{"title":"The effect of alimony on married women's labor supply and fertility: Evidence from state-level reforms","authors":"Daniel Fernández-Kranz, Jennifer Roff","doi":"10.1002/pam.22661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reforms that reduce spousal support after divorce are generally thought to reduce the bargaining power of alimony recipients as well as their incentives to participate in the traditional model of household specialization. Using the U.S. Time Use Survey and exploiting a series of recent reforms in several U.S. states that reduced the rights of eligible spouses, we find that wives surprised by the reforms reacted by increasing their labor supply, but the adjustment mechanism varied by educational group. While college educated wives' labor supply increased at the expense of time spent on housework and childcare, wives with less than a college degree sacrificed personal care and leisure time. Effects for men are generally smaller and not statistically significant. We also find a reduction in the rate of new births following the reforms, with the effect being much more pronounced in the case of women with a university education, suggesting that part of the difference in time use may be attributable to differences in preferences and the cost of children by educational levels. Since children are a marital public good, our results imply a decrease in marriage-specific investment. The estimated effects are robust to various sensitivity tests and are greater in couples with a high-income differential and therefore more exposed to changes in alimony laws.","PeriodicalId":48105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Analysis and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reforms that reduce spousal support after divorce are generally thought to reduce the bargaining power of alimony recipients as well as their incentives to participate in the traditional model of household specialization. Using the U.S. Time Use Survey and exploiting a series of recent reforms in several U.S. states that reduced the rights of eligible spouses, we find that wives surprised by the reforms reacted by increasing their labor supply, but the adjustment mechanism varied by educational group. While college educated wives' labor supply increased at the expense of time spent on housework and childcare, wives with less than a college degree sacrificed personal care and leisure time. Effects for men are generally smaller and not statistically significant. We also find a reduction in the rate of new births following the reforms, with the effect being much more pronounced in the case of women with a university education, suggesting that part of the difference in time use may be attributable to differences in preferences and the cost of children by educational levels. Since children are a marital public good, our results imply a decrease in marriage-specific investment. The estimated effects are robust to various sensitivity tests and are greater in couples with a high-income differential and therefore more exposed to changes in alimony laws.
人们普遍认为,减少离婚后配偶赡养费的改革会降低赡养费领取者的讨价还价能力以及她们参与传统家庭专业化模式的积极性。我们利用美国时间利用调查(U.S. Time Use Survey),并利用美国几个州最近进行的一系列改革(这些改革降低了符合条件的配偶的权利),发现对改革感到惊讶的妻子们的反应是增加她们的劳动力供给,但调整机制因教育群体而异。受过大学教育的妻子在增加劳动供给的同时牺牲了家务和育儿时间,而大学以下学历的妻子则牺牲了个人护理和休闲时间。对男性的影响一般较小,在统计上也不显著。我们还发现,改革后新生儿的出生率有所下降,这对受过大学教育的女性的影响更为明显,这表明时间使用上的部分差异可能归因于不同教育水平的偏好和子女成本的差异。由于子女是一种婚姻公共产品,我们的结果意味着婚姻特定投资的减少。估计的影响对各种敏感性测试都是稳健的,而且对高收入差异的夫妇影响更大,因此更容易受到赡养费法律变化的影响。
期刊介绍:
This journal encompasses issues and practices in policy analysis and public management. Listed among the contributors are economists, public managers, and operations researchers. Featured regularly are book reviews and a department devoted to discussing ideas and issues of importance to practitioners, researchers, and academics.