Institutional work after hype: The case of biogas in Germany

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Hyunjin Park , Philipp Grundmann
{"title":"Institutional work after hype: The case of biogas in Germany","authors":"Hyunjin Park ,&nbsp;Philipp Grundmann","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>How do niche actors navigate after “hype” is gone? A better understanding of the motivations and actions of technology advocates during a disillusionment phase can inform policymakers in dealing with technology and advocates facing negative expectations. Building on the conceptual notion of institutional work, we explain how biogas interest groups in Germany attempted to influence institutions when positive expectations about the technology were overwhelmed by negative ones. We shed light on their efforts to influence the Renewable Energy Act, which has provided state support for biogas generation for electricity supply, and their discursive justifications. Our analysis reveals that the interest groups predominantly drew on maintaining and creating work with the goal of protecting government support for biogas while accepting and introducing incremental changes towards enhanced economic and environmental sustainability. The narratives employed by the biogas actors addressed a broader range of stakeholders over time. Furthermore, we show that their institutional work practices were influenced by macro-level conditions, as well as by the resources and skills within the sector and actors. We identified instances of interaction between maintaining and creating work: creating work demonstrated the positive potential of technology, justified the continuation of support and helped adapt the support system to enhanced sustainability. Our work contributes to a nuanced understanding of agency in sociotechnical transitions by highlighting actors who do not engage in the typical activities of niche or incumbent actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103820"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do niche actors navigate after “hype” is gone? A better understanding of the motivations and actions of technology advocates during a disillusionment phase can inform policymakers in dealing with technology and advocates facing negative expectations. Building on the conceptual notion of institutional work, we explain how biogas interest groups in Germany attempted to influence institutions when positive expectations about the technology were overwhelmed by negative ones. We shed light on their efforts to influence the Renewable Energy Act, which has provided state support for biogas generation for electricity supply, and their discursive justifications. Our analysis reveals that the interest groups predominantly drew on maintaining and creating work with the goal of protecting government support for biogas while accepting and introducing incremental changes towards enhanced economic and environmental sustainability. The narratives employed by the biogas actors addressed a broader range of stakeholders over time. Furthermore, we show that their institutional work practices were influenced by macro-level conditions, as well as by the resources and skills within the sector and actors. We identified instances of interaction between maintaining and creating work: creating work demonstrated the positive potential of technology, justified the continuation of support and helped adapt the support system to enhanced sustainability. Our work contributes to a nuanced understanding of agency in sociotechnical transitions by highlighting actors who do not engage in the typical activities of niche or incumbent actors.
炒作之后的机构工作:德国沼气案例
在 "炒作 "效应消失后,利基参与者如何应对?更好地理解技术倡导者在幻想破灭阶段的动机和行动,可以为政策制定者在处理技术和倡导者面临负面期望时提供参考。基于 "机构工作 "这一概念,我们解释了德国的沼气利益集团如何在对该技术的积极期望被消极期望所淹没时试图影响机构。我们揭示了他们为影响《可再生能源法》(该法为沼气发电供电提供了国家支持)所做的努力及其话语理由。我们的分析表明,利益集团主要致力于维护和创造工作,目标是保护政府对沼气的支持,同时接受和引入渐进式变革,以提高经济和环境的可持续性。随着时间的推移,沼气参与者所使用的叙述方式涉及到了更广泛的利益相关者。此外,我们还表明,他们的机构工作实践受到宏观条件以及部门和参与者内部资源和技能的影响。我们发现了维持工作和创造工作之间的互动实例:创造工作展示了技术的积极潜力,证明了继续提供支持的合理性,并有助于调整支持系统以增强可持续性。我们的工作通过强调那些不从事利基或现有行动者典型活动的行动者,促进了对社会技术转型中的代理的细致理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信