Outcomes of liver transplantation with donors older than 80 years in HCV patients treated with direct-action antivirals vs. non-HCV patients.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Oscar Caso Maestro, Virginia García Moreno, Iago Justo Alonso, Alberto Marcacuzco Quinto, Jose María Aguado, Carmelo Loinaz Segurola, Carlos Jiménez Romero
{"title":"Outcomes of liver transplantation with donors older than 80 years in HCV patients treated with direct-action antivirals vs. non-HCV patients.","authors":"Oscar Caso Maestro, Virginia García Moreno, Iago Justo Alonso, Alberto Marcacuzco Quinto, Jose María Aguado, Carmelo Loinaz Segurola, Carlos Jiménez Romero","doi":"10.1016/j.medcli.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple studies have shown good results with the use of octogenarian donors in non-HCV recipients and its use is universally accepted worldwide. There are no studies analyzing differences between hepatitis C virus (HCV) and non-HCV recipients transplanted with donors≥80 years in the direct-action antivirals (DAA) period. The rate of liver transplantation (LT) using old donors is still low, and a change in the acceptance of these grafts could increase the liver pool available for LT.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Since the introduction of DAA therapy in our hospital in January 2014 to May 2022, 457 LT were performed, and 74 (16.2%) of these patients underwent LT with donors≥80 years. A cohort study was carried-out comparing 15 HCV-positive recipients vs. 59 HCV-negative patients during the period of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recipients were younger in the non-HCV group. MELD and subsequently DMELD were higher in non-HCV group. Nevertheless, the association of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with HCV cirrhosis was higher than with non-HCV cirrhosis (86.7% vs. 28.8%; p<0.001), but there were no recurrences within HCV group and only 1 case in the non-HCV group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-years patient and graft survival were similar in both groups. Recipient age and intraoperative transfusion requirements were predictors of graft survival [(HR 1.10, 95CI 1.01-1.21; p=0.03) and (HR 1.03, 95CI 1.01-1.05; p<0.001), respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, the use of octogenarian donors was a safe alternative to younger donors in HCV recipients requiring LT in the era of DAA with similar results to those obtained in non-HCV patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18578,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Clinica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2024.09.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple studies have shown good results with the use of octogenarian donors in non-HCV recipients and its use is universally accepted worldwide. There are no studies analyzing differences between hepatitis C virus (HCV) and non-HCV recipients transplanted with donors≥80 years in the direct-action antivirals (DAA) period. The rate of liver transplantation (LT) using old donors is still low, and a change in the acceptance of these grafts could increase the liver pool available for LT.

Material and methods: Since the introduction of DAA therapy in our hospital in January 2014 to May 2022, 457 LT were performed, and 74 (16.2%) of these patients underwent LT with donors≥80 years. A cohort study was carried-out comparing 15 HCV-positive recipients vs. 59 HCV-negative patients during the period of the study.

Results: Recipients were younger in the non-HCV group. MELD and subsequently DMELD were higher in non-HCV group. Nevertheless, the association of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with HCV cirrhosis was higher than with non-HCV cirrhosis (86.7% vs. 28.8%; p<0.001), but there were no recurrences within HCV group and only 1 case in the non-HCV group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-years patient and graft survival were similar in both groups. Recipient age and intraoperative transfusion requirements were predictors of graft survival [(HR 1.10, 95CI 1.01-1.21; p=0.03) and (HR 1.03, 95CI 1.01-1.05; p<0.001), respectively].

Conclusions: In conclusion, the use of octogenarian donors was a safe alternative to younger donors in HCV recipients requiring LT in the era of DAA with similar results to those obtained in non-HCV patients.

接受直接作用抗病毒药物治疗的 80 岁以上 HCV 患者与非 HCV 患者的肝移植供体对比结果。
背景:多项研究表明,在非 HCV 受体中使用八旬供体取得了良好的效果,其使用已被全世界普遍接受。目前还没有研究分析在直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)时期,丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和非丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)受体在使用≥80 岁供体进行移植时的差异。使用高龄供体进行肝移植(LT)的比例仍然很低,改变对这些移植物的接受程度可以增加可用于LT的肝脏库:自2014年1月我院引入DAA疗法至2022年5月,共实施了457例LT,其中74例(16.2%)患者接受了供体年龄≥80岁的LT。在研究期间,对15名HCV阳性受者与59名HCV阴性患者进行了队列研究:结果:非 HCV 组的受者更年轻。结果:非 HCV 组的受者更年轻,非 HCV 组的 MELD 及随后的 DMELD 更高。然而,肝细胞癌(HCC)与HCV肝硬化的相关性高于非HCV肝硬化(86.7%对28.8%;P结论:总之,在DAA时代,对于需要接受LT治疗的HCV受者而言,使用八旬老人供体是年轻供体的安全替代方案,其结果与非HCV患者相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina Clinica
Medicina Clinica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
295
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Medicina Clínica, fundada en 1943, es una publicación quincenal dedicada a la promoción de la investigación y de la práctica clínica entre los especialistas de la medicina interna, así como otras especialidades. Son características fundamentales de esta publicación el rigor científico y metodológico de sus artículos, la actualidad de los temas y, sobre todo, su sentido práctico, buscando siempre que la información sea de la mayor utilidad en la práctica clínica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信