Production of carbon nanotubes from captured carbon: An ex-ante life cycle assessment case study

IF 13.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Justin Z. Lian, Varsha Balapa, Earl Goetheer, Stefano Cucurachi
{"title":"Production of carbon nanotubes from captured carbon: An ex-ante life cycle assessment case study","authors":"Justin Z. Lian, Varsha Balapa, Earl Goetheer, Stefano Cucurachi","doi":"10.1016/j.cej.2024.158007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) plays a key role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and reaching carbon neutrality goals. This study assesses the environmental impacts of producing carbon nanotubes (CNTs) via molten salt CO<sub>2</sub> capture and electrochemical transformation (MSCC-ET) and Catalytic Chemical Vapor Deposition (CCVD), both using CO<sub>2</sub> as feedstock. We screened and selected technologies using a parameter-based method and conducted process modeling and an ex-ante Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to move beyond lab-scale evaluations and included the purification steps. The MSCC-ET approach showed advantages in reducing impacts related to climate change, energy, and ozone depletion impacts, specifically suggesting lower CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. However, traditional CCVD outperformed MSCC-ET in several other impact categories. Key contributors to the environmental impacts of MSCC-ET were found in high material use in electrolysis, purification, and electricity consumption, modeled using the Belgium grid. Moreover, including the carbon capture unit in the assessment could provide a complete view of the environmental impacts regarding CCU. For every 100 tons of MWCNTs produced, a monoethanolamine (MEA)-based carbon capture unit integrated into the MSCC-ET system could roughly reduce 716.5 tons CO<sub>2</sub>-eq. Additionally, electricity consumption was found to constitute a significant portion of the environmental impacts. Therefore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted, revealing that changes in the electricity source, catalyst used, and CO<sub>2</sub> source significantly influenced the environmental performance of both technologies. Furthermore, we summarize practical insights from this study to guide the effective application of ex-ante LCA for carbon nanomaterials. The paper concludes with actionable recommendations for early-stage technology developers on optimizing energy use, improving material efficiency, and integrating recycling to enhance sustainability. In addition, we provide recommendations for LCA practitioners on incorporating dynamic systems to transition from lab-scale to industrial contexts, thereby bridging the gap between research and practical implementation.","PeriodicalId":270,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.158007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) plays a key role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and reaching carbon neutrality goals. This study assesses the environmental impacts of producing carbon nanotubes (CNTs) via molten salt CO2 capture and electrochemical transformation (MSCC-ET) and Catalytic Chemical Vapor Deposition (CCVD), both using CO2 as feedstock. We screened and selected technologies using a parameter-based method and conducted process modeling and an ex-ante Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to move beyond lab-scale evaluations and included the purification steps. The MSCC-ET approach showed advantages in reducing impacts related to climate change, energy, and ozone depletion impacts, specifically suggesting lower CO2 emissions. However, traditional CCVD outperformed MSCC-ET in several other impact categories. Key contributors to the environmental impacts of MSCC-ET were found in high material use in electrolysis, purification, and electricity consumption, modeled using the Belgium grid. Moreover, including the carbon capture unit in the assessment could provide a complete view of the environmental impacts regarding CCU. For every 100 tons of MWCNTs produced, a monoethanolamine (MEA)-based carbon capture unit integrated into the MSCC-ET system could roughly reduce 716.5 tons CO2-eq. Additionally, electricity consumption was found to constitute a significant portion of the environmental impacts. Therefore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted, revealing that changes in the electricity source, catalyst used, and CO2 source significantly influenced the environmental performance of both technologies. Furthermore, we summarize practical insights from this study to guide the effective application of ex-ante LCA for carbon nanomaterials. The paper concludes with actionable recommendations for early-stage technology developers on optimizing energy use, improving material efficiency, and integrating recycling to enhance sustainability. In addition, we provide recommendations for LCA practitioners on incorporating dynamic systems to transition from lab-scale to industrial contexts, thereby bridging the gap between research and practical implementation.

Abstract Image

利用捕获的碳生产纳米碳管:事前生命周期评估案例研究
碳捕集与利用(CCU)在减少温室气体排放和实现碳中和目标方面发挥着关键作用。本研究评估了以二氧化碳为原料,通过熔盐二氧化碳捕集与电化学转化(MSCC-ET)和催化化学气相沉积(CCVD)生产碳纳米管(CNT)对环境的影响。我们采用基于参数的方法筛选技术,并进行了工艺建模和事前生命周期评估(LCA),以超越实验室规模的评估,并将提纯步骤包括在内。MSCC-ET 方法在减少与气候变化、能源和臭氧消耗相关的影响方面表现出优势,特别是二氧化碳排放量较低。不过,传统的 CCVD 在其他几类影响方面的表现要优于 MSCC-ET。MSCC-ET 对环境的影响主要体现在电解、净化和电力消耗过程中材料的大量使用(以比利时电网为模型)。此外,将碳捕获装置纳入评估可提供有关 CCU 环境影响的完整视图。每生产 100 吨 MWCNTs,集成到 MSCC-ET 系统中的基于单乙醇胺 (MEA) 的碳捕集装置可减少大约 716.5 吨二氧化碳当量。此外,还发现电力消耗在环境影响中占很大比重。因此,我们进行了一项敏感性分析,结果显示,电力来源、所用催化剂和二氧化碳来源的变化会对这两种技术的环境绩效产生重大影响。此外,我们还总结了本研究的实用见解,以指导碳纳米材料事前生命周期评估的有效应用。本文最后为早期技术开发人员提供了优化能源使用、提高材料效率和整合回收利用以增强可持续性的可行建议。此外,我们还为生命周期评估从业人员提供了有关纳入动态系统的建议,以便从实验室规模过渡到工业规模,从而缩小研究与实际实施之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Engineering Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
6781
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Chemical Engineering Journal is an international research journal that invites contributions of original and novel fundamental research. It aims to provide an international platform for presenting original fundamental research, interpretative reviews, and discussions on new developments in chemical engineering. The journal welcomes papers that describe novel theory and its practical application, as well as those that demonstrate the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. It also welcomes reports on carefully conducted experimental work that is soundly interpreted. The main focus of the journal is on original and rigorous research results that have broad significance. The Catalysis section within the Chemical Engineering Journal focuses specifically on Experimental and Theoretical studies in the fields of heterogeneous catalysis, molecular catalysis, and biocatalysis. These studies have industrial impact on various sectors such as chemicals, energy, materials, foods, healthcare, and environmental protection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信