Prognostic effects of glycaemic variability on diastolic heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights and 1-year mortality machine learning prediction model.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Zhenkun Yang, Yuanjie Li, Yang Liu, Ziyi Zhong, Coleen Ditchfield, Taipu Guo, Mingjuan Yang, Yang Chen
{"title":"Prognostic effects of glycaemic variability on diastolic heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights and 1-year mortality machine learning prediction model.","authors":"Zhenkun Yang, Yuanjie Li, Yang Liu, Ziyi Zhong, Coleen Ditchfield, Taipu Guo, Mingjuan Yang, Yang Chen","doi":"10.1186/s13098-024-01534-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diastolic heart failure (DHF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often coexist, causing increased mortality rates. Glycaemic variability (GV) exacerbates cardiovascular complications, but its impact on outcomes in patients with DHF and T2DM remains unclear. This study examined the relationships between GV with mortality outcomes, and developed a machine learning (ML) model for long-term mortality in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with DHF and T2DM were included from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV, with admissions (2008-2019) as primary analysis cohort and admissions (2020-2022) as external validation cohort. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to evaluate the associations of GV with 90-day, 1-year, and 3-year all-cause mortality. The primary analysis cohort was split into training and internal validation cohorts, then developing ML models for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality in training cohort, which were validated using the internal and external validation cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,128 patients with DHF and T2DM were included in primary analysis cohort (meidian age 71.0years [IQR: 62.0-79.0]; 46.9% male), 498 patients with DHF and T2DM were included in the external validation cohort (meidian age 75.0years [IQR: 67.0-81.0]; 54.0% male). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models showed that high GV tertiles were associated with higher risk of 90-day (T2: HR 1.45, 95%CI 1.09-1.93; T3: HR 1.96, 95%CI 1.48-2.60), 1-year (T2: HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.02-1.53; T3: HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.26-1.89), and 3-year (T2: HR 1.31, 95%CI: 1.10-1.56; T3: HR 1.48, 95%CI 1.23-1.77) all-cause mortality, compared with lowest GV tertile. Chronic kidney disease, creatinine, potassium, haemoglobin, and white blood cell were identified as mediators of GV and 1-year all-cause mortality. Additionally, GV and other clinical features were pre-selected to construct ML models. The random forest model performed best, with AUC (0.770) and G-mean (0.591) in internal validation, with AUC (0.753) and G-mean (0.599) in external validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GV was determined as an independent risk factor for short-term and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with DHF and T2DM, with a potential intervention threshold around 25.0%. The ML model incorporating GV demonstrated strong predictive performance for 1-year all-cause mortality, highlighting its importance in early risk stratification management of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"16 1","pages":"280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01534-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diastolic heart failure (DHF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often coexist, causing increased mortality rates. Glycaemic variability (GV) exacerbates cardiovascular complications, but its impact on outcomes in patients with DHF and T2DM remains unclear. This study examined the relationships between GV with mortality outcomes, and developed a machine learning (ML) model for long-term mortality in these patients.

Methods: Patients with DHF and T2DM were included from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV, with admissions (2008-2019) as primary analysis cohort and admissions (2020-2022) as external validation cohort. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to evaluate the associations of GV with 90-day, 1-year, and 3-year all-cause mortality. The primary analysis cohort was split into training and internal validation cohorts, then developing ML models for predicting 1-year all-cause mortality in training cohort, which were validated using the internal and external validation cohorts.

Results: 2,128 patients with DHF and T2DM were included in primary analysis cohort (meidian age 71.0years [IQR: 62.0-79.0]; 46.9% male), 498 patients with DHF and T2DM were included in the external validation cohort (meidian age 75.0years [IQR: 67.0-81.0]; 54.0% male). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models showed that high GV tertiles were associated with higher risk of 90-day (T2: HR 1.45, 95%CI 1.09-1.93; T3: HR 1.96, 95%CI 1.48-2.60), 1-year (T2: HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.02-1.53; T3: HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.26-1.89), and 3-year (T2: HR 1.31, 95%CI: 1.10-1.56; T3: HR 1.48, 95%CI 1.23-1.77) all-cause mortality, compared with lowest GV tertile. Chronic kidney disease, creatinine, potassium, haemoglobin, and white blood cell were identified as mediators of GV and 1-year all-cause mortality. Additionally, GV and other clinical features were pre-selected to construct ML models. The random forest model performed best, with AUC (0.770) and G-mean (0.591) in internal validation, with AUC (0.753) and G-mean (0.599) in external validation.

Conclusion: GV was determined as an independent risk factor for short-term and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with DHF and T2DM, with a potential intervention threshold around 25.0%. The ML model incorporating GV demonstrated strong predictive performance for 1-year all-cause mortality, highlighting its importance in early risk stratification management of these patients.

血糖变异性对舒张性心力衰竭和 2 型糖尿病的预后影响:见解和 1 年死亡率机器学习预测模型。
背景:舒张性心力衰竭(DHF)和 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)经常并存,导致死亡率上升。血糖变异性(GV)会加重心血管并发症,但其对舒张性心力衰竭和 2 型糖尿病患者的预后影响仍不清楚。本研究探讨了血糖变异与死亡率之间的关系,并针对这些患者的长期死亡率建立了一个机器学习(ML)模型:方法:DHF和T2DM患者均来自重症监护医学信息中心(Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV),入院时间(2008-2019年)为主要分析队列,入院时间(2020-2022年)为外部验证队列。采用多变量 Cox 比例危险模型和限制性立方样条分析来评估 GV 与 90 天、1 年和 3 年全因死亡率的关系。将主要分析队列分为训练队列和内部验证队列,然后在训练队列中建立预测 1 年全因死亡率的 ML 模型,并通过内部和外部验证队列进行验证。结果:2128 名 DHF 和 T2DM 患者被纳入主要分析队列(平均年龄 71.0 岁 [IQR:62.0-79.0];46.9% 为男性),498 名 DHF 和 T2DM 患者被纳入外部验证队列(平均年龄 75.0 岁 [IQR:67.0-81.0];54.0% 为男性)。多变量 Cox 比例危险模型显示,高 GV 三元组与较高的 90 天(T2:HR 1.45,95%CI 1.09-1.93;T3:HR 1.96,95%CI 1.48-2.60)、1 年(T2:HR 1.25,95%CI 1.02-1.53;T3:HR 1.54,95%CI 1.26-1.89)和 3 年(T2:HR 1.31,95%CI:1.10-1.56;T3:HR 1.48,95%CI 1.23-1.77)全因死亡率。慢性肾病、肌酐、血钾、血红蛋白和白细胞被确定为 GV 和 1 年全因死亡率的中介因素。此外,还预先选择了 GV 和其他临床特征来构建 ML 模型。随机森林模型表现最佳,内部验证的AUC(0.770)和G-mean(0.591),外部验证的AUC(0.753)和G-mean(0.599):结论:GV 被确定为 DHF 和 T2DM 患者短期和长期全因死亡率的独立风险因素,潜在干预阈值约为 25.0%。包含 GV 的 ML 模型对 1 年全因死亡率有很强的预测能力,突出了其在这些患者的早期风险分层管理中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信