Consequences of fire and grazing to conservation of arthropod functional diversity in a protected Afrotropical savanna

IF 4.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ludzula Mukwevho , Tatenda Dalu , Mduduzi Ndlovu , Frank Chidawanyika
{"title":"Consequences of fire and grazing to conservation of arthropod functional diversity in a protected Afrotropical savanna","authors":"Ludzula Mukwevho ,&nbsp;Tatenda Dalu ,&nbsp;Mduduzi Ndlovu ,&nbsp;Frank Chidawanyika","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fires and grazing disrupt the diversity and composition of biological organisms and their functions in the savannas. In the current study, we assessed the impact of fire and grazing intensities on the abundance, species richness and assemblages of eight functional groups of arthropods in Kruger National Park. Pitfalls and active searches were used to collect arthropods at the experimental burnt plots (EBPs) and grazed plots that were undisturbed, minimally or heavily disturbed in Mopane and Skukuza regions. Omnivores constituted the highest proportion (40 %) of individuals, whilst detritivores, granivores, hematophagous, herbivores, nectarivores, predators and scavengers constituted between 0.5 % and 31.4 %. The abundance, species richness and assemblages of different functional groups significantly varied among EBPs and grazed sites in Mopane and Skukuza. The abundance and species richness of arthropods were higher at EBPs compared to grazed plots in Mopane and Skukuza. Furthermore, abundance was higher at the undisturbed compared to disturbed plots and a contrary pattern was observed for species richness. Results showed a distinct variation in the assemblage of detritivores, nectarivores, omnivores and predators between EBPs and grazed plots, with a clear separation between Mopane and Skukuza. However, the composition of granivores and herbivores was neither influenced by fires nor grazing in the Mopane and Skukuza. The intensity of disturbances by fire and grazing failed to drive arthropod assemblages within different functional groups. We conclude that fire and grazing are potent drivers of assemblages of arthropod functional groups in Afrotropical savannas requiring evidence-based manipulation for the conservation of key species.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"301 ","pages":"Article 110885"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320724004476","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fires and grazing disrupt the diversity and composition of biological organisms and their functions in the savannas. In the current study, we assessed the impact of fire and grazing intensities on the abundance, species richness and assemblages of eight functional groups of arthropods in Kruger National Park. Pitfalls and active searches were used to collect arthropods at the experimental burnt plots (EBPs) and grazed plots that were undisturbed, minimally or heavily disturbed in Mopane and Skukuza regions. Omnivores constituted the highest proportion (40 %) of individuals, whilst detritivores, granivores, hematophagous, herbivores, nectarivores, predators and scavengers constituted between 0.5 % and 31.4 %. The abundance, species richness and assemblages of different functional groups significantly varied among EBPs and grazed sites in Mopane and Skukuza. The abundance and species richness of arthropods were higher at EBPs compared to grazed plots in Mopane and Skukuza. Furthermore, abundance was higher at the undisturbed compared to disturbed plots and a contrary pattern was observed for species richness. Results showed a distinct variation in the assemblage of detritivores, nectarivores, omnivores and predators between EBPs and grazed plots, with a clear separation between Mopane and Skukuza. However, the composition of granivores and herbivores was neither influenced by fires nor grazing in the Mopane and Skukuza. The intensity of disturbances by fire and grazing failed to drive arthropod assemblages within different functional groups. We conclude that fire and grazing are potent drivers of assemblages of arthropod functional groups in Afrotropical savannas requiring evidence-based manipulation for the conservation of key species.
火灾和放牧对保护非洲热带稀树草原节肢动物功能多样性的影响
火灾和放牧破坏了热带稀树草原生物的多样性和组成及其功能。在本研究中,我们评估了火灾和放牧强度对克鲁格国家公园八个节肢动物功能群的数量、物种丰富度和组合的影响。我们在莫帕内和斯库库扎地区未受干扰、干扰较小或干扰严重的试验性烧毁地块(EBPs)和放牧地块采用陷阱和主动搜索的方法采集节肢动物。杂食性个体所占比例最高(40%),而食腐动物、食粒动物、食血动物、食草动物、食蜜动物、食肉动物和食腐动物则占 0.5% 至 31.4%。不同功能群的丰度、物种丰富度和组合在莫帕内和斯库库扎的 EBPs 和放牧地之间存在显著差异。与莫帕内和斯库扎的放牧地相比,EBP的节肢动物丰度和物种丰富度更高。此外,未受干扰地块的节肢动物丰度高于受干扰地块,物种丰富度则与之相反。结果表明,在EBPs和放牧地块之间,食腐动物、食蜜动物、杂食动物和食肉动物的组合存在明显差异,在Mopane和Skukuza之间差异明显。然而,在莫帕内和斯库库扎,食谷动物和食草动物的组成既不受火灾的影响,也不受放牧的影响。火灾和放牧造成的干扰强度未能影响不同功能群中节肢动物的组合。我们的结论是,火灾和放牧是非洲热带稀树草原节肢动物功能群集合的强大驱动力,需要在保护关键物种的过程中采取循证措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信