Falsely abnormal serum protein electrophoresis after administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG): A retrospective cohort study

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Andrew Sulaiman, Patrizio Caturegli
{"title":"Falsely abnormal serum protein electrophoresis after administration of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG): A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Andrew Sulaiman,&nbsp;Patrizio Caturegli","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy, used in several neurologic, hematologic, immunologic and dermatologic conditions, is known to interfere with the results of some serum laboratory tests. We analyzed the potential interference of IVIG on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) by reviewing more than a decade of SPEP studies performed by the clinical immunology laboratory of the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Of the total 100,350 SPEP performed between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2023, 395 contained the keyword IVIG in the pathologist report, contributed by 348 patients confirmed to have received IVIG by chart review. Of the 348 patients, 20 (6 %) had a M-spike on SPEP suggestive of monoclonal gammopathy, while 328 (94 %) did not have it. Of the 20 patients, 14 received IVIG within 30 days from the SPEP collection date, while 6 received beyond 30 days. Serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE) and clinical follow up showed no evidence of monoclonal gammopathy in 5 of the 14 patients. Overall, this 11-year retrospective cohort study showed that 5 of 348 (1.4 %) patients treated with IVIG and tested by SPEP had a false M-spike, that is a spike not confirmed to be caused by a monoclonal gammopathy by subsequent studies. Although small, the false positive rate of 1.4 % suggests that integrating knowledge of recent IVIG administration into the pathologist report would reduce SPEP misdiagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article e00434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy, used in several neurologic, hematologic, immunologic and dermatologic conditions, is known to interfere with the results of some serum laboratory tests. We analyzed the potential interference of IVIG on serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) by reviewing more than a decade of SPEP studies performed by the clinical immunology laboratory of the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Of the total 100,350 SPEP performed between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2023, 395 contained the keyword IVIG in the pathologist report, contributed by 348 patients confirmed to have received IVIG by chart review. Of the 348 patients, 20 (6 %) had a M-spike on SPEP suggestive of monoclonal gammopathy, while 328 (94 %) did not have it. Of the 20 patients, 14 received IVIG within 30 days from the SPEP collection date, while 6 received beyond 30 days. Serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE) and clinical follow up showed no evidence of monoclonal gammopathy in 5 of the 14 patients. Overall, this 11-year retrospective cohort study showed that 5 of 348 (1.4 %) patients treated with IVIG and tested by SPEP had a false M-spike, that is a spike not confirmed to be caused by a monoclonal gammopathy by subsequent studies. Although small, the false positive rate of 1.4 % suggests that integrating knowledge of recent IVIG administration into the pathologist report would reduce SPEP misdiagnosis.
静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)后血清蛋白电泳异常:回顾性队列研究
众所周知,静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)疗法会干扰某些血清实验室检测的结果,该疗法可用于多种神经、血液、免疫和皮肤病的治疗。我们通过回顾约翰霍普金斯医院临床免疫学实验室十多年来进行的 SPEP 研究,分析了 IVIG 对血清蛋白电泳(SPEP)的潜在干扰。在 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日期间进行的总共 100,350 例 SPEP 中,有 395 例病理学家报告中包含 IVIG 关键字,其中 348 例患者通过病历审查确认接受了 IVIG 治疗。在这 348 名患者中,有 20 人(6%)在 SPEP 中出现了提示单克隆性腺病的 M 峰,而 328 人(94%)没有出现 M 峰。在这 20 名患者中,14 人在 SPEP 采集日期后 30 天内接受了 IVIG 治疗,6 人在 30 天后接受了 IVIG 治疗。血清免疫固定电泳(SIFE)和临床随访显示,14 名患者中有 5 人未发现单克隆抗体病。总体而言,这项为期 11 年的回顾性队列研究显示,在 348 例接受 IVIG 治疗并接受 SPEP 检测的患者中,有 5 例(1.4%)出现了假 M-棘波,即后续研究未证实是由单克隆丙种球蛋白病引起的棘波。1.4% 的假阳性率虽然很小,但表明将近期 IVIG 用药知识纳入病理学家报告可减少 SPEP 误诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信