Stumbling blocks for solar social enterprises: Unveiling the barriers facing enterprises serving the base of the pyramid solar market in Tanzania

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Gabriel C. Malima , Hezron Makundi , Gussai H. Sheikheldin
{"title":"Stumbling blocks for solar social enterprises: Unveiling the barriers facing enterprises serving the base of the pyramid solar market in Tanzania","authors":"Gabriel C. Malima ,&nbsp;Hezron Makundi ,&nbsp;Gussai H. Sheikheldin","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the initially favourable environment for solar PV investments, the relevant literature increasingly emphasizes the emerging barriers that threaten the growth and sustainability of solar PV enterprises. This has led scholars to examine challenges in East Africa's solar energy subsector, with a focus on the evolving institutional environment. However, we discovered that, within the ongoing discourse surrounding this sector, relatively limited scholarly attention has been given to solar energy service social enterprises (SEs). In response to this gap, we have conducted a specific study to explore the barriers facing the performance of solar energy service SEs in Tanzania. Drawing on institutional theory, we unveil the formative, normative and cognitive factors that influence the performance of SEs. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with ten solar SEs in Tanzania, supplemented by a review of the literature. The study revealed that regulatory barriers such as an unfavourable policy environment, grid arrival regulations, uncertainties over tariff policies, the prevalence of counterfeit products and limited access to finance and capital, as well as normative constraints such as limited partnerships and networking, are key barriers to operating at the base of the pyramid (BoP). The study underscores the need for collaborative efforts between the government, investors and SEs to create an enabling environment to continue serving the BoP market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103847"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624004389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the initially favourable environment for solar PV investments, the relevant literature increasingly emphasizes the emerging barriers that threaten the growth and sustainability of solar PV enterprises. This has led scholars to examine challenges in East Africa's solar energy subsector, with a focus on the evolving institutional environment. However, we discovered that, within the ongoing discourse surrounding this sector, relatively limited scholarly attention has been given to solar energy service social enterprises (SEs). In response to this gap, we have conducted a specific study to explore the barriers facing the performance of solar energy service SEs in Tanzania. Drawing on institutional theory, we unveil the formative, normative and cognitive factors that influence the performance of SEs. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with ten solar SEs in Tanzania, supplemented by a review of the literature. The study revealed that regulatory barriers such as an unfavourable policy environment, grid arrival regulations, uncertainties over tariff policies, the prevalence of counterfeit products and limited access to finance and capital, as well as normative constraints such as limited partnerships and networking, are key barriers to operating at the base of the pyramid (BoP). The study underscores the need for collaborative efforts between the government, investors and SEs to create an enabling environment to continue serving the BoP market.
太阳能社会企业的绊脚石:揭示坦桑尼亚金字塔底层太阳能市场企业面临的障碍
尽管最初太阳能光伏发电投资环境良好,但相关文献越来越多地强调新出现的障碍威胁着太阳能光伏发电企业的增长和可持续性。这促使学者们开始研究东非太阳能子行业面临的挑战,重点关注不断变化的制度环境。然而,我们发现,在围绕该行业的持续讨论中,学者们对太阳能服务社会企业(SEs)的关注相对有限。针对这一空白,我们开展了一项专门研究,以探讨坦桑尼亚太阳能服务社会企业的绩效所面临的障碍。借鉴制度理论,我们揭示了影响社会企业绩效的形成、规范和认知因素。数据是通过对坦桑尼亚 10 家太阳能企业进行半结构化访谈收集的,并辅以文献综述。研究显示,不利的政策环境、电网接入规定、关税政策的不确定性、假冒产品盛行、获得资金和资本的途径有限等监管障碍,以及有限的伙伴关系和网络等规范性制约因素,是在金字塔底层(BoP)运营的主要障碍。这项研究强调,政府、投资者和社会企业需要共同努力,创造有利环境,继续为金字塔底层市场服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信