Comparison of rectus femoris muscle shear wave elastography and thickness on evaluation of frailty.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ayse Fadiloglu, Esra Cataltepe, Eda Ceker, Seriyye Allahverdiyeva, Seymur Samadli, Halit Nahit Sendur, Fatih Güngör, Hacer Dogan Varan
{"title":"Comparison of rectus femoris muscle shear wave elastography and thickness on evaluation of frailty.","authors":"Ayse Fadiloglu, Esra Cataltepe, Eda Ceker, Seriyye Allahverdiyeva, Seymur Samadli, Halit Nahit Sendur, Fatih Güngör, Hacer Dogan Varan","doi":"10.1007/s41999-024-01103-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential of rectus femoris shear wave elastography (RF-SWE) in assessing its impact on frailty and physical performance parameters, using a comparative analysis with rectus femoris muscle thickness (RF-MT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 149 participants aged 60 and above were included in this research. All participants underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment, frailty status assessment (using the frailty phenotype [FFP]), and evaluation of physical performance parameters (utilizing the short physical performance battery score [SPPB] and handgrip strength measurement). RF-MT and RF-SWE were measured by a radiologist with participants in a prone and relaxed position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 73.8 ± 6.5, with 61.7% (n = 92) being female. Participants were divided into 2 groups based on their frailty status, with 40 (26.8%) identified as frail and 109 (73.2%) as non-frail. RF-MT exhibited a significant correlation with frailty and the SPPB, while RF-SWE did not exhibit significant associations except for handgrip strength. In regression analyses, RF-MT was found to be significantly and independently associated with physical frailty. The optimal cutoff value for RF-MT was determined to be ≤ 17.74 (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.752; 95% CI 0.675-0.819; p < 0.001). In contrast, RF-SWE did not show a significant relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RF-MT is more strongly associated with physical performance and physical frailty than the muscle quality assessed by RF-SWE. Measuring RF-MT, rather than RF-SWE, proves to be an effective tool for predicting frailty in the geriatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-024-01103-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential of rectus femoris shear wave elastography (RF-SWE) in assessing its impact on frailty and physical performance parameters, using a comparative analysis with rectus femoris muscle thickness (RF-MT).

Methods: A total of 149 participants aged 60 and above were included in this research. All participants underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment, frailty status assessment (using the frailty phenotype [FFP]), and evaluation of physical performance parameters (utilizing the short physical performance battery score [SPPB] and handgrip strength measurement). RF-MT and RF-SWE were measured by a radiologist with participants in a prone and relaxed position.

Results: The mean age of participants was 73.8 ± 6.5, with 61.7% (n = 92) being female. Participants were divided into 2 groups based on their frailty status, with 40 (26.8%) identified as frail and 109 (73.2%) as non-frail. RF-MT exhibited a significant correlation with frailty and the SPPB, while RF-SWE did not exhibit significant associations except for handgrip strength. In regression analyses, RF-MT was found to be significantly and independently associated with physical frailty. The optimal cutoff value for RF-MT was determined to be ≤ 17.74 (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.752; 95% CI 0.675-0.819; p < 0.001). In contrast, RF-SWE did not show a significant relationship.

Conclusion: RF-MT is more strongly associated with physical performance and physical frailty than the muscle quality assessed by RF-SWE. Measuring RF-MT, rather than RF-SWE, proves to be an effective tool for predicting frailty in the geriatric population.

股直肌剪切波弹性成像与厚度在评估虚弱程度方面的比较。
目的:本研究旨在通过与股直肌厚度(RF-MT)的对比分析,评估股直肌剪切波弹性成像(RF-SWE)在评估其对虚弱和体能参数的影响方面的潜力:本研究共纳入了 149 名 60 岁及以上的参与者。所有参与者都接受了全面的老年病学评估、虚弱状态评估(使用虚弱表型[FFP])和体能参数评估(使用短期体能电池评分[SPPB]和手握力测量)。RF-MT和RF-SWE由放射科医生在参与者俯卧和放松姿势下进行测量:参与者的平均年龄为(73.8 ± 6.5)岁,其中 61.7% (n = 92)为女性。根据体弱状况将参与者分为两组,其中 40 人(26.8%)为体弱者,109 人(73.2%)为非体弱者。RF-MT与体弱程度和SPPB有显著相关性,而RF-SWE除手握力量外没有显著相关性。回归分析发现,RF-MT 与体质虚弱有明显的独立相关性。RF-MT的最佳临界值被确定为≤17.74(ROC曲线下面积[AUC],0.752;95% CI 0.675-0.819;P 结论:RF-MT与体质虚弱的关系更为密切:与 RF-SWE 评估的肌肉质量相比,RF-MT 与身体表现和身体虚弱的关系更为密切。事实证明,测量 RF-MT 而不是 RF-SWE 是预测老年体弱的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信