到成见和自我鄙视,但在本研究中,有一小部分残疾人由于扮演了 "最重要 "的社会角色而能够抵制和对抗成见。鉴于这些研究结果,我们提出了消除鄙视战略的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信