Impact of short-term patient education intervention on the teaching skills of physical therapy students: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Vedrana Grbavac, Mladenka Naletilić, Josip Šimić
{"title":"Impact of short-term patient education intervention on the teaching skills of physical therapy students: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Vedrana Grbavac, Mladenka Naletilić, Josip Šimić","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06360-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient education is an important aspect of physiotherapy. Effective education is based on quality communication and understanding of patients' needs. For a successful practice, it is necessary to recognize the factors that affect the ability to teach the patient and prepare new physiotherapists for this task. The research aims to determine the effect of training on the self-efficacy and skills of physiotherapy students in patient education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Final-year physiotherapy students were randomized into an intervention group (52 students) and a control group (51 students). The intervention group participated in 2.5 hours of lectures, discussions, simulated exercises with colleagues, and video examples of patient education. Students in the control group received standardized instruction without the additional intervention provided to the experimental group. All students performed a self-assessment of their teaching abilities. Patient education was assessed by a blinded evaluator using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination from an audio-recorded simulated clinical practice task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show no differences in demographic variables, while a significant improvement was achieved for the intervention group after the training. The intervention group before the experiment did not perform differently than the control group on self-efficacy items (p>.05), but they did perform significantly better than the control group after the experiment (p<.001). The intervention group showed better results than the control group in almost all observed fields.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short-term educational intervention significantly enhances physiotherapy students' self-efficacy and patient education skills, emphasizing the value of structured educational interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"1348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06360-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient education is an important aspect of physiotherapy. Effective education is based on quality communication and understanding of patients' needs. For a successful practice, it is necessary to recognize the factors that affect the ability to teach the patient and prepare new physiotherapists for this task. The research aims to determine the effect of training on the self-efficacy and skills of physiotherapy students in patient education.

Methods: Final-year physiotherapy students were randomized into an intervention group (52 students) and a control group (51 students). The intervention group participated in 2.5 hours of lectures, discussions, simulated exercises with colleagues, and video examples of patient education. Students in the control group received standardized instruction without the additional intervention provided to the experimental group. All students performed a self-assessment of their teaching abilities. Patient education was assessed by a blinded evaluator using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination from an audio-recorded simulated clinical practice task.

Results: The results show no differences in demographic variables, while a significant improvement was achieved for the intervention group after the training. The intervention group before the experiment did not perform differently than the control group on self-efficacy items (p>.05), but they did perform significantly better than the control group after the experiment (p<.001). The intervention group showed better results than the control group in almost all observed fields.

Conclusion: Short-term educational intervention significantly enhances physiotherapy students' self-efficacy and patient education skills, emphasizing the value of structured educational interventions.

短期患者教育干预对物理治疗专业学生教学技能的影响:随机对照试验。
背景:患者教育是物理治疗的一个重要方面。有效教育的基础是高质量的沟通和对患者需求的理解。要想在实践中取得成功,就必须认识到影响患者教育能力的因素,并让新的物理治疗师为这项任务做好准备。本研究旨在确定培训对物理治疗专业学生在患者教育方面的自我效能感和技能的影响:方法:将物理治疗专业毕业班学生随机分为干预组(52 名)和对照组(51 名)。干预组参加了 2.5 小时的讲座、讨论、与同事的模拟练习以及病人教育视频示例。对照组学生接受的是标准化教学,没有实验组的额外干预。所有学生都对自己的教学能力进行了自我评估。患者教育由一名盲人评估员通过录音模拟临床实践任务中的客观结构化临床检查进行评估:结果显示,人口统计学变量没有差异,而干预组在培训后取得了显著进步。实验前干预组在自我效能项目上的表现与对照组没有差异(P>.05),但实验后干预组的表现明显优于对照组(P结论:短期教育干预能显著提高物理治疗师的自我效能:短期教育干预明显提高了物理治疗专业学生的自我效能感和患者教育技能,强调了结构化教育干预的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信