The potential for attractive toxic sugar baits to complement core malaria interventions strategies: the need for more evidence.

Abstract

Despite its success, the increased use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) has contributed to the development of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors and shifts in biting patterns of the primary malaria vectors. The limitations portrayed by ITNs and IRS suggest that their use alone will not reduce malaria to elimination levels as the remaining untargeted vectors continue to sustain residual malaria transmission (RMT). RMT is a big challenge to malaria elimination because even at 100% ITN and IRS coverage, malaria transmission persists as outdoor vectors avoid or reduce contact with such interventions. With the recent increase in the outdoor biting Anopheles arabiensis (hard to control using routine tools), in most African countries, including Malawi, novel tools such as the attractive toxic sugar baits (ATSBs), targeting outdoor biting vectors in addition to controlling indoor vectors are greatly needed to complement current tools, and could facilitate sustainable malaria control. The ATSB is one potential tool that has been tested in different settings with promising results, and more trials are ongoing in other African countries. ATSBs have been attributed to reductions of mosquito densities and malaria incidence with over 80% and 50%, respectively, and there is hope that by 2025, ATSBs would be considered for the World Health Organization prequalification listing as a complementary tool for mosquito control. This article highlights evidence that ATSBs can advance malaria elimination by complementing indoor-based tools. However, for effective control programmes and elimination campaigns, the use of ATSBs alone might not be adequate, and this article recommends the combined use of ATSBs with either IRS or ITNs.