Breaking up sitting enhances neurocognitive function which is associated with improved postprandial glucose regulation in healthy adults: A randomized crossover study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ting-Yu Chueh, Yung-Chih Chen, Tsung-Min Hung
{"title":"Breaking up sitting enhances neurocognitive function which is associated with improved postprandial glucose regulation in healthy adults: A randomized crossover study.","authors":"Ting-Yu Chueh, Yung-Chih Chen, Tsung-Min Hung","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The glucose-centric hypothesis postulates that glycemic control may influence cognition. While research has examined the effects of breaking up sitting on blood glucose and inhibitory control, few studies have integrated these data and employed event-related potential (ERP) measures to delve into the neuroelectric processes. This study aimed to investigate the effects of breaking up sitting on postprandial blood glucose response, inhibitory control, and P3 component.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen healthy male participants [25 ± 4 years, 23.5 ± 3.2 kg/m² (mean ± SD)] were subjected to 3.5 h uninterrupted sitting (SIT) or with 3 min walking at 6.4 km/h every 30 min (ACTIVE) trials in a randomized crossover design. The Stroop task was administered to assess inhibitory control before and after SIT and ACTIVE trials, and electroencephalography was employed to derive stimulus-elicited P3 component. Finger prick blood glucose levels were collected at baseline, 0.5 h, 1 h, and 3.5 h during the trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While no significant differences were found in inhibitory control performances between trials, greater P3 amplitude was found in the ACTIVE trial relative to the SIT trial (p = .041). Lower postprandial blood glucose iAUC was found in ACTIVE trial compared to SIT trial (p = .028), and this was correlated with the elevation of P3 amplitude (r = - 0.521, p = .023).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Breaking up sitting acutely facilitates neuroelectric indices of attentional processing, which is associated with the optimal postprandial blood glucose control.</p>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"114744"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The glucose-centric hypothesis postulates that glycemic control may influence cognition. While research has examined the effects of breaking up sitting on blood glucose and inhibitory control, few studies have integrated these data and employed event-related potential (ERP) measures to delve into the neuroelectric processes. This study aimed to investigate the effects of breaking up sitting on postprandial blood glucose response, inhibitory control, and P3 component.

Methods: Eighteen healthy male participants [25 ± 4 years, 23.5 ± 3.2 kg/m² (mean ± SD)] were subjected to 3.5 h uninterrupted sitting (SIT) or with 3 min walking at 6.4 km/h every 30 min (ACTIVE) trials in a randomized crossover design. The Stroop task was administered to assess inhibitory control before and after SIT and ACTIVE trials, and electroencephalography was employed to derive stimulus-elicited P3 component. Finger prick blood glucose levels were collected at baseline, 0.5 h, 1 h, and 3.5 h during the trials.

Results: While no significant differences were found in inhibitory control performances between trials, greater P3 amplitude was found in the ACTIVE trial relative to the SIT trial (p = .041). Lower postprandial blood glucose iAUC was found in ACTIVE trial compared to SIT trial (p = .028), and this was correlated with the elevation of P3 amplitude (r = - 0.521, p = .023).

Conclusion: Breaking up sitting acutely facilitates neuroelectric indices of attentional processing, which is associated with the optimal postprandial blood glucose control.

打破坐姿可增强神经认知功能,这与改善健康成年人的餐后血糖调节有关:随机交叉研究
背景和目的:以血糖为中心的假说认为血糖控制可能会影响认知。虽然已有研究探讨了打破坐姿对血糖和抑制控制的影响,但很少有研究整合这些数据并采用事件相关电位(ERP)测量方法来深入研究神经电过程。本研究旨在探讨打破坐姿对餐后血糖反应、抑制控制和 P3 分量的影响:18 名健康男性参与者(25 ± 4 岁,23.5 ± 3.2 kg/m²(平均 ± SD))在随机交叉设计中接受了 3.5 小时不间断坐姿(SIT)或每 30 分钟以 6.4 km/h 的速度步行 3 分钟(ACTIVE)试验。在SIT和ACTIVE试验前后进行Stroop任务以评估抑制控制能力,并采用脑电图得出刺激诱发的P3分量。分别在基线、试验期间的 0.5 小时、1 小时和 3.5 小时采集指刺血糖水平:结果:虽然不同试验之间的抑制控制表现没有明显差异,但在 ACTIVE 试验中发现 P3 振幅比 SIT 试验大(p = .041)。与 SIT 试验相比,ACTIVE 试验的餐后血糖 iAUC 更低(p = .028),这与 P3 振幅的升高相关(r = - .521,p = .023):结论:打破久坐能促进注意力处理的神经电指数,这与最佳的餐后血糖控制有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiology & Behavior
Physiology & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
274
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信