Liposomal bupivacaine for sleeve gastrectomy is associated with improved opioid outcomes and lower odds of opioid use disorder: claims-based analysis.

Jon Gould, Andras Sandor, Jennifer H Lin, Swapnabir Kakoty, Mary DiGiorgi, Karl A LeBlanc
{"title":"Liposomal bupivacaine for sleeve gastrectomy is associated with improved opioid outcomes and lower odds of opioid use disorder: claims-based analysis.","authors":"Jon Gould, Andras Sandor, Jennifer H Lin, Swapnabir Kakoty, Mary DiGiorgi, Karl A LeBlanc","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2024.10.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing bariatric surgery may be at increased risk for postsurgical opioid dependence, highlighting a need for opioid-sparing anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a prolonged release formulation of bupivacaine, may improve postoperative pain management and reduce postsurgical opioid use. This retrospective claims-database study investigated the effects of LB versus non-LB analgesia on opioid use and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients receiving laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Retrospective study using the IQVIA linkage claims database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients aged ≥18 years and free of opioid prescriptions within the prior 6 months undergoing inpatient laparoscopic SG between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, were analyzed. Outcomes included perioperative opioid use in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs), postdischarge HCRU, continued (>2 weeks to 3 months postdischarge) and persistent (4-6 months postdischarge) opioid use, and opioid use disorder (OUD) at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4298 patients (2149 in each cohort), LB was associated with significantly fewer perioperative opioids (100.53 versus 155.48 MMEs; mean difference, -54.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), -64.46, -45.45]; P < .0001), lower rates of in-hospital ORAEs (9.63% versus 13.82%; odds ratio [OR], .67 [95% CI, .55, .80]; P < .0001), significantly lower incidence of OUD (.09% versus .51%; OR, .18 [95% CI, .04, .82]; P = .026), shorter hospital length of stay (P = .0008), and significantly lower odds of 30-day postdischarge hospital readmissions (P = .025) versus non-LB analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LB reduced opioid use, in-hospital ORAEs, OUD, and hospital readmissions after laparoscopic SG.</p>","PeriodicalId":94216,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.10.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing bariatric surgery may be at increased risk for postsurgical opioid dependence, highlighting a need for opioid-sparing anesthesia.

Objectives: Liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a prolonged release formulation of bupivacaine, may improve postoperative pain management and reduce postsurgical opioid use. This retrospective claims-database study investigated the effects of LB versus non-LB analgesia on opioid use and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in patients receiving laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

Setting: Retrospective study using the IQVIA linkage claims database.

Methods: Data from patients aged ≥18 years and free of opioid prescriptions within the prior 6 months undergoing inpatient laparoscopic SG between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, were analyzed. Outcomes included perioperative opioid use in oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), opioid-related adverse events (ORAEs), postdischarge HCRU, continued (>2 weeks to 3 months postdischarge) and persistent (4-6 months postdischarge) opioid use, and opioid use disorder (OUD) at 6 months.

Results: Of 4298 patients (2149 in each cohort), LB was associated with significantly fewer perioperative opioids (100.53 versus 155.48 MMEs; mean difference, -54.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), -64.46, -45.45]; P < .0001), lower rates of in-hospital ORAEs (9.63% versus 13.82%; odds ratio [OR], .67 [95% CI, .55, .80]; P < .0001), significantly lower incidence of OUD (.09% versus .51%; OR, .18 [95% CI, .04, .82]; P = .026), shorter hospital length of stay (P = .0008), and significantly lower odds of 30-day postdischarge hospital readmissions (P = .025) versus non-LB analgesia.

Conclusions: LB reduced opioid use, in-hospital ORAEs, OUD, and hospital readmissions after laparoscopic SG.

用于袖状胃切除术的脂质体布比卡因与阿片类药物治疗效果的改善和阿片类药物使用障碍几率的降低有关:基于索赔的分析。
背景:接受减肥手术的患者术后对阿片类药物产生依赖的风险可能会增加:接受减肥手术的患者术后对阿片类药物产生依赖的风险可能会增加,这凸显了对阿片类药物稀释麻醉的需求:脂质体布比卡因(LB)是布比卡因的一种长效释放制剂,可改善术后疼痛管理并减少术后阿片类药物的使用。这项索赔数据库回顾性研究调查了在接受腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(SG)的患者中,LB镇痛与非LB镇痛对阿片类药物使用和医疗资源利用(HCRU)的影响:使用 IQVIA 链接索赔数据库进行回顾性研究:分析了2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间接受住院腹腔镜SG手术的年龄≥18岁且前6个月内无阿片类药物处方的患者数据。结果包括以口服吗啡毫克当量(MMEs)计算的围手术期阿片类药物使用量、阿片类药物相关不良事件(ORAEs)、出院后HCRU、持续(出院后>2周至3个月)和持续(出院后4-6个月)使用阿片类药物,以及6个月时的阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD):在 4298 名患者中(每个队列中有 2149 人),LB 与围手术期阿片类药物使用量显著减少(100.53 对 155.48 MMEs;平均差异,-54.95 [95% 置信区间 (CI),-64.46, -45.45];P < .0001)、院内 ORAEs 发生率较低(9.63% 对 13.82%;几率比 [OR], .67 [95% CI, .55, .80]; P < .0001),OUD 发生率显著降低(.09% 对 .51%;OR, .18 [95% CI, .04, .82]; P = .026),住院时间缩短(P = .0008),出院后 30 天再入院的几率显著降低(P = .025):结论:LB 可减少腹腔镜 SG 术后阿片类药物的使用、院内 ORAEs、OUD 和再入院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信