Cogeneration processes based on giant reed gasification combined with ORC and district heating for heat recovery: Comparative energy and exergy analysis

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Mauro Prestipino , Antonio Piccolo , Carlos Mourao Vilela , Antonio Galvagno
{"title":"Cogeneration processes based on giant reed gasification combined with ORC and district heating for heat recovery: Comparative energy and exergy analysis","authors":"Mauro Prestipino ,&nbsp;Antonio Piccolo ,&nbsp;Carlos Mourao Vilela ,&nbsp;Antonio Galvagno","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research work develops a comprehensive exergy and energy assessment of a cogeneration process using Giant Reed as feedstock, which consists of a biomass dryer, a fluidized bed gasifier, an internal combustion engine operating in a cogeneration mode (CHP), and two different users for the cogenerated heat. One process layout uses cogenerated heat in a district heating network (CHP + DH layout). In the second process layout, the cogenerated heat produces additional electricity through an Organic Rankine Cycle (CHP + ORC layout). In addition to the performance of reed gasification (cold gas efficiency about 0.6), the results showed that the highest rational efficiency was reached in the cogeneration unit, while the highest relative irreversibilities were found in the gasifier and the dryer. The overall energy efficiencies are 0.46 and 0.22 for the CHP + DH and CHP + ORC layouts, respectively, while the overall exergy efficiencies are 0.21 and 0.20. The difference in the sustainability index is just 2 %. The results and methods of this research work can be used to properly design Giant Reed (or similar biomass) gasification plants and bioenergy systems for combined heat and power production, and developing case-studies considering the sustainable use of this feedstock according to a thermodynamic approach based on the second principle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 121944"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124020123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research work develops a comprehensive exergy and energy assessment of a cogeneration process using Giant Reed as feedstock, which consists of a biomass dryer, a fluidized bed gasifier, an internal combustion engine operating in a cogeneration mode (CHP), and two different users for the cogenerated heat. One process layout uses cogenerated heat in a district heating network (CHP + DH layout). In the second process layout, the cogenerated heat produces additional electricity through an Organic Rankine Cycle (CHP + ORC layout). In addition to the performance of reed gasification (cold gas efficiency about 0.6), the results showed that the highest rational efficiency was reached in the cogeneration unit, while the highest relative irreversibilities were found in the gasifier and the dryer. The overall energy efficiencies are 0.46 and 0.22 for the CHP + DH and CHP + ORC layouts, respectively, while the overall exergy efficiencies are 0.21 and 0.20. The difference in the sustainability index is just 2 %. The results and methods of this research work can be used to properly design Giant Reed (or similar biomass) gasification plants and bioenergy systems for combined heat and power production, and developing case-studies considering the sustainable use of this feedstock according to a thermodynamic approach based on the second principle.
基于巨型芦苇气化的热电联产工艺,结合 ORC 和区域供热进行热量回收:能量和放能比较分析
这项研究工作对以巨芦苇为原料的热电联产工艺进行了全面的能效评估,该工艺由生物质干燥器、流化床气化炉、以热电联产模式运行的内燃机以及热电联产产生的热量的两个不同用户组成。一种工艺布局是在区域供热网络中使用热电联产热量(热电联产 + DH 布局)。在第二种工艺布局中,热电联产热量通过有机朗肯循环产生额外的电力(热电联产 + 有机朗肯循环布局)。除了芦苇气化的性能(冷气效率约为 0.6)外,结果表明热电联产装置的合理效率最高,而气化器和干燥器的相对不可逆性最高。热电联产 + DH 和热电联产 + ORC 布局的总体能效分别为 0.46 和 0.22,而总体放能效分别为 0.21 和 0.20。可持续发展指数仅相差 2%。这项研究工作的结果和方法可用于正确设计用于热电联产的巨人苇(或类似生物质)气化厂和生物能源系统,并根据基于第二原则的热力学方法,开发考虑到这种原料可持续利用的案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信