Prevalence and Treatment Patterns of Lichen Planus.

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Natalia Pelet Del Toro, Andrew Strunk, Amit Garg, George Han
{"title":"Prevalence and Treatment Patterns of Lichen Planus.","authors":"Natalia Pelet Del Toro, Andrew Strunk, Amit Garg, George Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic mucocutaneous inflammatory disease with significant morbidity but data on epidemiology and therapeutics for LP is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe overall prevalence of LP and dermatologist-prescribed LP treatments in US adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Explorys database, we analyzed prevalence of overall LP and dermatologists' utilization of medications of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 566,851 eligible patients in the prevalence analysis, there were 1,098 LP cases with a median age of 66 years. Overall crude prevalence of LP was 0.19% (95% CI 0.18-0.21) with higher prevalence in females (prevalence ratio vs. males 1.77, 95% CI 1.53-2.05). Standardized overall prevalence was 0.15%. Most LP patients diagnosed by dermatologists remained untreated after one year (n=1,061, 53%); the most common initial treatment was topical corticosteroids (38%). Treatment continuation after 1 year and switching were most common after initial use of systemic immunosuppressants (28% and 46%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The lack of a precise diagnosis code for non-oral LP allows for the potential of misclassification; disease severity cannot be established.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Standardized prevalence of overall LP was 0.15%. For patients requiring systemic immunosuppressive medications, treatment continuation and switching were more common, suggesting that further research into medication selection for LP may be clinically beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":17198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.081","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic mucocutaneous inflammatory disease with significant morbidity but data on epidemiology and therapeutics for LP is limited.

Objective: Describe overall prevalence of LP and dermatologist-prescribed LP treatments in US adults.

Methods: Using the Explorys database, we analyzed prevalence of overall LP and dermatologists' utilization of medications of interest.

Results: Among 566,851 eligible patients in the prevalence analysis, there were 1,098 LP cases with a median age of 66 years. Overall crude prevalence of LP was 0.19% (95% CI 0.18-0.21) with higher prevalence in females (prevalence ratio vs. males 1.77, 95% CI 1.53-2.05). Standardized overall prevalence was 0.15%. Most LP patients diagnosed by dermatologists remained untreated after one year (n=1,061, 53%); the most common initial treatment was topical corticosteroids (38%). Treatment continuation after 1 year and switching were most common after initial use of systemic immunosuppressants (28% and 46%, respectively).

Limitations: The lack of a precise diagnosis code for non-oral LP allows for the potential of misclassification; disease severity cannot be established.

Conclusions and relevance: Standardized prevalence of overall LP was 0.15%. For patients requiring systemic immunosuppressive medications, treatment continuation and switching were more common, suggesting that further research into medication selection for LP may be clinically beneficial.

扁平苔藓的发病率和治疗模式。
背景:扁平苔藓(LP)是一种慢性皮肤粘膜炎症,发病率很高,但有关扁平苔藓流行病学和治疗方法的数据却很有限:目的:描述美国成人扁平苔藓的总体发病率和皮肤科医生开出的扁平苔藓治疗处方:方法:利用Explorys数据库,我们分析了LP的总体患病率和皮肤科医生对相关药物的使用情况:在 566,851 名符合流行率分析条件的患者中,有 1,098 例 LP 病例,中位年龄为 66 岁。LP 的总体粗流行率为 0.19%(95% CI 0.18-0.21),女性的流行率较高(与男性相比,流行率为 1.77,95% CI 1.53-2.05)。标准化总患病率为 0.15%。大多数由皮肤科医生诊断的 LP 患者在一年后仍未接受治疗(人数=1,061,53%);最常见的初始治疗是局部皮质类固醇激素(38%)。最初使用全身性免疫抑制剂后,1 年后继续治疗和更换治疗方法的情况最为常见(分别为 28% 和 46% ):局限性:非口服 LP 缺乏精确的诊断代码,因此可能存在分类错误;无法确定疾病的严重程度:总体 LP 的标准化患病率为 0.15%。对于需要使用全身性免疫抑制剂的患者,继续治疗和更换治疗方法的情况更为常见,这表明进一步研究 LP 的用药选择可能对临床有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
2023
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) is the official scientific publication of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Its primary goal is to cater to the educational requirements of the dermatology community. Being the top journal in the field, JAAD publishes original articles that have undergone peer review. These articles primarily focus on clinical, investigative, and population-based studies related to dermatology. Another key area of emphasis is research on healthcare delivery and quality of care. JAAD also highlights high-quality, cost-effective, and innovative treatments within the field. In addition to this, the journal covers new diagnostic techniques and various other topics relevant to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of skin, hair, and nail disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信