Chutian Zhou, Pan Liu, Xinran Luo, Yang Liu, Weibo Liu, Huan Xu, Qian Cheng, Jun Zhang, Kunming Wu
{"title":"Uncertainty analysis method for diagnosing multi-point defects in urban drainage systems","authors":"Chutian Zhou, Pan Liu, Xinran Luo, Yang Liu, Weibo Liu, Huan Xu, Qian Cheng, Jun Zhang, Kunming Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban drainage system (UDS) plays a key role in city urbanization, where defective pipes can lead to seepage. Previous studies have identified the locations of defects in UDS using inverse optimization models. However, the unique optimal solution neglects uncertainty analysis, which may lead to misdiagnosis. In addition, the multi-point defect diagnosis has heavy computational burden due to high dimensional parameters space. To address these issues, this paper proposes a hybrid method that leverages the genetic algorithm (GA) to identify probable space, and then utilizes the adaptive Metropolis (AM) to provide an estimation of the posterior probability distribution (PPD). Firstly, a multi-population GA is employed for the maximum exploration within the model space. Then, AM algorithm is used to explore the final PPD of each pipe defect parameter. The metrics accuracy (<span><math><mrow is=\"true\"><mi is=\"true\">A</mi><mi is=\"true\">C</mi><mi is=\"true\">C</mi></mrow></math></span>), Matthews correlation coefficient (<span><math><mrow is=\"true\"><mi is=\"true\">M</mi><mi is=\"true\">C</mi><mi is=\"true\">C</mi></mrow></math></span>) and mean absolute error (<span><math><mrow is=\"true\"><mi is=\"true\">M</mi><mi is=\"true\">A</mi><mi is=\"true\">E</mi></mrow></math></span>) are used to evaluate the diagnosis performance. A synthetic UDS case with randomized multi-point seepage scenarios is used to validate the method. Results indicate that the proposed hybrid method is effective in diagnosing multi-point defect, with 0.91, 0.78 of the hybrid method and 0.87, 0.69 of the DiffeRential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis method for the <span><math><mrow is=\"true\"><mi is=\"true\">A</mi><mi is=\"true\">C</mi><mi is=\"true\">C</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow is=\"true\"><mi is=\"true\">M</mi><mi is=\"true\">C</mi><mi is=\"true\">C</mi></mrow></math></span>, respectively. Meanwhile, the diagnosis speed has increased by 32%. The result PPD passes the 90% confidence interval validation. The proposed method can provide effective uncertainty analysis to reduce misdiagnosis of the traditional method.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122849","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Urban drainage system (UDS) plays a key role in city urbanization, where defective pipes can lead to seepage. Previous studies have identified the locations of defects in UDS using inverse optimization models. However, the unique optimal solution neglects uncertainty analysis, which may lead to misdiagnosis. In addition, the multi-point defect diagnosis has heavy computational burden due to high dimensional parameters space. To address these issues, this paper proposes a hybrid method that leverages the genetic algorithm (GA) to identify probable space, and then utilizes the adaptive Metropolis (AM) to provide an estimation of the posterior probability distribution (PPD). Firstly, a multi-population GA is employed for the maximum exploration within the model space. Then, AM algorithm is used to explore the final PPD of each pipe defect parameter. The metrics accuracy (), Matthews correlation coefficient () and mean absolute error () are used to evaluate the diagnosis performance. A synthetic UDS case with randomized multi-point seepage scenarios is used to validate the method. Results indicate that the proposed hybrid method is effective in diagnosing multi-point defect, with 0.91, 0.78 of the hybrid method and 0.87, 0.69 of the DiffeRential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis method for the and , respectively. Meanwhile, the diagnosis speed has increased by 32%. The result PPD passes the 90% confidence interval validation. The proposed method can provide effective uncertainty analysis to reduce misdiagnosis of the traditional method.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.