Comparative perioperative outcomes of intravenous indocyanine green during robot-assisted cystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Gen Fan, Yinyu Wu, Junji Wang, Yu Wang, Yushui Chen, Ke Hu, Tielong Tang
{"title":"Comparative perioperative outcomes of intravenous indocyanine green during robot-assisted cystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Gen Fan, Yinyu Wu, Junji Wang, Yu Wang, Yushui Chen, Ke Hu, Tielong Tang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02171-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of intravenous indocyanine green (ICG) in the context of robot-assisted cystectomy (RAC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. The primary focus was to compare postoperative complications and perioperative outcomes between the ICG cohort and the non-ICG cohort. The primary outcome indicators were the incidence of ureteroenteric strictures and the number of strictures anastomoses. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, to identify pertinent studies that evaluate the application of ICG in RAC. The analysis of dichotomous variables was performed using relative risk (RR), while weighted mean difference (WMD) was utilized for comprehensive assessment of continuous variables. A total of 4 studies encompassing 732 patients were included in the analysis, comprising 311 patients who received ICG and 421 patients who did not. The baseline characteristics were found to be comparable between the two cohorts. The meta-analysis indicated that the occurrence of 90-day severe complications was markedly lower in the ICG cohort versus the non-ICG cohort (RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90, P = 0.011). In addition, the length of ureteral resection was longer in the ICG cohort compared to the non-ICG cohort (WMD = 0.25, 95% CI 0.01-0.49, P = 0.039), with notably significant results for right-side procedures (WMD = 0.54, 95% CI 0.28-0.80, P < 0.001). Nevertheless, no substantial differences observed between the two cohorts regarding the occurrence of ureteroenteric stricture, numbers of strictures at anastomoses, operative time (OT), length of hospitalization (LOS), or lymph node positivity. Compared with the non-ICG cohort, the ICG cohort had comparable efficacy and was able to reduce the incidence of 90-day severe complications. The use of intravenous ICG showed promising clinical applicability during RAC; however, additional long-term studies are necessary to substantiate its effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02171-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of intravenous indocyanine green (ICG) in the context of robot-assisted cystectomy (RAC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. The primary focus was to compare postoperative complications and perioperative outcomes between the ICG cohort and the non-ICG cohort. The primary outcome indicators were the incidence of ureteroenteric strictures and the number of strictures anastomoses. A comprehensive search was performed across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, to identify pertinent studies that evaluate the application of ICG in RAC. The analysis of dichotomous variables was performed using relative risk (RR), while weighted mean difference (WMD) was utilized for comprehensive assessment of continuous variables. A total of 4 studies encompassing 732 patients were included in the analysis, comprising 311 patients who received ICG and 421 patients who did not. The baseline characteristics were found to be comparable between the two cohorts. The meta-analysis indicated that the occurrence of 90-day severe complications was markedly lower in the ICG cohort versus the non-ICG cohort (RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.90, P = 0.011). In addition, the length of ureteral resection was longer in the ICG cohort compared to the non-ICG cohort (WMD = 0.25, 95% CI 0.01-0.49, P = 0.039), with notably significant results for right-side procedures (WMD = 0.54, 95% CI 0.28-0.80, P < 0.001). Nevertheless, no substantial differences observed between the two cohorts regarding the occurrence of ureteroenteric stricture, numbers of strictures at anastomoses, operative time (OT), length of hospitalization (LOS), or lymph node positivity. Compared with the non-ICG cohort, the ICG cohort had comparable efficacy and was able to reduce the incidence of 90-day severe complications. The use of intravenous ICG showed promising clinical applicability during RAC; however, additional long-term studies are necessary to substantiate its effectiveness.

机器人辅助膀胱切除术中静脉注射吲哚菁绿的围手术期疗效比较:一项荟萃分析和系统综述。
本研究旨在通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估在机器人辅助膀胱切除术(RAC)中静脉注射吲哚菁绿(ICG)的临床效用。研究的主要重点是比较 ICG 组群和非 ICG 组群的术后并发症和围手术期结果。主要结果指标是输尿管肠管狭窄的发生率和狭窄吻合的数量。我们在多个数据库(包括 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science)中进行了全面检索,以确定评估 ICG 在 RAC 中应用的相关研究。二分变量的分析采用相对风险(RR),连续变量的综合评估则采用加权平均差(WMD)。共有 4 项研究的 732 名患者参与了分析,其中 311 名患者接受了 ICG 治疗,421 名患者未接受 ICG 治疗。结果发现,两组患者的基线特征具有可比性。荟萃分析表明,ICG 组群与非 ICG 组群相比,90 天严重并发症的发生率明显降低(RR = 0.63,95% CI 0.44-0.90,P = 0.011)。此外,与非ICG队列相比,ICG队列的输尿管切除长度更长(WMD = 0.25,95% CI 0.01-0.49,P = 0.039),右侧手术的结果尤其显著(WMD = 0.54,95% CI 0.28-0.80,P = 0.039)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信