Net-zero farming: Trigeneration with carbon capture and storage

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Zhaozhao Tang , Davina Vallabh , Yaodong Wang , Ye Huang , Jing-Cheng Han , Yang Zhou , Linlin Wang , Muhammad Ahmad , Maryam Yousaf , Yuchen Wang , Yuefei Huang
{"title":"Net-zero farming: Trigeneration with carbon capture and storage","authors":"Zhaozhao Tang ,&nbsp;Davina Vallabh ,&nbsp;Yaodong Wang ,&nbsp;Ye Huang ,&nbsp;Jing-Cheng Han ,&nbsp;Yang Zhou ,&nbsp;Linlin Wang ,&nbsp;Muhammad Ahmad ,&nbsp;Maryam Yousaf ,&nbsp;Yuchen Wang ,&nbsp;Yuefei Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.renene.2024.121898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aiming to achieve net-zero farming, this study explores the potential of anaerobic digestion of various biowastes to produce biogas for meeting the energy demands of a dairy farm, including electricity, heating, and cooling. Two options were investigated: Option 1 focuses solely on meeting the farm's energy demand, while Option 2 focuses on a big system that utilizes all available biowastes to produce biogas, with surplus electricity sold back to grid. These options were modelled using ECLIPSE software and evaluated in terms of practicality, environmental impact, and economic viability. Option 2, employing trigeneration, achieved an overall efficiency of 80.0 %, significantly higher than Option 1's 48.4 %. However, the efficiencies of the combined heat and power (CHP) system for Option 1 and 2 were 62.2 % and 81.1 %, respectively, both higher than their corresponding trigeneration. Option 2 also produced a greater annual carbon dioxide offset of 4206 Ton CO<sub>2</sub>-eq compared to 299 Ton CO<sub>2</sub>-eq for Option 1 by leveraging digestive fertilizers and carbon capture and storage technology (CCS). Finally, it was found that the payback period for Option 1 was projected at 11 years while Option 2 would require 12 years, with anticipated profits of £124,900 and £891,900 for Options 1 and 2, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":419,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 121898"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124019669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aiming to achieve net-zero farming, this study explores the potential of anaerobic digestion of various biowastes to produce biogas for meeting the energy demands of a dairy farm, including electricity, heating, and cooling. Two options were investigated: Option 1 focuses solely on meeting the farm's energy demand, while Option 2 focuses on a big system that utilizes all available biowastes to produce biogas, with surplus electricity sold back to grid. These options were modelled using ECLIPSE software and evaluated in terms of practicality, environmental impact, and economic viability. Option 2, employing trigeneration, achieved an overall efficiency of 80.0 %, significantly higher than Option 1's 48.4 %. However, the efficiencies of the combined heat and power (CHP) system for Option 1 and 2 were 62.2 % and 81.1 %, respectively, both higher than their corresponding trigeneration. Option 2 also produced a greater annual carbon dioxide offset of 4206 Ton CO2-eq compared to 299 Ton CO2-eq for Option 1 by leveraging digestive fertilizers and carbon capture and storage technology (CCS). Finally, it was found that the payback period for Option 1 was projected at 11 years while Option 2 would require 12 years, with anticipated profits of £124,900 and £891,900 for Options 1 and 2, respectively.
零净农业:带碳捕获和碳存储的三联供
为了实现净零养殖,本研究探讨了厌氧消化各种生物废料产生沼气的潜力,以满足奶牛场的能源需求,包括电力、供暖和制冷。研究了两个方案:方案 1 仅侧重于满足牧场的能源需求,而方案 2 则侧重于利用所有可用生物废料生产沼气的大系统,并将剩余电力回售给电网。我们使用 ECLIPSE 软件对这些方案进行了建模,并从实用性、环境影响和经济可行性方面进行了评估。方案 2 采用三联供,总效率达到 80.0%,明显高于方案 1 的 48.4%。然而,方案 1 和 2 的热电联产系统效率分别为 62.2 % 和 81.1 %,均高于相应的三联供。此外,通过利用消化肥料和碳捕集与封存技术(CCS),与方案 1 的 299 吨二氧化碳当量相比,方案 2 每年产生的二氧化碳抵消量更大,达到 4206 吨二氧化碳当量。最后,研究发现,方案 1 的投资回收期预计为 11 年,而方案 2 则需要 12 年,方案 1 和方案 2 的预期利润分别为 124 900 英镑和 891 900 英镑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable Energy
Renewable Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
1955
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Renewable Energy journal is dedicated to advancing knowledge and disseminating insights on various topics and technologies within renewable energy systems and components. Our mission is to support researchers, engineers, economists, manufacturers, NGOs, associations, and societies in staying updated on new developments in their respective fields and applying alternative energy solutions to current practices. As an international, multidisciplinary journal in renewable energy engineering and research, we strive to be a premier peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of original research and reviews in the field of renewable energy. Join us in our endeavor to drive innovation and progress in sustainable energy solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信