Influences of speaking task demands on sensorimotor oscillations in adults who stutter: Implications for speech motor control.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Edward C Brown, Andrew Bowers, M Blake Rafferty, Devin M Casenhiser, Kevin Reilly, Ashley Harkrider, Tim Saltuklaroglu
{"title":"Influences of speaking task demands on sensorimotor oscillations in adults who stutter: Implications for speech motor control.","authors":"Edward C Brown, Andrew Bowers, M Blake Rafferty, Devin M Casenhiser, Kevin Reilly, Ashley Harkrider, Tim Saltuklaroglu","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.10.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Motivated by previous inconsistent findings, this study aims to improve understanding of sensorimotor beta (β; 15-30 Hz) and alpha (α; 8-14 Hz) speech-related power differences between stuttering and non-stuttering adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electroencephalography was recorded as adults who stutter (AWS) and matched fluent controls answered questions in Quiet and Informational Masked backgrounds. Bilateral sensorimotor β and α power during speech planning and execution were measured from mu (μ) rhythm components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, AWS exhibited reduced left hemisphere β and α power in both speaking conditions during speech planning and execution. AWS displayed reduced left α power in the Informational Masking compared to Quiet. Within AWS β and α power, which were tightly coupled, oppositely predicted stuttering severity and β-α dissociation (β minus α) was the strongest predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither β nor α power are reliable markers of speech motor stability due to their sensitivity to speech task automaticity. However, relationships between these two sensorimotor rhythms warrant further investigation for understanding motor control.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Data help explain previous mixed findings in reference to extant models of speech motor control in stuttering and may have clinical implications for developing neurostimulation protocols targeting improved speech fluency.</p>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2024.10.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Motivated by previous inconsistent findings, this study aims to improve understanding of sensorimotor beta (β; 15-30 Hz) and alpha (α; 8-14 Hz) speech-related power differences between stuttering and non-stuttering adults.

Methods: Electroencephalography was recorded as adults who stutter (AWS) and matched fluent controls answered questions in Quiet and Informational Masked backgrounds. Bilateral sensorimotor β and α power during speech planning and execution were measured from mu (μ) rhythm components.

Results: Compared to controls, AWS exhibited reduced left hemisphere β and α power in both speaking conditions during speech planning and execution. AWS displayed reduced left α power in the Informational Masking compared to Quiet. Within AWS β and α power, which were tightly coupled, oppositely predicted stuttering severity and β-α dissociation (β minus α) was the strongest predictor.

Conclusion: Neither β nor α power are reliable markers of speech motor stability due to their sensitivity to speech task automaticity. However, relationships between these two sensorimotor rhythms warrant further investigation for understanding motor control.

Significance: Data help explain previous mixed findings in reference to extant models of speech motor control in stuttering and may have clinical implications for developing neurostimulation protocols targeting improved speech fluency.

说话任务要求对口吃成人感觉运动振荡的影响:对言语运动控制的影响
研究目的由于以前的研究结果不一致,本研究旨在加深对口吃成人和非口吃成人之间与言语相关的感觉运动β(β;15-30赫兹)和α(α;8-14赫兹)功率差异的理解:在口吃成人(AWS)和匹配的流利对照组在安静和信息掩蔽背景下回答问题时记录脑电图。结果:与对照组相比,口吃成人在语言计划和执行过程中的双侧感觉运动 β 和 α 功率降低:结果:与对照组相比,AWS 在语音规划和执行过程中的两种说话条件下都表现出左半球 β 和 α 功率减弱。与安静时相比,AWS 在信息屏蔽时显示出左半球 α 功率降低。在AWS中,β和α功率是紧密联系在一起的,它们对口吃严重程度的预测是相反的,β-α分离(β减α)是最强的预测因素:结论:β 和 α 功率都不是言语运动稳定性的可靠标志,因为它们对言语任务的自动性非常敏感。然而,这两种感觉运动节奏之间的关系值得进一步研究,以了解运动控制:数据有助于解释以前关于口吃患者言语运动控制的现有模型的混合研究结果,并可能对开发以改善言语流利性为目标的神经刺激方案具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
932
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology. Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信