Shengtao Li, Bo Liu, Rui Ma, Kangpeng Li, Qiang Zhang
{"title":"ERAS perioperative management measures in total hip replacement in HIV-positive patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.","authors":"Shengtao Li, Bo Liu, Rui Ma, Kangpeng Li, Qiang Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05255-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in HIV-positive patients diagnosed with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) undergoing total hip replacement (THR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included 80 HIV-positive patients diagnosed with ONFH who underwent THR between 2011 and 2022. Forty patients treated before August 2019 constituted the control group, receiving standard antiviral regimens and traditional perioperative management pathways. The remaining 40 patients, treated after August 2019, formed the study group, which followed the ERAS protocol. This protocol emphasized the use of more effective antiviral medications, rapid viral load reduction, immune enhancement, improved nutritional status, control of co-infections, prophylactic antibiotics, and anti-osteoporosis measures. We recorded patients' general status and imaging examinations before surgery, as well as detailed perioperative management strategies, antiviral regimens, durations, and immunological indicators for both groups. Targeted and standardized treatment measures were applied to the ERAS group, allowing for a comparison of the efficacy of perioperative management between the two patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative nutritional and immune indicators were lower in the control group than in the study group, while inflammatory markers were higher. Postoperatively, immune, nutritional, and inflammatory indicators were significantly better in the ERAS group compared to the control group. Following antiviral treatment, the viral load was predominantly undetectable in the ERAS group (target not detected, TND). Comprehensive measures minimized complications in the ERAS group (P = 0.028, P < 0.05). The hospitalization duration for the ERAS group was significantly shorter than that of the control group, with both groups showing marked improvement compared to preoperative conditions and no incidents of loosening or dislocation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strengthening antiviral treatment, anti-infective strategies, incision care, and nutritional support effectively prevents and reduces complications such as delayed wound healing in HIV-positive patients. The implementation of ERAS measures requires careful attention to the patient's immune status, close monitoring of clinical changes, and timely adjustments to treatment and care plans.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Treatment studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"787"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05255-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in HIV-positive patients diagnosed with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) undergoing total hip replacement (THR).
Methods: We retrospectively included 80 HIV-positive patients diagnosed with ONFH who underwent THR between 2011 and 2022. Forty patients treated before August 2019 constituted the control group, receiving standard antiviral regimens and traditional perioperative management pathways. The remaining 40 patients, treated after August 2019, formed the study group, which followed the ERAS protocol. This protocol emphasized the use of more effective antiviral medications, rapid viral load reduction, immune enhancement, improved nutritional status, control of co-infections, prophylactic antibiotics, and anti-osteoporosis measures. We recorded patients' general status and imaging examinations before surgery, as well as detailed perioperative management strategies, antiviral regimens, durations, and immunological indicators for both groups. Targeted and standardized treatment measures were applied to the ERAS group, allowing for a comparison of the efficacy of perioperative management between the two patient groups.
Results: Preoperative nutritional and immune indicators were lower in the control group than in the study group, while inflammatory markers were higher. Postoperatively, immune, nutritional, and inflammatory indicators were significantly better in the ERAS group compared to the control group. Following antiviral treatment, the viral load was predominantly undetectable in the ERAS group (target not detected, TND). Comprehensive measures minimized complications in the ERAS group (P = 0.028, P < 0.05). The hospitalization duration for the ERAS group was significantly shorter than that of the control group, with both groups showing marked improvement compared to preoperative conditions and no incidents of loosening or dislocation.
Conclusion: Strengthening antiviral treatment, anti-infective strategies, incision care, and nutritional support effectively prevents and reduces complications such as delayed wound healing in HIV-positive patients. The implementation of ERAS measures requires careful attention to the patient's immune status, close monitoring of clinical changes, and timely adjustments to treatment and care plans.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.