Evaluation of herbicide toxicity to Lemna minor L. and Azolla caroliniana Willd.

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Bruna Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruno Barburgian Ramalho Siqueira, Rafaela Oliva da Silva, Patrícia Andrea Monquero
{"title":"Evaluation of herbicide toxicity to Lemna minor L. and Azolla caroliniana Willd.","authors":"Bruna Ferrari Schedenffeldt, Bruno Barburgian Ramalho Siqueira, Rafaela Oliva da Silva, Patrícia Andrea Monquero","doi":"10.1007/s10646-024-02829-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-residual herbicides can negatively impact aquatic ecosystems through surface runoff and leaching. This study evaluated the acute toxicity of indaziflam, sulfentrazone, clomazone, and tebuthiuron on Lemna minor and Azolla caroliniana. Experiments were conducted in the laboratory using a completely randomized design (CRD) with six concentrations of each herbicide across four replicates. The study assessed the concentration causing acute effects in 50% of the organisms (EC<sub>50</sub>), the effects on fresh weight (g), and the risk quotient (RQ). For L. minor, EC<sub>50</sub> values were 0.41, 0.73, 0.12, and 0.21 mg L⁻¹ for clomazone, sulfentrazone, indaziflam, and tebuthiuron, respectively; and for A. caroliniana, the values were 3.26, 0.51, 0.11, and 0.71 mg L⁻¹, respectively. All tested herbicides were classified as highly toxic to macrophyte species, except for clomazone, which was categorized as 'moderately toxic' for A. caroliniana. Moreover, these herbicides significantly reduced fresh weight even at the lowest concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02829-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-residual herbicides can negatively impact aquatic ecosystems through surface runoff and leaching. This study evaluated the acute toxicity of indaziflam, sulfentrazone, clomazone, and tebuthiuron on Lemna minor and Azolla caroliniana. Experiments were conducted in the laboratory using a completely randomized design (CRD) with six concentrations of each herbicide across four replicates. The study assessed the concentration causing acute effects in 50% of the organisms (EC50), the effects on fresh weight (g), and the risk quotient (RQ). For L. minor, EC50 values were 0.41, 0.73, 0.12, and 0.21 mg L⁻¹ for clomazone, sulfentrazone, indaziflam, and tebuthiuron, respectively; and for A. caroliniana, the values were 3.26, 0.51, 0.11, and 0.71 mg L⁻¹, respectively. All tested herbicides were classified as highly toxic to macrophyte species, except for clomazone, which was categorized as 'moderately toxic' for A. caroliniana. Moreover, these herbicides significantly reduced fresh weight even at the lowest concentrations.

评估除草剂对 Lemna minor L. 和 Azolla caroliniana Willd.
长期残留的除草剂会通过地表径流和沥滤对水生生态系统产生负面影响。本研究评估了茚虫威、磺草酮、氯草酮和特丁噻脲对小百合属(Lemna minor)和红花杜鹃(Azolla caroliniana)的急性毒性。实验在实验室中进行,采用完全随机设计法(CRD),每种除草剂在四个重复中使用六种浓度。研究评估了对 50% 的生物造成急性影响的浓度(EC50)、对鲜重(克)的影响以及风险商数(RQ)。对于 L. minor,氯马酮、磺草酮、茚虫威和特丁硫隆的 EC50 值分别为 0.41、0.73、0.12 和 0.21 mg L-¹;对于 A. caroliniana,EC50 值分别为 3.26、0.51、0.11 和 0.71 mg L-¹。除了氯马隆对 A. caroliniana 的毒性为 "中度 "外,所有测试的除草剂都对大型水草有剧毒。此外,即使浓度最低,这些除草剂也会显著降低鲜重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecotoxicology
Ecotoxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信