Examining the relationship between racial, ethnic and economic residential segregation and cigarette smoking among a nationally representative sample of young adults.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shyanika W Rose, Mary Kay Rayens, Mona Azadi, Elexis Kierstead, Amanda Y Kong, Kimberly Horn
{"title":"Examining the relationship between racial, ethnic and economic residential segregation and cigarette smoking among a nationally representative sample of young adults.","authors":"Shyanika W Rose, Mary Kay Rayens, Mona Azadi, Elexis Kierstead, Amanda Y Kong, Kimberly Horn","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Predominantly Black, Hispanic or Latino and lower income communities are overexposed to tobacco. This study investigated the relationship between cigarette smoking and racial/ethnic and economic segregation using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationally representative sample of 4,091 18-34-year-olds was surveyed September-October 2016. We calculated census-tract population estimates to form ICE measures for ethnicity, race, income, ethnicity and income, and race and income. Quintiles were determined, with Quintile 1 (Q1) representing the most Hispanic/Latino, Black, and lowest-income neighborhoods and Q5 the most non-Hispanic/Latino, White, and highest-income. State fixed effects logistic regression models, weighted for national representativeness, assessed the relationship between ICE measures and past 30-day cigarette use, controlling for individual smoking correlates (e.g. income, race/ethnicity, tobacco use, etc.).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For racial/ethnic segregation alone, individuals in neighborhoods with the highest proportions of Hispanic/Latino vs. non-Hispanic/Latino (Q5 vs Q1-Q4 range 1.47-1.79) and Black vs White residents had higher smoking risk (Q5 vs Q1 (1.41) and Q2 (1.40)). For economic segregation, individuals in Q2 and Q3 neighborhoods had higher smoking risk than those in Q5 (Q5 vs Q2 (1.60) and Q3 (1.73)), but smoking risk did not differ between Q1 and Q5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this sample, living in areas with the most Hispanic/Latino and Black residents was associated with the highest smoking risk, while living in areas with highest income residents was associated with lowest smoking risk, even controlling for individual factors. Understanding the impact of ethnic, racial and economic segregation on smoking behaviors informs targeted interventions to reduce tobacco overexposure.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The study's findings highlight the association between neighborhood socioeconomic factors and cigarette smoking. Racial and ethnic segregation is associated with higher smoking rates. The combined influence of racial, ethnic, and economic factors adds intricacy to the association between segregation and the risk of smoking. This research is significant as it provides valuable insights for designing focused interventions aimed at mitigating tobacco overexposure in predominantly Black, Hispanic/Latino, and low-income neighborhoods.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Predominantly Black, Hispanic or Latino and lower income communities are overexposed to tobacco. This study investigated the relationship between cigarette smoking and racial/ethnic and economic segregation using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE).

Methods: A nationally representative sample of 4,091 18-34-year-olds was surveyed September-October 2016. We calculated census-tract population estimates to form ICE measures for ethnicity, race, income, ethnicity and income, and race and income. Quintiles were determined, with Quintile 1 (Q1) representing the most Hispanic/Latino, Black, and lowest-income neighborhoods and Q5 the most non-Hispanic/Latino, White, and highest-income. State fixed effects logistic regression models, weighted for national representativeness, assessed the relationship between ICE measures and past 30-day cigarette use, controlling for individual smoking correlates (e.g. income, race/ethnicity, tobacco use, etc.).

Results: For racial/ethnic segregation alone, individuals in neighborhoods with the highest proportions of Hispanic/Latino vs. non-Hispanic/Latino (Q5 vs Q1-Q4 range 1.47-1.79) and Black vs White residents had higher smoking risk (Q5 vs Q1 (1.41) and Q2 (1.40)). For economic segregation, individuals in Q2 and Q3 neighborhoods had higher smoking risk than those in Q5 (Q5 vs Q2 (1.60) and Q3 (1.73)), but smoking risk did not differ between Q1 and Q5.

Conclusions: In this sample, living in areas with the most Hispanic/Latino and Black residents was associated with the highest smoking risk, while living in areas with highest income residents was associated with lowest smoking risk, even controlling for individual factors. Understanding the impact of ethnic, racial and economic segregation on smoking behaviors informs targeted interventions to reduce tobacco overexposure.

Implications: The study's findings highlight the association between neighborhood socioeconomic factors and cigarette smoking. Racial and ethnic segregation is associated with higher smoking rates. The combined influence of racial, ethnic, and economic factors adds intricacy to the association between segregation and the risk of smoking. This research is significant as it provides valuable insights for designing focused interventions aimed at mitigating tobacco overexposure in predominantly Black, Hispanic/Latino, and low-income neighborhoods.

研究具有全国代表性的年轻成年人样本中种族、民族和经济居住隔离与吸烟之间的关系。
导言:以黑人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔为主的低收入社区过度接触烟草。本研究使用极端集中指数(ICE)调查了吸烟与种族/民族和经济隔离之间的关系:我们于 2016 年 9 月至 10 月对 4091 名 18-34 岁的年轻人进行了具有全国代表性的抽样调查。我们计算了人口普查区的人口估计数,以形成民族、种族、收入、民族和收入以及种族和收入的 ICE 测量值。我们确定了五分位数,其中五分位数 1(Q1)代表西班牙裔/拉美裔、黑人和收入最低的社区,五分位数 5 代表非西班牙裔/拉美裔、白人和收入最高的社区。在控制个人吸烟相关因素(如收入、种族/民族、烟草使用等)的情况下,根据全国代表性加权的州固定效应逻辑回归模型评估了 ICE 指标与过去 30 天吸烟情况之间的关系:仅就种族/族裔隔离而言,在西班牙裔/拉美裔居民与非西班牙裔/拉美裔居民比例最高的社区(Q5 与 Q1-Q4 相比范围为 1.47-1.79)以及黑人与白人居民比例最高的社区(Q5 与 Q1(1.41)和 Q2(1.40)相比),个人的吸烟风险较高。在经济隔离方面,Q2和Q3社区居民的吸烟风险高于Q5社区居民(Q5 vs Q2 (1.60)和Q3 (1.73)),但Q1和Q5社区居民的吸烟风险没有差异:在该样本中,即使控制了个体因素,居住在拉美裔和黑人居民最多的地区的吸烟风险最高,而居住在收入最高的地区的吸烟风险最低。了解民族、种族和经济隔离对吸烟行为的影响有助于采取有针对性的干预措施,减少烟草过度暴露:研究结果强调了社区社会经济因素与吸烟之间的关系。种族和民族隔离与较高的吸烟率有关。种族、民族和经济因素的综合影响使隔离与吸烟风险之间的关系更加复杂。这项研究意义重大,因为它为设计有针对性的干预措施提供了宝贵的见解,这些干预措施旨在减少黑人、西班牙裔/拉美裔和低收入社区的烟草过度暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信