The case for schismogenesis between Late Developmental Northern Rio Grande and Chacoan communities in Northern New Mexico

IF 2 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Zachary J. Cooper , Jeffrey R. Ferguson , David V. Hill
{"title":"The case for schismogenesis between Late Developmental Northern Rio Grande and Chacoan communities in Northern New Mexico","authors":"Zachary J. Cooper ,&nbsp;Jeffrey R. Ferguson ,&nbsp;David V. Hill","doi":"10.1016/j.jaa.2024.101635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Archaeologists have traditionally conceptualized culture areas and associated ethnic group boundaries as reflecting significant degrees of dissimilarity between “core” and “peripheral” cultural types. This dissimilarity is typically thought to correlate with gradual geographic isolation. However, an alternative model has been presented that underscores the importance of inter-group interaction to ethnic group formation through a process known as “schismogenesis”, or progressive differentiation. According to this model, societies define themselves through an absence of borrowing rather than through an absence of interaction. Here, we make a case for schismogenesis between Late Developmental Northern Rio Grande and Chacoan communities.</div><div>First, we compare architectural patterns between these communities. Then, we present the results of our neutron activation analysis and ceramic petrography from the Northern Rio Grande site of LA 835. Based on this evidence, we argue that the lack of quintessential Chacoan material traits among Late Developmental Northern Rio Grande communities is not due to isolation, but instead due to schismogenesis reflective of Northern Rio Grande resistance to the Chaco World. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results for how archaeologists currently define participation in the Chaco regional system as well as for models of ethnic group formation more broadly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 101635"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278416524000667","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Archaeologists have traditionally conceptualized culture areas and associated ethnic group boundaries as reflecting significant degrees of dissimilarity between “core” and “peripheral” cultural types. This dissimilarity is typically thought to correlate with gradual geographic isolation. However, an alternative model has been presented that underscores the importance of inter-group interaction to ethnic group formation through a process known as “schismogenesis”, or progressive differentiation. According to this model, societies define themselves through an absence of borrowing rather than through an absence of interaction. Here, we make a case for schismogenesis between Late Developmental Northern Rio Grande and Chacoan communities.
First, we compare architectural patterns between these communities. Then, we present the results of our neutron activation analysis and ceramic petrography from the Northern Rio Grande site of LA 835. Based on this evidence, we argue that the lack of quintessential Chacoan material traits among Late Developmental Northern Rio Grande communities is not due to isolation, but instead due to schismogenesis reflective of Northern Rio Grande resistance to the Chaco World. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results for how archaeologists currently define participation in the Chaco regional system as well as for models of ethnic group formation more broadly.
新墨西哥州北部北格兰德河发展晚期与查科人族群之间的分裂形成案例
考古学家历来认为,文化区域和相关族群边界反映了 "核心 "和 "外围 "文化类型之间的显著差异。这种差异通常被认为与逐渐的地理隔离有关。不过,也有人提出了另一种模式,强调群体间的互动对族群形成的重要性,这一过程被称为 "分裂生成 "或渐进分化。根据这一模式,社会是通过缺乏借鉴而不是缺乏互动来界定自身的。在此,我们提出了北里奥格兰德发展晚期与查科人社区之间的分裂发生的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: An innovative, international publication, the Journal of Anthropological Archaeology is devoted to the development of theory and, in a broad sense, methodology for the systematic and rigorous understanding of the organization, operation, and evolution of human societies. The discipline served by the journal is characterized by its goals and approach, not by geographical or temporal bounds. The data utilized or treated range from the earliest archaeological evidence for the emergence of human culture to historically documented societies and the contemporary observations of the ethnographer, ethnoarchaeologist, sociologist, or geographer. These subjects appear in the journal as examples of cultural organization, operation, and evolution, not as specific historical phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信