Normal Facial Nerve Enhancement on Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold Examination MRI Sequence.

Nanjiba Nawaz, Amit B Desai, Alok A Bhatt
{"title":"Normal Facial Nerve Enhancement on Volumetric Interpolated Breath-Hold Examination MRI Sequence.","authors":"Nanjiba Nawaz, Amit B Desai, Alok A Bhatt","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Enhancement of the facial nerve can be seen on MRI due to its rich arteriovenous plexus. Classically, enhancement of the facial nerve beyond the geniculate ganglion has been described as a normal finding, while enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments is considered abnormal. We hypothesize facial nerve enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments is a normal finding on the postcontrast T1-weighted, fat-saturated volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence on both 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty patients without facial nerve symptoms undergoing MRI by using the internal auditory canal protocol were identified at our institution, 25 cases on a 1.5T scanner and 25 cases on a 3T scanner; a total of 100 facial nerves. Presence or absence of enhancement of the facial nerve segments on the postcontrast T1-weighted, fat-saturated VIBE sequence were independently analyzed by 2 neuroradiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On 1.5T, of 50 facial nerves evaluated, percentage of nerves with enhancement at each segment was as follows: 80% canalicular, 92% labyrinthine, 100% tympanic, 100% mastoid, and 80% intraparotid. On 3T, of 50 facial nerves evaluated, percentage of nerves with enhancement at each segment was as follows: 60% canalicular, 84% labyrinthine, 98% tympanic, 100% mastoid, and 93% intraparotid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments of the facial nerve is a normal finding on the postcontrast, T1-weighted, fat-saturated VIBE sequence. Careful attention to clinical history and asymmetry should be considered before calling abnormality of the facial nerve.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1268-1271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Enhancement of the facial nerve can be seen on MRI due to its rich arteriovenous plexus. Classically, enhancement of the facial nerve beyond the geniculate ganglion has been described as a normal finding, while enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments is considered abnormal. We hypothesize facial nerve enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments is a normal finding on the postcontrast T1-weighted, fat-saturated volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) sequence on both 1.5T and 3T MRI scanners.

Materials and methods: Fifty patients without facial nerve symptoms undergoing MRI by using the internal auditory canal protocol were identified at our institution, 25 cases on a 1.5T scanner and 25 cases on a 3T scanner; a total of 100 facial nerves. Presence or absence of enhancement of the facial nerve segments on the postcontrast T1-weighted, fat-saturated VIBE sequence were independently analyzed by 2 neuroradiologists.

Results: On 1.5T, of 50 facial nerves evaluated, percentage of nerves with enhancement at each segment was as follows: 80% canalicular, 92% labyrinthine, 100% tympanic, 100% mastoid, and 80% intraparotid. On 3T, of 50 facial nerves evaluated, percentage of nerves with enhancement at each segment was as follows: 60% canalicular, 84% labyrinthine, 98% tympanic, 100% mastoid, and 93% intraparotid.

Conclusions: Enhancement of the canalicular and labyrinthine segments of the facial nerve is a normal finding on the postcontrast, T1-weighted, fat-saturated VIBE sequence. Careful attention to clinical history and asymmetry should be considered before calling abnormality of the facial nerve.

容积插值屏气检查核磁共振成像序列上的正常面神经增强。
背景和目的:由于面神经有丰富的动静脉丛,因此在磁共振成像(MRI)上可以看到面神经增强。传统上,膝状神经节以外的面神经增强被描述为正常现象,而管状神经节和迷走神经节段的增强则被认为是异常的。我们假设,在 1.5T 和 3T 扫描仪上进行对比后 T 加权、脂肪饱和 VIBE(容积插值屏气检查)序列时,管状节段和迷宫段的面神经增强是正常的:在我院确定了 50 名无面神经症状的患者,采用内耳道 (IAC) 方案进行磁共振成像,其中 25 例在 1.5T 扫描仪上进行,25 例在 3T 扫描仪上进行;共计 100 条面神经。由两名神经放射学专家独立分析对比后 T1 加权、脂肪饱和 VIBE 序列上面神经节段有无增强:在 1.5T 上评估的 50 条面神经中,各节段出现强化的神经百分比如下80%为管状神经,92%为迷走神经,100%为鼓膜神经,100%为乳突神经,80%为颈内神经。在 3T 上,在评估的 50 条面神经中,各节段增强的神经百分比如下:管状神经 60%,迷宫神经 84%,乳突内神经 80%:管状神经占 60%,迷走神经占 84%,鼓膜神经占 98%,乳突神经占 100%,颈内神经占 93%:结论:在对比后的 T1 加权脂肪饱和 VIBE 序列中,面神经管状段和迷宫段的增强是正常的。在判定面神经异常之前,应仔细考虑临床病史和非对称性:缩写:IAC,内耳道;VIBE,容积插值屏气检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信