Medicare policy changes to primary health care funding for Australia's indigenous Peoples 1996-2023: a scoping review.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Helen Kehoe, Heike Schütze, Geoffrey Spurling, Raymond Lovett
{"title":"Medicare policy changes to primary health care funding for Australia's indigenous Peoples 1996-2023: a scoping review.","authors":"Helen Kehoe, Heike Schütze, Geoffrey Spurling, Raymond Lovett","doi":"10.1186/s12939-024-02325-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Australian Government began implementing Medicare policies in the late 1990s aiming to improve Indigenous Peoples' access to the primary care. No aggregate central list of what policies have been implemented exists. The aim of this review was twofold: first to perform a scoping review to identify any literature mentioning a policy implemented between 1996 and 2023 regarding Indigenous Peoples' access to Medicare or the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for primary care, and secondly to synthesise and describe any policies to enable learning from past successes and failures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR process. Seven electronic databases were searched for any papers identifying any policy implemented between 1996-2023 to improve Indigenous Peoples' access to primary care. This was supplemented with searches in Google, key government databases, hand searching and expert input.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen policies were implemented and organised into six categories according to the primary care barrier they targeted: Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) funding structure; lack of Indignenous-appropriate MBS items; Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) access barriers; inappropriate care from mainstream general practitioners; bureaucratic impediments to MBS and PBS access; and data gaps.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>This is the first synthesis of Medicare and PBS policy history to improve Indigenous Peoples' access to primary health care, and provides a platform for future analysis. Identifying the names of relevant policies in any area is key to accountability and reliance on individual expertise is no substitute for transparent and durable policy record-keeping. A searchable long-term policy repository should be established to ensure that related policies can be identified, and that key policy documentation is publicly available in perpetuity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"245"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02325-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Australian Government began implementing Medicare policies in the late 1990s aiming to improve Indigenous Peoples' access to the primary care. No aggregate central list of what policies have been implemented exists. The aim of this review was twofold: first to perform a scoping review to identify any literature mentioning a policy implemented between 1996 and 2023 regarding Indigenous Peoples' access to Medicare or the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for primary care, and secondly to synthesise and describe any policies to enable learning from past successes and failures.

Methods: Scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR process. Seven electronic databases were searched for any papers identifying any policy implemented between 1996-2023 to improve Indigenous Peoples' access to primary care. This was supplemented with searches in Google, key government databases, hand searching and expert input.

Results: Sixteen policies were implemented and organised into six categories according to the primary care barrier they targeted: Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) funding structure; lack of Indignenous-appropriate MBS items; Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) access barriers; inappropriate care from mainstream general practitioners; bureaucratic impediments to MBS and PBS access; and data gaps.

Discussion/conclusion: This is the first synthesis of Medicare and PBS policy history to improve Indigenous Peoples' access to primary health care, and provides a platform for future analysis. Identifying the names of relevant policies in any area is key to accountability and reliance on individual expertise is no substitute for transparent and durable policy record-keeping. A searchable long-term policy repository should be established to ensure that related policies can be identified, and that key policy documentation is publicly available in perpetuity.

1996-2023 年澳大利亚土著居民初级卫生保健资金的医疗保险政策变化:范围审查。
背景:澳大利亚政府于 20 世纪 90 年代末开始实施医疗保险政策,旨在改善土著居民获得初级保健的机会。目前还没有关于已实施政策的综合中央清单。本综述的目的有二:首先,进行范围界定综述,以确定是否有文献提及 1996 年至 2023 年间实施的有关原住民享受医疗保险或初级医疗药品福利计划的政策;其次,对任何政策进行综合和描述,以便从过去的成功和失败中吸取经验教训:方法:按照 PRISMA-ScR 流程进行范围界定审查。方法:按照 PRISMA-ScR 流程进行范围界定审查。在七个电子数据库中搜索了 1996-2023 年间为改善原住民获得初级医疗服务而实施的任何政策的相关论文。此外,还辅以谷歌搜索、主要政府数据库、人工搜索和专家意见:结果:共实施了 16 项政策,并根据其针对的初级保健障碍分为六类:医疗保险福利表(MBS)的资金结构;缺乏与 "愤慨 "相适应的医疗保险福利表项目;药品福利计划(PBS)的使用障碍;主流全科医生的不当护理;医疗保险福利表和药品福利计划使用的官僚障碍;以及数据缺口:这是对医疗保险和公共预算系统政策历史的首次综述,旨在改善原住民获得初级医疗保健的机会,并为今后的分析提供了一个平台。确定任何领域相关政策的名称都是问责的关键,依靠个人的专业知识无法取代透明、持久的政策记录。应建立一个可搜索的长期政策库,以确保相关政策能够被识别,关键政策文件能够永久公开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信