Risk factors and prognostic analysis of vitreous cavity opacification after silicone oil removal.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jingsheng Yi, Zijing Huang, Wai Kit Chu, Dezhi Zheng, Jianlong Zheng, Weiqi Chen, Qihong Li, Dingguo Huang
{"title":"Risk factors and prognostic analysis of vitreous cavity opacification after silicone oil removal.","authors":"Jingsheng Yi, Zijing Huang, Wai Kit Chu, Dezhi Zheng, Jianlong Zheng, Weiqi Chen, Qihong Li, Dingguo Huang","doi":"10.1007/s10792-024-03364-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the risk factors for postoperative vitreous cavity opacification following pars plana silicone oil removal and its impact on prognostic visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted. A total of 66 eyes from 66 patients were enrolled in the study. On the first postoperative day, all patients underwent a scanning laser ophthalmoscopy to assess the turbidity of the vitreous cavity. 42.42% (28/66) were categorized as Grade 0, 36% (24/66) as Grade I, and 21% (14/66) as Grade II, based on the visibility of posterior pole blood vessels. Ordered multiple classification logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate the impact of surgical and baseline factors on the occurrence and severity of vitreous cavity opacification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence of high myopia and the intraoperative combination of epiretinal membrane peeling exhibited significant correlations with the development of postoperative vitreous cavity opacification (OR = 3.424, 95% CI 2.326-31.643, P = 0.023; OR = 3.612, 95% CI 1.263-14.676, P = 0.031, respectively). The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on the first day post-surgery was significantly reduced across all degrees of opacification compared to the preoperative level (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference in BCVA was detected between the preoperative period, one-week post-operation, and the last follow-up (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High myopia and intraoperative epiretinal membrane peeling may be associated with the development of more severe vitreous cavity opacity following silicone oil removal. This opacity generally resolves within one week post-surgery and does not appear to increase the risk of retinal re-detachment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"44 1","pages":"438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03364-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the risk factors for postoperative vitreous cavity opacification following pars plana silicone oil removal and its impact on prognostic visual acuity.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted. A total of 66 eyes from 66 patients were enrolled in the study. On the first postoperative day, all patients underwent a scanning laser ophthalmoscopy to assess the turbidity of the vitreous cavity. 42.42% (28/66) were categorized as Grade 0, 36% (24/66) as Grade I, and 21% (14/66) as Grade II, based on the visibility of posterior pole blood vessels. Ordered multiple classification logistic regression analysis was employed to investigate the impact of surgical and baseline factors on the occurrence and severity of vitreous cavity opacification.

Results: The presence of high myopia and the intraoperative combination of epiretinal membrane peeling exhibited significant correlations with the development of postoperative vitreous cavity opacification (OR = 3.424, 95% CI 2.326-31.643, P = 0.023; OR = 3.612, 95% CI 1.263-14.676, P = 0.031, respectively). The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) on the first day post-surgery was significantly reduced across all degrees of opacification compared to the preoperative level (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference in BCVA was detected between the preoperative period, one-week post-operation, and the last follow-up (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: High myopia and intraoperative epiretinal membrane peeling may be associated with the development of more severe vitreous cavity opacity following silicone oil removal. This opacity generally resolves within one week post-surgery and does not appear to increase the risk of retinal re-detachment.

硅油去除后玻璃体腔不透明的风险因素和预后分析。
目的:本研究旨在探讨平面旁硅油摘除术后玻璃体腔不透明的风险因素及其对预后视力的影响:方法:进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究。研究共纳入了 66 名患者的 66 只眼睛。术后第一天,所有患者都接受了扫描激光眼底镜检查,以评估玻璃体腔的浑浊度。根据后极血管的可见度,42.42%(28/66)的患者被分为 0 级,36%(24/66)的患者被分为 I 级,21%(14/66)的患者被分为 II 级。采用有序多元分类逻辑回归分析研究了手术因素和基线因素对玻璃体腔混浊发生率和严重程度的影响:结果:高度近视和术中联合剥离视网膜外膜与术后玻璃体腔不透明的发生有显著相关性(OR = 3.424,95% CI 2.326-31.643,P = 0.023;OR = 3.612,95% CI 1.263-14.676,P = 0.031)。与术前水平相比,术后第一天的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)在所有遮盖度数上都显著降低(P 0.05):结论:高度近视和术中视网膜外膜剥离可能与硅油摘除术后出现更严重的玻璃体腔混浊有关。这种混浊一般会在术后一周内消退,似乎不会增加视网膜再次脱离的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信