Initial expressed emotion during neuropsychological assessment: investigating motivational dimensions of approach and avoidance.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karlee Patrick, Erin Burke, John Gunstad, Mary Beth Spitznagel
{"title":"Initial expressed emotion during neuropsychological assessment: investigating motivational dimensions of approach and avoidance.","authors":"Karlee Patrick, Erin Burke, John Gunstad, Mary Beth Spitznagel","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2024.2432655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prior work indicates that discrete emotions are linked to performance across multiple domains of cognitive function and thus have the potential to impact cognitive profiles in neuropsychological assessment. However, reported presence and magnitude of the relationships between emotion and cognitive test performance are inconsistent. Variable findings in this regard could be due to failure to consider motivations associated with expressed emotion. To better understand the potential impact of expressed emotion on neuropsychological test performance, it may be beneficial to consider approach and avoidance motivation during assessment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The current cross-sectional study examined associations between cognitive performance and digitally phenotyped facial expressions of discrete emotions on dimensions of approach (i.e. joy, sadness, anger) and avoidance (i.e. fear, disgust) in the context of virtual neuropsychological assessment in 104 adults (ages 55-90).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial facial expressions categorized as anger and joy predicted later reduced cognitive performance in aspects of memory and executive function within the virtual session, respectively. Test performance was associated neither with sadness nor with avoidance emotions (i.e. disgust or fear).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results of the current study did not strongly align with approach/avoidance explanations for links between emotion and cognitive performance; however, results might support an arousal-based explanation, as joy and anger are both high arousal emotions. Additional investigation is needed to understand the intersection of emotion motivation and physiological arousal in the context of neuropsychological assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2432655","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Prior work indicates that discrete emotions are linked to performance across multiple domains of cognitive function and thus have the potential to impact cognitive profiles in neuropsychological assessment. However, reported presence and magnitude of the relationships between emotion and cognitive test performance are inconsistent. Variable findings in this regard could be due to failure to consider motivations associated with expressed emotion. To better understand the potential impact of expressed emotion on neuropsychological test performance, it may be beneficial to consider approach and avoidance motivation during assessment.

Method: The current cross-sectional study examined associations between cognitive performance and digitally phenotyped facial expressions of discrete emotions on dimensions of approach (i.e. joy, sadness, anger) and avoidance (i.e. fear, disgust) in the context of virtual neuropsychological assessment in 104 adults (ages 55-90).

Results: Initial facial expressions categorized as anger and joy predicted later reduced cognitive performance in aspects of memory and executive function within the virtual session, respectively. Test performance was associated neither with sadness nor with avoidance emotions (i.e. disgust or fear).

Conclusions: Results of the current study did not strongly align with approach/avoidance explanations for links between emotion and cognitive performance; however, results might support an arousal-based explanation, as joy and anger are both high arousal emotions. Additional investigation is needed to understand the intersection of emotion motivation and physiological arousal in the context of neuropsychological assessment.

神经心理学评估过程中的初始情绪表达:研究接近和回避的动机维度。
目的:先前的研究表明,离散情绪与认知功能多个领域的表现有关,因此有可能影响神经心理学评估中的认知概况。然而,关于情绪与认知测试成绩之间关系的存在和程度的报道并不一致。这方面不同的研究结果可能是由于没有考虑到与表达情绪相关的动机。为了更好地了解表达情绪对神经心理学测试成绩的潜在影响,在评估过程中考虑接近和回避动机可能会有所裨益:本横断面研究考察了 104 名成年人(55-90 岁)在虚拟神经心理学评估中的认知表现与数字表型的离散情绪面部表情在接近(即喜悦、悲伤、愤怒)和回避(即恐惧、厌恶)维度上的关联:结果:最初被归类为愤怒和喜悦的面部表情分别预示着后来在虚拟会话中记忆和执行功能方面认知能力的下降。测试成绩既与悲伤情绪无关,也与回避情绪(即厌恶或恐惧)无关:目前的研究结果与情绪和认知表现之间联系的接近/回避解释并不十分吻合;然而,研究结果可能支持基于唤醒的解释,因为喜悦和愤怒都是高唤醒情绪。要了解神经心理学评估中情绪动机和生理唤醒的交叉点,还需要进行更多的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信