Non-intensive care unit feasibility for ambulatory veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Aakash Shah, Stephen Stachnik, Joshua L Leibowitz, Leena Ramadan, Jason Ejimogu, Shreya Singireddy, Warren Naselsky, Alison Grazioli, Joseph Rabin, Zhongjun J Wu, Bartley P Griffith
{"title":"Non-intensive care unit feasibility for ambulatory veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients.","authors":"Aakash Shah, Stephen Stachnik, Joshua L Leibowitz, Leena Ramadan, Jason Ejimogu, Shreya Singireddy, Warren Naselsky, Alison Grazioli, Joseph Rabin, Zhongjun J Wu, Bartley P Griffith","doi":"10.1177/02676591241302959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has increasingly been utilized to support patients in respiratory failure as a bridge to recovery or lung transplantation. As patients progress from cannulation to recovery or transplantation, it has been shown that physical therapy and ambulation are possible and beneficial for patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sought to evaluate the feasibility of managing these ambulatory VV-ECMO patients in a non-ICU setting by conducting a single-center, retrospective cohort study to characterize the daily data collection (i.e., CXRs, blood draws, etc.) and ICU and ECMO interventions and events (i.e., oxygenator/cannula exchange, sweep or flow adjustments, etc.).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 ECMO runs from patients ≥18 years of age who ambulated ≥100 feet while on VV ECMO between 2014 and 2020 were included for analysis. Patients were supported on ECMO a median of 33 [18-79.5] days with a mean of 4.0 (3.8,4.1) data collections per day. There was a mean of 1.1 (1.0,1.2) anticoagulation changes, 1.5 (1.4,1.6) ECMO interventions, and 0.40 (0.34,0.46) ICU interventions per day. There were very few instances of cannula repositioning or oxygenator exchanges - 0.05 (CI 0.04, 0.06) per day.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggests that ambulatory VV-ECMO patients may tolerate less than ICU level of care and may even progress to outpatient management as ECMO technology continues to advance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"2676591241302959"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241302959","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has increasingly been utilized to support patients in respiratory failure as a bridge to recovery or lung transplantation. As patients progress from cannulation to recovery or transplantation, it has been shown that physical therapy and ambulation are possible and beneficial for patient outcomes.

Methods: We sought to evaluate the feasibility of managing these ambulatory VV-ECMO patients in a non-ICU setting by conducting a single-center, retrospective cohort study to characterize the daily data collection (i.e., CXRs, blood draws, etc.) and ICU and ECMO interventions and events (i.e., oxygenator/cannula exchange, sweep or flow adjustments, etc.).

Results: A total of 28 ECMO runs from patients ≥18 years of age who ambulated ≥100 feet while on VV ECMO between 2014 and 2020 were included for analysis. Patients were supported on ECMO a median of 33 [18-79.5] days with a mean of 4.0 (3.8,4.1) data collections per day. There was a mean of 1.1 (1.0,1.2) anticoagulation changes, 1.5 (1.4,1.6) ECMO interventions, and 0.40 (0.34,0.46) ICU interventions per day. There were very few instances of cannula repositioning or oxygenator exchanges - 0.05 (CI 0.04, 0.06) per day.

Conclusion: Our data suggests that ambulatory VV-ECMO patients may tolerate less than ICU level of care and may even progress to outpatient management as ECMO technology continues to advance.

流动性静脉体外膜肺氧合患者的非重症监护病房可行性。
简介:静脉体外膜氧合越来越多地用于支持呼吸衰竭患者,作为康复或肺移植的桥梁。随着患者从插管到康复或移植的进展,理疗和步行已被证明是可行的,并有利于患者的治疗效果:我们试图评估在非重症监护室环境下管理这些非卧床 VV-ECMO 患者的可行性,为此我们进行了一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,以描述日常数据收集(即 CXR、抽血等)以及重症监护室和 ECMO 干预和事件(即氧合器/套管交换、扫扫或流量调整等)的特点:共纳入了 2014 年至 2020 年期间年龄≥18 岁、使用 VV ECMO 时行走距离≥100 英尺的患者的 28 次 ECMO 运行进行分析。患者接受 ECMO 支持的时间中位数为 33 [18-79.5] 天,平均每天采集 4.0 (3.8,4.1) 次数据。平均每天有 1.1(1.0,1.2)次抗凝变化、1.5(1.4,1.6)次 ECMO 干预和 0.40(0.34,0.46)次 ICU 干预。插管重新定位或氧合器交换的情况很少 - 每天 0.05(CI 0.04,0.06)次:我们的数据表明,随着 ECMO 技术的不断进步,非卧床 VV-ECMO 患者所能承受的护理水平可能低于重症监护室水平,甚至可能发展到门诊管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信