Sense of place in providers’ perspectives of school placement policies in relation to refugee settlement in rural Sweden

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Per-Åke Rosvall , Elisabet Öhrn , Dennis Beach , Monica Johansson , Maria Rönnlund
{"title":"Sense of place in providers’ perspectives of school placement policies in relation to refugee settlement in rural Sweden","authors":"Per-Åke Rosvall ,&nbsp;Elisabet Öhrn ,&nbsp;Dennis Beach ,&nbsp;Monica Johansson ,&nbsp;Maria Rönnlund","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the initial phase of the refugee wave in 2015 rural municipalities in Sweden were obliged for the first time to receive refugees. Some rural officials welcomed refugees in hopes that it would counter population declines and future staffing problems. Some officials also referred to rural areas as idylls for reception, well equipped for reception arguing that small places are better for integration. This raised placement issues, which varied widely among three identified categories of municipalities (tourist towns and/or sparsely populated areas, de/industrialised towns, and small villages). We explored these issues by interviewing respondents in 21 municipalities. We selected three municipalities to represent the three categories and analysed responses of our informants within them to obtain insights into their views of the refugees' reception and associated issues. For this we applied a Masseyian ‘sense of place’ and ‘power geometry’ theoretical framework. Wide variations among municipalities were reported. However, common themes included: a lack of relevant training initially; rapid establishment of organisational arrangements and competences; segregation in some municipalities due to placement in segregated housing (which raised informants' awareness of social class-based divisions); and changes in status or requirements for migrants to relocate (with very little warning) that severely impacted the refugees' transitions. The results clearly indicate needs for more long-term and robust policies to avoid problems associated with refugees' ‘liminal citizenship’ and weak power, with consequent impacts on their educational transitions and subsequent prospects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 103509"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016724003139","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the initial phase of the refugee wave in 2015 rural municipalities in Sweden were obliged for the first time to receive refugees. Some rural officials welcomed refugees in hopes that it would counter population declines and future staffing problems. Some officials also referred to rural areas as idylls for reception, well equipped for reception arguing that small places are better for integration. This raised placement issues, which varied widely among three identified categories of municipalities (tourist towns and/or sparsely populated areas, de/industrialised towns, and small villages). We explored these issues by interviewing respondents in 21 municipalities. We selected three municipalities to represent the three categories and analysed responses of our informants within them to obtain insights into their views of the refugees' reception and associated issues. For this we applied a Masseyian ‘sense of place’ and ‘power geometry’ theoretical framework. Wide variations among municipalities were reported. However, common themes included: a lack of relevant training initially; rapid establishment of organisational arrangements and competences; segregation in some municipalities due to placement in segregated housing (which raised informants' awareness of social class-based divisions); and changes in status or requirements for migrants to relocate (with very little warning) that severely impacted the refugees' transitions. The results clearly indicate needs for more long-term and robust policies to avoid problems associated with refugees' ‘liminal citizenship’ and weak power, with consequent impacts on their educational transitions and subsequent prospects.
在瑞典农村地区难民安置问题上,教育者对学校安置政策的看法中的地方感
在2015年难民潮的最初阶段,瑞典的农村市镇首次不得不接收难民。一些农村官员对难民表示欢迎,希望以此应对人口减少和未来的人员配置问题。一些官员还将农村地区称为接收难民的田园,认为小地方更有利于融入社会,并为接收难民提供了良好的条件。这就提出了安置问题,这三类城市(旅游城镇和/或人口稀少地区、工业化城镇和小村庄)的安置情况大相径庭。我们对 21 个城市的受访者进行了访谈,对这些问题进行了探讨。我们选择了三个城市作为这三类城市的代表,并对其中受访者的回答进行了分析,以深入了解他们对难民接待及相关问题的看法。为此,我们采用了马西的 "地方感 "和 "权力几何 "理论框架。据报告,各城市之间存在很大差异。然而,共同的主题包括:最初缺乏相关培训;快速建立组织安排和能力;在一些城市,由于安置在隔离的住房中,造成了隔离(这提高了信息提供者对社会阶级分化的认识);身份的变化或对移民搬迁的要求(几乎没有预警)严重影响了难民的过渡。研究结果清楚地表明,需要制定更加长期和有力的政策,以避免出现与难民的 "边缘公民身份 "和弱势权力相关的问题,从而对他们的教育过渡和未来前景产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信