Si-Huai Xiong, Yuan-Chen Wang, Ji-Yao Guo, Lei Wang, Tian-Yu Shi, Liang-Hao Hu, Zhuan Liao, Wen-Bin Zou
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy and safety of basket catheters and balloon catheters for endoscopic pancreatic duct stone clearance.","authors":"Si-Huai Xiong, Yuan-Chen Wang, Ji-Yao Guo, Lei Wang, Tian-Yu Shi, Liang-Hao Hu, Zhuan Liao, Wen-Bin Zou","doi":"10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The choice of a basket or a balloon catheter during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the clearance of pancreatic duct stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) remains controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of these two devices for pancreatic duct stone extractions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the efficacy and safety of basket and balloon catheters for pancreatic stone extractions. We enrolled CP patients who underwent ERCP for the first time at Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University between February 2012 and December 2021. After propensity score matching (1:1), 101 patients were included in each group. The primary outcome was the rate of pancreatic stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included the rate of adverse events during hospitalization, long-term pain relief, and quality of life after one year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of complete clearance was comparable between the two groups (86.1 % vs. 84.2 %, P = 0.692). In patients with stones ≥ 2 cm before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), the rate of complete clearance was significantly higher in the balloon catheter group when compared to the basket catheter group [100 % (19/19) vs. 70.0 % (14/20), P = 0.031]. In the multivariate analysis, ESWL prior to stone extraction was the only independent predictor of complete clearance [with ESWL 58.4 % (264/452) vs. without ESWL 41.6 % (188/452), odds ratio = 2.3, 95 % confidence interval: 1.2-4.3; P = 0.013]. No significant differences between groups were found regarding the rates of adverse events during hospitalization, quality of life, and pain relief after one year of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Basket and balloon catheters showed similar efficacy and safety for pancreatic stone extractions. However, the balloon catheter was superior to the basket catheter if the pancreatic stone size was ≥ 2 cm before ESWL.</p>","PeriodicalId":55059,"journal":{"name":"Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.11.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The choice of a basket or a balloon catheter during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the clearance of pancreatic duct stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) remains controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of these two devices for pancreatic duct stone extractions.
Methods: We compared the efficacy and safety of basket and balloon catheters for pancreatic stone extractions. We enrolled CP patients who underwent ERCP for the first time at Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University between February 2012 and December 2021. After propensity score matching (1:1), 101 patients were included in each group. The primary outcome was the rate of pancreatic stone clearance. Secondary outcomes included the rate of adverse events during hospitalization, long-term pain relief, and quality of life after one year follow-up period.
Results: The rate of complete clearance was comparable between the two groups (86.1 % vs. 84.2 %, P = 0.692). In patients with stones ≥ 2 cm before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), the rate of complete clearance was significantly higher in the balloon catheter group when compared to the basket catheter group [100 % (19/19) vs. 70.0 % (14/20), P = 0.031]. In the multivariate analysis, ESWL prior to stone extraction was the only independent predictor of complete clearance [with ESWL 58.4 % (264/452) vs. without ESWL 41.6 % (188/452), odds ratio = 2.3, 95 % confidence interval: 1.2-4.3; P = 0.013]. No significant differences between groups were found regarding the rates of adverse events during hospitalization, quality of life, and pain relief after one year of follow-up.
Conclusions: Basket and balloon catheters showed similar efficacy and safety for pancreatic stone extractions. However, the balloon catheter was superior to the basket catheter if the pancreatic stone size was ≥ 2 cm before ESWL.
期刊介绍：
Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International (HBPD INT) (ISSN 1499-3872 / CN 33-1391/R) a bimonthly journal published by First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China. It publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases. Papers cover the medical, surgical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas under the headings Liver, Biliary, Pancreas, Transplantation, Research, Special Reports, Editorials, Review Articles, Brief Communications, Clinical Summary, Clinical Images and Case Reports. It also deals with the basic sciences and experimental work. The journal is abstracted and indexed in SCI-E, IM/MEDLINE, EMBASE/EM, CA, Scopus, ScienceDirect, etc.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
