Potential impacts to human health from climate change: A comparative life-cycle assessment of single-use versus reusable devices flexible ureteroscopes.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Marlene Thöne, Jan Lask, Jörg Hennenlotter, Matthias Saar, Igor Tsaur, Arnulf Stenzl, Steffen Rausch
{"title":"Potential impacts to human health from climate change: A comparative life-cycle assessment of single-use versus reusable devices flexible ureteroscopes.","authors":"Marlene Thöne, Jan Lask, Jörg Hennenlotter, Matthias Saar, Igor Tsaur, Arnulf Stenzl, Steffen Rausch","doi":"10.1007/s00240-024-01664-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Climate change poses a significant global health challenge, with medical procedures contributing substantially to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Urology, as part of the broader healthcare sector, has begun integrating Planetary Health concepts to address this issue. While earlier studies have focused on Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) of urological procedures, these evaluations remain data-dependent, and insights into intra-hospital emissions are limited. This study introduces a methodical approach for analyzing intra-institutional processes of LCA for single-use and reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS). The LCA method was applied to assess the greenhouse gas emissions (CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents, CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) generated across the life cycle of fURS, including production, use-phase, reprocessing, maintenance, and disposal. The study approximated the Global Warming Potential (GWP) per one-hour use and evaluated associated health impacts using the ReCiPe2016(H) method, which measures Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). Results showed that for reusable fURS, assuming 133 usages per device and maintenance after every 11th use, each application generated 1.24 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, equivalent to 1.15E-06 DALYs. In contrast, single-use fURS generated 4.93 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq and 4.57E-06 DALYs per application. The production and reprocessing stages were identified as having the greatest environmental and health impacts. For reusable fURS, electricity required during refurbishment and use phases was a key contributor, whereas the production phase accounted for most of the impact in single-use devices. Overall, singleuse fURS had a substantially higher potential environmental and health impact than their reusable counterparts. This study underscores the environmental and health impacts of ureterorenoscopy and highlights the importance of incorporating Planetary Health principles into healthcare practices. It provides a foundation for further analyses and research, aiming to drive transformative action in the healthcare sector toward sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"52 1","pages":"166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01664-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change poses a significant global health challenge, with medical procedures contributing substantially to CO2 emissions. Urology, as part of the broader healthcare sector, has begun integrating Planetary Health concepts to address this issue. While earlier studies have focused on Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) of urological procedures, these evaluations remain data-dependent, and insights into intra-hospital emissions are limited. This study introduces a methodical approach for analyzing intra-institutional processes of LCA for single-use and reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS). The LCA method was applied to assess the greenhouse gas emissions (CO2 equivalents, CO2-eq) generated across the life cycle of fURS, including production, use-phase, reprocessing, maintenance, and disposal. The study approximated the Global Warming Potential (GWP) per one-hour use and evaluated associated health impacts using the ReCiPe2016(H) method, which measures Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). Results showed that for reusable fURS, assuming 133 usages per device and maintenance after every 11th use, each application generated 1.24 kg CO2-eq, equivalent to 1.15E-06 DALYs. In contrast, single-use fURS generated 4.93 kg CO2-eq and 4.57E-06 DALYs per application. The production and reprocessing stages were identified as having the greatest environmental and health impacts. For reusable fURS, electricity required during refurbishment and use phases was a key contributor, whereas the production phase accounted for most of the impact in single-use devices. Overall, singleuse fURS had a substantially higher potential environmental and health impact than their reusable counterparts. This study underscores the environmental and health impacts of ureterorenoscopy and highlights the importance of incorporating Planetary Health principles into healthcare practices. It provides a foundation for further analyses and research, aiming to drive transformative action in the healthcare sector toward sustainability.

气候变化对人类健康的潜在影响:一次性与可重复使用设备的生命周期比较评估 柔性输尿管镜。
气候变化对全球健康构成了重大挑战,而医疗程序又大大增加了二氧化碳的排放量。作为更广泛的医疗保健领域的一部分,泌尿外科已开始融入 "行星健康 "理念来解决这一问题。虽然早期的研究侧重于泌尿外科手术的生命周期评估(LCA),但这些评估仍然依赖于数据,对医院内部排放的了解也很有限。本研究介绍了一种分析一次性和可重复使用柔性输尿管镜(fURS)院内生命周期评估过程的方法。生命周期评估方法用于评估 fURS 在整个生命周期(包括生产、使用阶段、后处理、维护和处置)中产生的温室气体排放量(CO2 当量,CO2-eq)。该研究估算了每使用一小时的全球升温潜能值 (GWP),并使用 ReCiPe2016(H) 方法评估了相关的健康影响,该方法测量的是残疾调整生命年 (DALYs)。结果表明,对于可重复使用的 fURS,假设每个设备使用 133 次,每使用 11 次后进行维护,每次使用产生 1.24 千克二氧化碳当量,相当于 1.15E-06 DALYs。相比之下,一次性尿道外口装置每次使用产生 4.93 千克二氧化碳当量,相当于 4.57E-06 DALYs。生产和后处理阶段对环境和健康的影响最大。对于可重复使用的尿囊素,翻新和使用阶段所需的电力是造成影响的主要因素,而生产阶段对一次性使用装置的影响最大。总体而言,一次性尿囊素对环境和健康的潜在影响远远高于可重复使用的同类产品。这项研究强调了输尿管镜检查对环境和健康的影响,并强调了将 "行星健康 "原则纳入医疗保健实践的重要性。它为进一步的分析和研究奠定了基础,旨在推动医疗保健领域的变革行动,实现可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信