Lower extremity muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training in older adults: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials

IF 3.9
Davi Alves de Santana , Pedro Godoi Scolfaro , Emanuele Marzetti , Cláudia Regina Cavaglieri
{"title":"Lower extremity muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training in older adults: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Davi Alves de Santana ,&nbsp;Pedro Godoi Scolfaro ,&nbsp;Emanuele Marzetti ,&nbsp;Cláudia Regina Cavaglieri","doi":"10.1016/j.exger.2024.112639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the effects of resistance training (RT) on knee extensor muscle hypertrophy in adults 65 years and older.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to review randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of supervised RT on 1) muscle size, 2) fiber area, and 3) leg lean mass (LLM). Random-effects meta-analyses of standardized mean difference (SMD) and raw mean difference (RMD) for LLM were calculated. We performed a meta-regression to examine the interference of age, training volume, and duration on the results related to hypertrophy at muscle and fiber levels.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-two studies were included in the review, and 28 were meta-analyzed. The meta-analysis found a significant effect of RT on muscle size (SMD = 0.34; 95 % CI: 0.16–0.52; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and fiber area (SMD = 0.54; 95 % CI: 0.24–0.84; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), but not on LLM (RMD = 0.22; 95 % CI: −0.22-0.66 <em>p</em> = 0.321<em>). A</em> subanalysis of studies that assessed quadriceps femoris size (excluding isolated quadriceps femoris muscles from the analysis) also revealed a significant effect of RT (95 % CI: 0.20–0.69; <em>p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>. Regression analysis indicated a significant influence of intervention duration on type II fiber area (<em>p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.034),</em> while no significant influence was detected for weekly sets or age for any outcome measure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RT promotes muscle hypertrophy in older adults at both whole-muscle and fiber levels, with training duration potentially influencing the response. Measures of leg lean mass may not capture RT-induced adaptation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94003,"journal":{"name":"Experimental gerontology","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 112639"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0531556524002857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the effects of resistance training (RT) on knee extensor muscle hypertrophy in adults 65 years and older.

Methods

A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to review randomized controlled trials that assessed the effects of supervised RT on 1) muscle size, 2) fiber area, and 3) leg lean mass (LLM). Random-effects meta-analyses of standardized mean difference (SMD) and raw mean difference (RMD) for LLM were calculated. We performed a meta-regression to examine the interference of age, training volume, and duration on the results related to hypertrophy at muscle and fiber levels.

Results

Thirty-two studies were included in the review, and 28 were meta-analyzed. The meta-analysis found a significant effect of RT on muscle size (SMD = 0.34; 95 % CI: 0.16–0.52; p < 0.001) and fiber area (SMD = 0.54; 95 % CI: 0.24–0.84; p < 0.001), but not on LLM (RMD = 0.22; 95 % CI: −0.22-0.66 p = 0.321). A subanalysis of studies that assessed quadriceps femoris size (excluding isolated quadriceps femoris muscles from the analysis) also revealed a significant effect of RT (95 % CI: 0.20–0.69; p < 0.001). Regression analysis indicated a significant influence of intervention duration on type II fiber area (p = 0.034), while no significant influence was detected for weekly sets or age for any outcome measure.

Conclusions

RT promotes muscle hypertrophy in older adults at both whole-muscle and fiber levels, with training duration potentially influencing the response. Measures of leg lean mass may not capture RT-induced adaptation.
老年人下肢肌肉肥大对阻力训练的反应:随机对照试验的系统回顾、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
研究目的本研究旨在调查阻力训练(RT)对 65 岁及以上成年人膝关节伸肌肥大的影响:在 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 中进行了系统性检索,回顾了评估有指导的 RT 对以下方面影响的随机对照试验:1)肌肉大小;2)纤维面积;3)腿部瘦体重(LLM)。我们计算了LLM的标准化均值差异(SMD)和原始均值差异(RMD)的随机效应元分析。我们进行了元回归,以研究年龄、训练量和持续时间对肌肉和纤维水平肥大相关结果的干扰:共有 32 项研究被纳入综述,其中 28 项进行了元分析。荟萃分析发现,RT 对肌肉尺寸有显著影响(SMD = 0.34;95 % CI:0.16-0.52;P 结论:RT 可促进老年人肌肉肥大:RT在整个肌肉和纤维水平上促进老年人肌肉肥大,训练持续时间可能会影响反应。对腿部瘦体重的测量可能无法捕捉到 RT 诱导的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental gerontology
Experimental gerontology Ageing, Biochemistry, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信