Cricothyroidotomy in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Matthew Humar , Benjamin Meadley , Bart Cresswell , Emily Nehme , Christopher Groombridge , David Anderson , Ziad Nehme
{"title":"Cricothyroidotomy in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study","authors":"Matthew Humar ,&nbsp;Benjamin Meadley ,&nbsp;Bart Cresswell ,&nbsp;Emily Nehme ,&nbsp;Christopher Groombridge ,&nbsp;David Anderson ,&nbsp;Ziad Nehme","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To describe the incidence, characteristics, success rates, and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients receiving cricothyroidotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Over an 18-year period, we retrospectively analysed patient care records and cardiac arrest registry data for cricothyroidotomy cases. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between study characteristics and cricothyroidotomy success.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 80 cricothyroidotomies, 56 of which occurred in OHCA. The incidence of cricothyroidotomy in OHCA was 1.1 per 1,000 attempted resuscitations and increased over the study period (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.13, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.25, p = 0.023). The overall success rate was 68.8 % (n = 55/80), with lower success in cardiac arrest (n = 33/56, 58.9 %) than non-cardiac arrest patients (n = 22/24, 91.7 %). In OHCA, success rates were higher for surgical compared to needle techniques (88.2 % vs. 54.6 %, p = 0.003). Cardiac arrest (odds ratio [OR] 0.09, 95 % CI 0.16–0.51) and needle techniques (OR 0.11, 95 % CI 0.02–0.56) were independently associated with lower odds of procedural success, while male sex (OR 10.06, 95 % CI 2.00–50.62) was associated with higher odds. Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in 44.6 % (n = 22/56), with 35.7 % (n = 20/56) surviving to hospital and 7.1 % (n = 4/56) surviving to hospital discharge. Procedural complications included cardiac arrest (n = 6/56, 10.7 %), minor bleeding (n = 5/56, 8.9 %), surgical emphysema (n = 3/56, 5.4 %), and major bleeding (n = 2/56, 3.6 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found cricothyroidotomy in OHCA to be associated with low rates of procedural success and high mortality rates. Further studies are required to assess the role and potential benefits of cricothyroidotomy in cardiac arrest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424002844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To describe the incidence, characteristics, success rates, and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients receiving cricothyroidotomy.

Methods

Over an 18-year period, we retrospectively analysed patient care records and cardiac arrest registry data for cricothyroidotomy cases. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine associations between study characteristics and cricothyroidotomy success.

Results

We identified 80 cricothyroidotomies, 56 of which occurred in OHCA. The incidence of cricothyroidotomy in OHCA was 1.1 per 1,000 attempted resuscitations and increased over the study period (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.13, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.25, p = 0.023). The overall success rate was 68.8 % (n = 55/80), with lower success in cardiac arrest (n = 33/56, 58.9 %) than non-cardiac arrest patients (n = 22/24, 91.7 %). In OHCA, success rates were higher for surgical compared to needle techniques (88.2 % vs. 54.6 %, p = 0.003). Cardiac arrest (odds ratio [OR] 0.09, 95 % CI 0.16–0.51) and needle techniques (OR 0.11, 95 % CI 0.02–0.56) were independently associated with lower odds of procedural success, while male sex (OR 10.06, 95 % CI 2.00–50.62) was associated with higher odds. Return of spontaneous circulation occurred in 44.6 % (n = 22/56), with 35.7 % (n = 20/56) surviving to hospital and 7.1 % (n = 4/56) surviving to hospital discharge. Procedural complications included cardiac arrest (n = 6/56, 10.7 %), minor bleeding (n = 5/56, 8.9 %), surgical emphysema (n = 3/56, 5.4 %), and major bleeding (n = 2/56, 3.6 %).

Conclusion

We found cricothyroidotomy in OHCA to be associated with low rates of procedural success and high mortality rates. Further studies are required to assess the role and potential benefits of cricothyroidotomy in cardiac arrest.
院外心脏骤停的环甲膜切开术:观察性研究
目的描述接受环甲膜切开术的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的发病率、特征、成功率和预后。方法在 18 年间,我们回顾性分析了环甲膜切开术病例的患者护理记录和心脏骤停登记数据。结果我们发现了 80 例环甲膜切开术,其中 56 例发生在 OHCA 患者中。环甲膜切开术在 OHCA 中的发生率为每 1,000 例复苏尝试中有 1.1 例,且在研究期间有所上升(发生率比 [IRR] = 1.13,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.02-1.25,P<0.05):1.02-1.25, p = 0.023).总体成功率为 68.8%(n = 55/80),心脏骤停患者的成功率(n = 33/56,58.9%)低于非心脏骤停患者(n = 22/24,91.7%)。在 OHCA 患者中,手术成功率高于针刺技术(88.2% 对 54.6%,P = 0.003)。心脏骤停(几率比 [OR] 0.09,95 % CI 0.16-0.51)和针刺技术(OR 0.11,95 % CI 0.02-0.56)与手术成功几率较低独立相关,而男性(OR 10.06,95 % CI 2.00-50.62)与手术成功几率较高相关。自发循环恢复率为44.6%(n=22/56),其中35.7%(n=20/56)存活至住院,7.1%(n=4/56)存活至出院。手术并发症包括心脏骤停(n = 6/56,10.7%)、轻微出血(n = 5/56,8.9%)、手术气肿(n = 3/56,5.4%)和大出血(n = 2/56,3.6%)。需要进一步研究来评估环甲膜切开术在心脏骤停中的作用和潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信