Eric G. Lambert, Hanif Qureshi, Nancy L. Hogan, David White, James Frank
{"title":"Organizational Structure and Its Connection with the Justice Views of Police Officers","authors":"Eric G. Lambert, Hanif Qureshi, Nancy L. Hogan, David White, James Frank","doi":"10.1007/s11417-024-09445-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research on how different workplace variables relate to perceptions of organizational justice for police officers is almost absent from the literature. To fill this void, the current study examined the impact of input into decision-making, formalization, instrumental communication, and organizational support on the distributive and procedural justice views of police officers from the Haryana State of India. Based on the social exchange theory’s principle of reciprocity, these variables should result in favorable views of the organization, and, in turn, should raise views of the police organization’s justice efforts. Measures of distributive justice, procedural justice for promotions, and procedural justice for evaluations were created. Input, formalization, support, and communication had significant associations with higher distributive justice and procedural justice for evaluation views. Formalization, communication, and support had significant associations with higher views of procedural justice for promotions, but input had a nonsignificant relationship. The findings from this study offer police administrators a low cost and practical solution for enhancing organizational justice views of officers by increasing the level of input, formalization, support, and communication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45526,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Criminology","volume":"19 4","pages":"593 - 616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11417-024-09445-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research on how different workplace variables relate to perceptions of organizational justice for police officers is almost absent from the literature. To fill this void, the current study examined the impact of input into decision-making, formalization, instrumental communication, and organizational support on the distributive and procedural justice views of police officers from the Haryana State of India. Based on the social exchange theory’s principle of reciprocity, these variables should result in favorable views of the organization, and, in turn, should raise views of the police organization’s justice efforts. Measures of distributive justice, procedural justice for promotions, and procedural justice for evaluations were created. Input, formalization, support, and communication had significant associations with higher distributive justice and procedural justice for evaluation views. Formalization, communication, and support had significant associations with higher views of procedural justice for promotions, but input had a nonsignificant relationship. The findings from this study offer police administrators a low cost and practical solution for enhancing organizational justice views of officers by increasing the level of input, formalization, support, and communication.
期刊介绍:
Electronic submission now possible! Please see the Instructions for Authors. For general information about this new journal please contact the publisher at [welmoed.spahr@springer.com] The Asian Journal of Criminology aims to advance the study of criminology and criminal justice in Asia, to promote evidence-based public policy in crime prevention, and to promote comparative studies about crime and criminal justice. The Journal provides a platform for criminologists, policymakers, and practitioners and welcomes manuscripts relating to crime, crime prevention, criminal law, medico-legal topics and the administration of criminal justice in Asian countries. The Journal especially encourages theoretical and methodological papers with an emphasis on evidence-based, empirical research addressing crime in Asian contexts. It seeks to publish research arising from a broad variety of methodological traditions, including quantitative, qualitative, historical, and comparative methods. The Journal fosters a multi-disciplinary focus and welcomes manuscripts from a variety of disciplines, including criminology, criminal justice, law, sociology, psychology, forensic science, social work, urban studies, history, and geography.