Normal Facial Nerve Enhancement on Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination MRI Sequence.

Nanjiba Nawaz, Amit B Desai, Alok A Bhatt
{"title":"Normal Facial Nerve Enhancement on Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination MRI Sequence.","authors":"Nanjiba Nawaz, Amit B Desai, Alok A Bhatt","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Enhancement of the facial nerve can be seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to its rich arteriovenous plexus. Classically, enhancement of the facial nerve beyond the geniculate ganglion has been described as a normal finding, while enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments is considered abnormal. We hypothesize facial nerve enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments is a normal finding on the post-contrast T-weighted, fat-saturated VIBE (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination) sequence on both 1.5T and 3T scanners.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty patients without facial nerve symptoms undergoing MRI using the internal auditory canal (IAC) protocol were identified at our institution, 25 cases on a 1.5T scanner and 25 cases on a 3T scanner; a total of 100 facial nerves. Presence or absence of enhancement of the facial nerve segments on the postcontrast T1-weighted, fat-saturated VIBE sequence were independently analyzed by two neuroradiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On 1.5T, out of 50 facial nerves evaluated, percentage of nerves with enhancement at each segment was as follows: 80% canalicular, 92% labyrinthine, 100% tympanic, 100% mastoid, and 80% intraparotid. On 3T, out of 50 facial nerves evaluated, percentage of nerves with enhancement at each segment was as follows: 60% canalicular, 84% labyrinthine, 98% tympanic, 100% mastoid, and 93% intraparotid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments of the facial nerve is a normal finding on the postcontrast, T1-weighted fat-saturated VIBE sequence. Careful attention to clinical history and asymmetry should be considered before calling abnormality of the facial nerve.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>IAC, Internal auditory canal; VIBE, Volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Enhancement of the facial nerve can be seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) due to its rich arteriovenous plexus. Classically, enhancement of the facial nerve beyond the geniculate ganglion has been described as a normal finding, while enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments is considered abnormal. We hypothesize facial nerve enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments is a normal finding on the post-contrast T-weighted, fat-saturated VIBE (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination) sequence on both 1.5T and 3T scanners.

Materials and methods: Fifty patients without facial nerve symptoms undergoing MRI using the internal auditory canal (IAC) protocol were identified at our institution, 25 cases on a 1.5T scanner and 25 cases on a 3T scanner; a total of 100 facial nerves. Presence or absence of enhancement of the facial nerve segments on the postcontrast T1-weighted, fat-saturated VIBE sequence were independently analyzed by two neuroradiologists.

Results: On 1.5T, out of 50 facial nerves evaluated, percentage of nerves with enhancement at each segment was as follows: 80% canalicular, 92% labyrinthine, 100% tympanic, 100% mastoid, and 80% intraparotid. On 3T, out of 50 facial nerves evaluated, percentage of nerves with enhancement at each segment was as follows: 60% canalicular, 84% labyrinthine, 98% tympanic, 100% mastoid, and 93% intraparotid.

Conclusions: Enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments of the facial nerve is a normal finding on the postcontrast, T1-weighted fat-saturated VIBE sequence. Careful attention to clinical history and asymmetry should be considered before calling abnormality of the facial nerve.

Abbreviations: IAC, Internal auditory canal; VIBE, Volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.

容积插值屏气检查核磁共振成像序列上的正常面神经增强。
背景和目的:由于面神经有丰富的动静脉丛,因此在磁共振成像(MRI)上可以看到面神经增强。传统上,膝状神经节以外的面神经增强被描述为正常现象,而管状神经节和迷走神经节段的增强则被认为是异常的。我们假设,在 1.5T 和 3T 扫描仪上进行对比后 T 加权、脂肪饱和 VIBE(容积插值屏气检查)序列时,管状节段和迷宫段的面神经增强是正常的:在我院确定了 50 名无面神经症状的患者,采用内耳道 (IAC) 方案进行磁共振成像,其中 25 例在 1.5T 扫描仪上进行,25 例在 3T 扫描仪上进行;共计 100 条面神经。由两名神经放射学专家独立分析对比后 T1 加权、脂肪饱和 VIBE 序列上面神经节段有无增强:在 1.5T 上评估的 50 条面神经中,各节段出现强化的神经百分比如下80%为管状神经,92%为迷走神经,100%为鼓膜神经,100%为乳突神经,80%为颈内神经。在 3T 上,在评估的 50 条面神经中,各节段增强的神经百分比如下:管状神经 60%,迷宫神经 84%,乳突内神经 80%:管状神经占 60%,迷走神经占 84%,鼓膜神经占 98%,乳突神经占 100%,颈内神经占 93%:结论:在对比后的 T1 加权脂肪饱和 VIBE 序列中,面神经管状段和迷宫段的增强是正常的。在判定面神经异常之前,应仔细考虑临床病史和非对称性:缩写:IAC,内耳道;VIBE,容积插值屏气检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信